Real Costs Assessment of Solar-Hydrogen and Some Fossil Fuels by means of a Combustion Analysis

IF 1.5 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Journal of Combustion Pub Date : 2016-02-03 DOI:10.1155/2016/6527510
G. Nicoletti, R. Bruno, N. Arcuri, Gerardo Nicoletti
{"title":"Real Costs Assessment of Solar-Hydrogen and Some Fossil Fuels by means of a Combustion Analysis","authors":"G. Nicoletti, R. Bruno, N. Arcuri, Gerardo Nicoletti","doi":"10.1155/2016/6527510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to compare solar-hydrogen and the most used fossil fuels, the evaluation of the “external” costs related to their use is required. These costs involve the environmental damage produced by the combustion reactions, the health problems caused by air pollution, the damage to land from fuel mining, and the environmental degradation linked to the global warming, the acid rains, and the water pollution. For each fuel, the global cost is determined as sum of the market price and of the correspondent external costs. In order to obtain a quantitative comparison, the quality of the different combustion reactions and the efficiency of the technologies employed in the specific application sector have to be considered adequately. At this purpose, an entropic index that considers the degree of irreversibility produced during the combustion process and the degradation of surroundings is introduced. Additionally, an environmental index that measures the pollutants released during the combustions is proposed. The combination of these indexes and the efficiency of the several technologies employed in four energy sectors have allowed the evaluation of the total costs, highlighting an economic scenario from which the real advantages concerning the exploitation of different energy carrier are determined.","PeriodicalId":44364,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Combustion","volume":"5 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Combustion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6527510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In order to compare solar-hydrogen and the most used fossil fuels, the evaluation of the “external” costs related to their use is required. These costs involve the environmental damage produced by the combustion reactions, the health problems caused by air pollution, the damage to land from fuel mining, and the environmental degradation linked to the global warming, the acid rains, and the water pollution. For each fuel, the global cost is determined as sum of the market price and of the correspondent external costs. In order to obtain a quantitative comparison, the quality of the different combustion reactions and the efficiency of the technologies employed in the specific application sector have to be considered adequately. At this purpose, an entropic index that considers the degree of irreversibility produced during the combustion process and the degradation of surroundings is introduced. Additionally, an environmental index that measures the pollutants released during the combustions is proposed. The combination of these indexes and the efficiency of the several technologies employed in four energy sectors have allowed the evaluation of the total costs, highlighting an economic scenario from which the real advantages concerning the exploitation of different energy carrier are determined.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于燃烧分析的太阳能-氢和一些化石燃料的实际成本评估
为了比较太阳能氢燃料和最常用的化石燃料,需要评估与它们的使用有关的“外部”成本。这些成本包括燃烧反应造成的环境破坏、空气污染造成的健康问题、燃料开采对土地的破坏以及与全球变暖、酸雨和水污染有关的环境退化。对于每种燃料,全球成本由市场价格和相应的外部成本之和确定。为了获得定量比较,必须充分考虑不同燃烧反应的质量和特定应用领域所采用的技术的效率。为此,引入了考虑燃烧过程和环境退化过程中产生的不可逆性程度的熵指数。此外,还提出了一种测量燃烧过程中释放的污染物的环境指标。将这些指数和四个能源部门所采用的几种技术的效率结合起来,可以对总成本进行评价,突出了一种经济情景,从中可以确定利用不同能源载体的真正优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Combustion
Journal of Combustion ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
28.60%
发文量
8
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative Analysis of Swirl Burner and Cross Jet Burner in Terms of Efficiency and Environmental Performance Uranium Dust Cloud Combustion: Burning Characteristics and Absorption Spectroscopy Measurements An Overview of Energy Recovery from Local Slaughterhouse-Based Gallus gallus domesticus Greasy Residues and Latest Applications Effectiveness of Charcoal Adsorbent in Flue Gas Filters for PCB Reduction in Smoke from Hospital Incinerators Effects of Gasoline and Hydrogen Blends on Exhaust Gas Emissions and Fuel Consumption from Gasoline Internal Combustion Engines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1