Evaluation the Efficiency of Stabilization Technique of Organic Soil by Comparison Between the Two Stabilizers

S. Mohammed, K. A. saeed, N. Kariem
{"title":"Evaluation the Efficiency of Stabilization Technique of Organic Soil by Comparison Between the Two Stabilizers","authors":"S. Mohammed, K. A. saeed, N. Kariem","doi":"10.38124/IJISRT20SEP275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sewage treatment plants produce large quantities of sewage sludge as by-products, as the sludge contains elements harmful to environment. Such study investigated of utilizing different percentages of sewage (7, 14 and 21%) of soil weight. The stabilization / solidification process was used to improve the properties of the organic soil and meet its requirements. This technique was the use of traditional and nontraditional additives such as cement and styrene acrylic. The major objective of that research is to evaluate efficiency of stabilized soils through comparison of stabilizers. The organic soil was prepared and stabilizers were added in different proportions (3, 6 and 9%) for the purpose of the tests. Mechanical tests (Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) and Hardness) were used for the soil sample to estimate the best mixing and obtaining higher strength. Through outcome of the UCS and hardness tests, cement was most effective agent of styrene in terms of improving the properties, strength and hardness of the organic treated soil.","PeriodicalId":23709,"journal":{"name":"Volume 5 - 2020, Issue 9 - September","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 5 - 2020, Issue 9 - September","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38124/IJISRT20SEP275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sewage treatment plants produce large quantities of sewage sludge as by-products, as the sludge contains elements harmful to environment. Such study investigated of utilizing different percentages of sewage (7, 14 and 21%) of soil weight. The stabilization / solidification process was used to improve the properties of the organic soil and meet its requirements. This technique was the use of traditional and nontraditional additives such as cement and styrene acrylic. The major objective of that research is to evaluate efficiency of stabilized soils through comparison of stabilizers. The organic soil was prepared and stabilizers were added in different proportions (3, 6 and 9%) for the purpose of the tests. Mechanical tests (Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) and Hardness) were used for the soil sample to estimate the best mixing and obtaining higher strength. Through outcome of the UCS and hardness tests, cement was most effective agent of styrene in terms of improving the properties, strength and hardness of the organic treated soil.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过两种稳定剂的比较评价有机土壤稳定技术的效果
污水处理厂会产生大量的污水污泥,因为污泥中含有对环境有害的元素。本研究考察了污水在土壤重量中所占的比例(7、14、21%)。采用稳定化/固化工艺改善了有机土壤的性质,满足了有机土壤的要求。该技术使用了传统和非传统的添加剂,如水泥和苯乙烯丙烯酸。该研究的主要目的是通过比较稳定剂来评价稳定土的效率。制备了有机土壤,并按不同比例(3、6、9%)添加了稳定剂。通过力学试验(无侧限抗压强度和硬度)对土样进行了预估,获得了较高的强度。通过单强度试验和硬度试验结果表明,在改善有机处理土壤的性能、强度和硬度方面,水泥是苯乙烯最有效的助剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Le biodéchet, une notion à stabiliser pour une meilleure valorisation Recyclabilité d’un emballage : Évaluation de la triabilité avec la technologie RFID Évaluation de la circularité des déblais comme critère d’achat éco-responsable dans les marchés de travaux Some features of short-term blood pressure variability in patients with arterial hypertension in comparison with healthy volunteers Translational medicine: ways of development in modern conditions, problems and prospects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1