Listening to Red

Q4 Arts and Humanities Kronos Pub Date : 2016-11-01 DOI:10.17159/2309-9585/2016/V42A8
Sinazo Mtshemla, G. Minkley, Helena Pohlandt-Mccormick
{"title":"Listening to Red","authors":"Sinazo Mtshemla, G. Minkley, Helena Pohlandt-Mccormick","doi":"10.17159/2309-9585/2016/V42A8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following a distinction John Mowitt draws between hearing (and phonics), and listening (and sonics), this article argues that the dominant notion of listening to sound was determined by the disciplinary framework of South African history and by the deployment of a cinematic documentary apparatus, both of which have served to disable the act of listening. The conditions of this hearing, and a deafness to a reduced or bracketed listening (Chion via Schaeffer) that would enable us to think the post in post-apartheid differently, is thus at the centre of our concerns here. We stage a series of screenings of expected possible soundtracks for Simon Gush’s film and installation Red, simultaneously tracking the ways that sound – and particularly music and dialogue – can be shown to hold a certain way of thinking both the political history of South Africa and the politics of South African history. We conclude by listening more closely to hiss and murmur in the soundtrack to Red and suggest this has major implications for considering ways of thinking and knowing.","PeriodicalId":53088,"journal":{"name":"Kronos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kronos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-9585/2016/V42A8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following a distinction John Mowitt draws between hearing (and phonics), and listening (and sonics), this article argues that the dominant notion of listening to sound was determined by the disciplinary framework of South African history and by the deployment of a cinematic documentary apparatus, both of which have served to disable the act of listening. The conditions of this hearing, and a deafness to a reduced or bracketed listening (Chion via Schaeffer) that would enable us to think the post in post-apartheid differently, is thus at the centre of our concerns here. We stage a series of screenings of expected possible soundtracks for Simon Gush’s film and installation Red, simultaneously tracking the ways that sound – and particularly music and dialogue – can be shown to hold a certain way of thinking both the political history of South Africa and the politics of South African history. We conclude by listening more closely to hiss and murmur in the soundtrack to Red and suggest this has major implications for considering ways of thinking and knowing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
听瑞德
根据John Mowitt对听力(和语音)和听力(和声学)的区分,本文认为,听声音的主要概念是由南非历史的学科框架和电影纪录片设备的部署决定的,这两者都有助于禁止听的行为。因此,我们在这里关注的中心是这种倾听的条件,以及对减少的或被纳入范围的倾听的耳聋,这将使我们能够以不同的方式思考后种族隔离时期的职位。我们为西蒙·古什的电影和装置作品《红色》放映了一系列可能的原声,同时追踪声音——尤其是音乐和对话——可以被显示为一种思考南非政治历史和南非政治历史的方式。最后,我们更仔细地聆听《Red》原声中的嘶嘶声和杂音,并认为这对思考和认知的方式具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kronos
Kronos Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Our Stories: Cartography of a Conflict Domination, Collaboration and Conflict in Cabo Delgado's History of Extractivism Public Culture, Sociality, and Listening to Jazz: Aural Memorialisation in the Time of COVID A Mercy Oral/Aural: Pastness and Sound as Medium and Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1