{"title":"Comparative Analysis of SMEs Intensity in Ukraine and Indonesia Using FIS Approach","authors":"Evi Thelia Sari, Vitalli Gryga","doi":"10.5709/ce.1897-9254.499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to describe and examine the development of SMEs in Ukraine and Indonesia based on productivity factors of SMEs development measured SMEs contribution to the country’s GDP. The study is based on data from 2000 to 2014, on number of SMEs, contribution of SMEs to GDP, labor in SMEs sectors, exports and import contributions to GDP of each country. Under complex data with uncertainty, Fuzzy Inference System (FIS) was applied to modelling process in estimating the differences between SMEs development in Ukraine and Indonesia. FIS models show the needs to improve policies on SMEs in each country of this study. We found that SMEs intensity development in Ukraine needs more SMEs to increase contribution to GDP and stipulate economic growth. While in Indonesia, growth in quantities of either labors or numbers of SMEs can be problematic, so it should focus on labors quality. Trade openness e.g., ratio export and import to GDP, shows that while Ukraine’s SMEs contribution to GDP is lower, the ratio of Export and Import to GDP is increasing. Whereas Indonesia’s ratio of export and import to GDP increases along with the SMEs contribution to GDP. The policies to increase the intensity development of SMEs in both countries should focus on increasing the quality of labors hired in SMEs, increasing the numbers of SMEs, reviewing and selecting the commodities that are prioritized to export and import in enhancing the ratio of export and import to GDP.","PeriodicalId":44824,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to describe and examine the development of SMEs in Ukraine and Indonesia based on productivity factors of SMEs development measured SMEs contribution to the country’s GDP. The study is based on data from 2000 to 2014, on number of SMEs, contribution of SMEs to GDP, labor in SMEs sectors, exports and import contributions to GDP of each country. Under complex data with uncertainty, Fuzzy Inference System (FIS) was applied to modelling process in estimating the differences between SMEs development in Ukraine and Indonesia. FIS models show the needs to improve policies on SMEs in each country of this study. We found that SMEs intensity development in Ukraine needs more SMEs to increase contribution to GDP and stipulate economic growth. While in Indonesia, growth in quantities of either labors or numbers of SMEs can be problematic, so it should focus on labors quality. Trade openness e.g., ratio export and import to GDP, shows that while Ukraine’s SMEs contribution to GDP is lower, the ratio of Export and Import to GDP is increasing. Whereas Indonesia’s ratio of export and import to GDP increases along with the SMEs contribution to GDP. The policies to increase the intensity development of SMEs in both countries should focus on increasing the quality of labors hired in SMEs, increasing the numbers of SMEs, reviewing and selecting the commodities that are prioritized to export and import in enhancing the ratio of export and import to GDP.
期刊介绍:
The mission of the Contemporary Economics is to publish advanced theoretical and empirical research in economics, finance, accounting and management with the noticeable contribution and impact to the development of those disciplines and preferably with practice relevancies. All entirety of methods is desirable, including a falsification of conventional understanding, theory building through inductive or qualitative research, first empirical testing of a theory, meta-analysis with theoretical implications, constructive replication that clarifies the boundaries or range of a theory for theoretical research as well as qualitative, quantitative, field, laboratory, meta-analytic, and combination for an empirical research. This clear priority for comprehensive manuscripts containing a methodology-based theoretical and empirical research with implications and recommendations for policymaking does not exclude manuscripts entirely focused on theory or methodology. Manuscripts that raise significant, actual topics of international relevance will be highly appreciated. The interdisciplinary approach including – besides economic, financial, accounting or managerial –also other aspects, is welcomed.