Economic and Functional Feasibility of Concrete and Steel Composite Column Building Structure

U. Ahmed, Assad Rashid, Z. Baig
{"title":"Economic and Functional Feasibility of Concrete and Steel Composite Column Building Structure","authors":"U. Ahmed, Assad Rashid, Z. Baig","doi":"10.11648/J.AJCE.20210905.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern day construction is widely influenced using Steel-Concrete composite columns. The rapid growth in Steel-Concrete composite construction has significantly reduced the use of conventional Reinforced Cement Concrete (R.C.C) as well as other steel construction practices. Steel-Concrete composite construction gained an extensive receiving around the globe. Considering the fact that R.C.C construction is most suitable and economic for low-rise construction so it is used in framing system in most structures. However; increased dead load, span restriction, less stiffness and risky formwork makes R.C.C construction uneconomical and not suitable when it comes to intermediate to high-rise buildings. One Basement and 11 storeys existing building has been analyzed and comparison has been made between R.CC structure and concrete steel composite columns. Equivalent Static non -linear analysis was performed in X and Y direction by using Etabs 2017 software which results that encased composite columns construction cost is more than R.C.C columns but on the other hand encased composite columns has more floor area, the storey shear is more, story drift is less, storey displacement is less, in conventional R.C.C structures, storey shear is less in R.C.C conventional structure. Therefore; this research aims to analyze and to learn This research is an effort to learn cost effectiveness, increased or decreased stiffness and change on functionality of composite construction for intermediate to high-rise buildings in Pakistan. A Base + Ground +11 storey commercial building was selected for this study. Comparison is done between conventional R.C.C structure and Encased Composite column structure. Equivalent Static non-linear analysis was performed using ETABS 2017 software. Although for Base + Ground + 11 storey building the construction cost is 7.7% more than R.C.C structure but encased composite column building has 13.013% more floor area. This increased floor area will help to settle the cost difference between two structures.","PeriodicalId":7606,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.AJCE.20210905.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Modern day construction is widely influenced using Steel-Concrete composite columns. The rapid growth in Steel-Concrete composite construction has significantly reduced the use of conventional Reinforced Cement Concrete (R.C.C) as well as other steel construction practices. Steel-Concrete composite construction gained an extensive receiving around the globe. Considering the fact that R.C.C construction is most suitable and economic for low-rise construction so it is used in framing system in most structures. However; increased dead load, span restriction, less stiffness and risky formwork makes R.C.C construction uneconomical and not suitable when it comes to intermediate to high-rise buildings. One Basement and 11 storeys existing building has been analyzed and comparison has been made between R.CC structure and concrete steel composite columns. Equivalent Static non -linear analysis was performed in X and Y direction by using Etabs 2017 software which results that encased composite columns construction cost is more than R.C.C columns but on the other hand encased composite columns has more floor area, the storey shear is more, story drift is less, storey displacement is less, in conventional R.C.C structures, storey shear is less in R.C.C conventional structure. Therefore; this research aims to analyze and to learn This research is an effort to learn cost effectiveness, increased or decreased stiffness and change on functionality of composite construction for intermediate to high-rise buildings in Pakistan. A Base + Ground +11 storey commercial building was selected for this study. Comparison is done between conventional R.C.C structure and Encased Composite column structure. Equivalent Static non-linear analysis was performed using ETABS 2017 software. Although for Base + Ground + 11 storey building the construction cost is 7.7% more than R.C.C structure but encased composite column building has 13.013% more floor area. This increased floor area will help to settle the cost difference between two structures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混凝土与钢组合柱建筑结构的经济与功能可行性
钢-混凝土组合柱对现代建筑有着广泛的影响。钢-混凝土组合结构的快速增长大大减少了传统钢筋水泥混凝土(R.C.C)以及其他钢结构实践的使用。钢-混凝土组合结构在全球范围内得到了广泛的接受。考虑到钢筋混凝土结构最适合和经济的低层建筑,因此在大多数结构中采用框架体系。然而;自重增大、跨距限制、刚度小、模板风险大,使得钢筋混凝土施工不经济,不适用于中高层建筑。对一层地下室和11层既有建筑进行了分析,并对钢筋混凝土结构与混凝土钢组合柱进行了比较。采用Etabs 2017软件进行X、Y方向等效静力非线性分析,结果表明:围护组合柱的施工成本高于钢筋混凝土柱,但另一方面围护组合柱的建筑面积更大,层剪力更大,层位移更小,在常规钢筋混凝土结构中,围护组合柱的层剪力更小。因此;本研究旨在分析和学习。本研究旨在了解巴基斯坦中高层建筑复合结构的成本效益,增加或减少刚度和功能变化。本研究选择了一座基础+地面+11层的商业建筑。对常规钢筋混凝土结构与围合柱结构进行了比较。采用ETABS 2017软件进行等效静态非线性分析。虽然基础+地面+ 11层建筑的建筑成本比钢筋混凝土结构高出7.7%,但封闭式组合柱建筑的建筑面积却高出13.013%。增加的建筑面积将有助于解决两种结构之间的成本差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conformance and Performance Evaluation of Land Use Plan of Yirba Town Performance of Simplified Damage-Based Concrete Models in Seismic Applications Pavement Service Life Prediction with PLAXIS 3D in Bangladesh Surface-Modified Nanoclays for Enhancing Resistance to Moisture Damage in Hot Mix Asphalt Structural Performance Evaluation of Diversion Weir Structure: Case Study of Basaka Small Scale Irrigation Scheme, Oromia, Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1