Hearing Red: Aurality and performance in a film by Simon Gush

Q4 Arts and Humanities Kronos Pub Date : 2016-11-01 DOI:10.17159/2309-9585/2016/V42A9
Brett Pyper
{"title":"Hearing Red: Aurality and performance in a film by Simon Gush","authors":"Brett Pyper","doi":"10.17159/2309-9585/2016/V42A9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Focusing on the film that accompanies Simon Gush’s installation Red, this article positions itself within the ‘ambient humanities’ and explores sound as its primary mode of inquiry. I consider how sound constitutes not just the soundtrack but also, at particular moments, becomes the subject of the film itself. I believe these moments are worth attending to because, empirically speaking, they render audible some aspects of history that might otherwise literally be overlooked. Taking my cue from a striking aural performance recounted in the film, I consider possible archaeologies of insurrectionary noise in South Africa and beyond. Beyond the empirical, I am interested in theorising not only about but also with sound, and reflecting on how doing so with respect to history might be productive. I thus tease out thinking about sound in history, sound with history, sounding history and the like, in the process asking what aesthetics can do for the work of history. Drawing on ideas advanced recently by John Mowitt (2015), I consider how the notions of echo and resonance illustrate the kinds of alternative epistemological perspectives that attention to sound might enable for historiography. In the conclusion, I tie these back to the foregrounding of performance – particularly performance with a strong aural dimension – in the constitution of social and public memory.","PeriodicalId":53088,"journal":{"name":"Kronos","volume":"28 1","pages":"143-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kronos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-9585/2016/V42A9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Focusing on the film that accompanies Simon Gush’s installation Red, this article positions itself within the ‘ambient humanities’ and explores sound as its primary mode of inquiry. I consider how sound constitutes not just the soundtrack but also, at particular moments, becomes the subject of the film itself. I believe these moments are worth attending to because, empirically speaking, they render audible some aspects of history that might otherwise literally be overlooked. Taking my cue from a striking aural performance recounted in the film, I consider possible archaeologies of insurrectionary noise in South Africa and beyond. Beyond the empirical, I am interested in theorising not only about but also with sound, and reflecting on how doing so with respect to history might be productive. I thus tease out thinking about sound in history, sound with history, sounding history and the like, in the process asking what aesthetics can do for the work of history. Drawing on ideas advanced recently by John Mowitt (2015), I consider how the notions of echo and resonance illustrate the kinds of alternative epistemological perspectives that attention to sound might enable for historiography. In the conclusion, I tie these back to the foregrounding of performance – particularly performance with a strong aural dimension – in the constitution of social and public memory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《听觉红色:西蒙·古什电影中的听觉和表演》
本文以西蒙·古什的装置作品《红色》为中心,将自己定位在“环境人文”中,并将声音作为其主要的探索模式。我认为声音不仅构成了原声,而且在特定时刻也成为了电影本身的主题。我相信这些时刻是值得关注的,因为从经验上讲,它们让人们听到了历史的某些方面,否则这些方面可能会被忽视。我从影片中讲述的一段引人注目的听觉表演中得到启发,考虑了南非及其他地区可能存在的叛乱噪音考古学。除了经验之外,我不仅对声音的理论化很感兴趣,而且对声音的理论化也很感兴趣,并思考在历史方面这样做是如何产生成效的。因此,我梳理出了关于历史中的声音、历史中的声音、听起来的历史等等的思考,在这个过程中,我问美学可以为历史工作做些什么。借鉴John Mowitt(2015)最近提出的观点,我考虑了回声和共振的概念如何说明了对声音的关注可能为史学提供的各种替代认识论观点。在结论中,我将这些与表演的前景联系起来——特别是具有强烈听觉维度的表演——在社会和公共记忆的构成中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kronos
Kronos Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Our Stories: Cartography of a Conflict Domination, Collaboration and Conflict in Cabo Delgado's History of Extractivism Public Culture, Sociality, and Listening to Jazz: Aural Memorialisation in the Time of COVID A Mercy Oral/Aural: Pastness and Sound as Medium and Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1