Effects of flavonoid rich fruits on hypertension in adults: a systematic review.

L. Ellwood, Gizemnur Torun, Z. Bahar, R. Fernandez
{"title":"Effects of flavonoid rich fruits on hypertension in adults: a systematic review.","authors":"L. Ellwood, Gizemnur Torun, Z. Bahar, R. Fernandez","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nThe objective of this systematic review was to synthesize the best available research evidence on the effectiveness of flavonoid rich fruits in the treatment of hypertension.\n\n\nINTRODUCTION\nHypertension is a serious public health concern as it contributes to a significant burden of disease, attributable for millions of deaths globally. Complementary therapies including flavonoids have generated interest in assisting the treatment of hypertension. Flavonoids are a type of polyphenol abundant in fruits and a growing body of evidence suggests antihypertensive effects of the flavonoids due to its antioxidant properties. To date, no systematic review has been performed to collate the evidence on the effects of flavonoid rich fruits on hypertension in adults.\n\n\nINCLUSION CRITERIA\nThis systematic review included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the administration of any type of flavonoid rich fruit or equivalent supplement with a placebo or other intervention in adults with hypertension. Trials that measured blood pressure using objective outcome measures such as a manual mercury sphygmomanometer were included. Studies that did not specify the flavonoid component of the fruit or fruit supplement were excluded in the review. Secondary outcomes, including change in weight, blood glucose level, triglycerides and total blood cholesterol levels were also assessed.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA three-step search was undertaken, including a comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Trials (CENTRAL) and CINAHL databases, in September 2018. We also searched Dissertation Abstracts International, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, MedNar and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify unpublished studies. The title and abstracts of the studies were reviewed by two independent reviewers against the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The methodological quality of the potential studies for inclusion were assessed using the critical appraisal checklist for randomized controlled trials as recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Data were pooled in a statistical meta-analysis model. Subgroup-analysis according to type of intervention and length of intervention period was performed. Where statistical pooling was not possible, the findings have been presented in a narrative form.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFifteen randomized controlled trials involving 572 participants were included in the review. The subclasses of flavonoids assessed included: anthocyanins, naringin, narirutin and flavan-3-ols. The overall methodological quality of the trials was high. Six trials investigated the effect of the flavonoid intervention on blood pressure within four weeks. Meta-analysis of five of the trials demonstrated evidence of no effect of flavonoids on systolic or diastolic blood pressure when compared to placebo (systolic mean difference = -1.02, 95% CI -3.12, 1.07; p = 0.34, I = 0%; diastolic mean difference = -0.90, 95% CI -2.10, 0.31; p = 0.15, I = 0%). Similarly, pooled results from two cross-over RCTs with two-timed dosed interventions in a 24-hour period demonstrated evidence of no effect on a reduction in diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.38) but did reveal evidence of a reduction in systolic blood pressure (p = 0). Six trials that assessed blood pressure following the flavonoid intervention at more than four weeks follow-up demonstrated evidence of no effect on either systolic (mean difference = -0.95, 95%CI -3.58, 1.68; p = 0.478, I = 0%) or diastolic blood pressure (mean difference = 0.86, 95%CI -1.11, 2.82; p = 0.393, I = 0%).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe findings from this systematic review should be interpreted with caution, given that the results are obtained from single-center trials with small sample sizes. Given the results provided in this review, there is evidence of no effect of flavonoids on systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Further robust randomized controlled trials using sample sizes based on power calculations are needed to provide evidence for the use of flavonoid rich fruits for the management of hypertension.","PeriodicalId":73539,"journal":{"name":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize the best available research evidence on the effectiveness of flavonoid rich fruits in the treatment of hypertension. INTRODUCTION Hypertension is a serious public health concern as it contributes to a significant burden of disease, attributable for millions of deaths globally. Complementary therapies including flavonoids have generated interest in assisting the treatment of hypertension. Flavonoids are a type of polyphenol abundant in fruits and a growing body of evidence suggests antihypertensive effects of the flavonoids due to its antioxidant properties. To date, no systematic review has been performed to collate the evidence on the effects of flavonoid rich fruits on hypertension in adults. INCLUSION CRITERIA This systematic review included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the administration of any type of flavonoid rich fruit or equivalent supplement with a placebo or other intervention in adults with hypertension. Trials that measured blood pressure using objective outcome measures such as a manual mercury sphygmomanometer were included. Studies that did not specify the flavonoid component of the fruit or fruit supplement were excluded in the review. Secondary outcomes, including change in weight, blood glucose level, triglycerides and total blood cholesterol levels were also assessed. METHODS A three-step search was undertaken, including a comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Trials (CENTRAL) and CINAHL databases, in September 2018. We also searched Dissertation Abstracts International, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, MedNar and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify unpublished studies. The title and abstracts of the studies were reviewed by two independent reviewers against the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The methodological quality of the potential studies for inclusion were assessed using the critical appraisal checklist for randomized controlled trials as recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Data were pooled in a statistical meta-analysis model. Subgroup-analysis according to type of intervention and length of intervention period was performed. Where statistical pooling was not possible, the findings have been presented in a narrative form. RESULTS Fifteen randomized controlled trials involving 572 participants were included in the review. The subclasses of flavonoids assessed included: anthocyanins, naringin, narirutin and flavan-3-ols. The overall methodological quality of the trials was high. Six trials investigated the effect of the flavonoid intervention on blood pressure within four weeks. Meta-analysis of five of the trials demonstrated evidence of no effect of flavonoids on systolic or diastolic blood pressure when compared to placebo (systolic mean difference = -1.02, 95% CI -3.12, 1.07; p = 0.34, I = 0%; diastolic mean difference = -0.90, 95% CI -2.10, 0.31; p = 0.15, I = 0%). Similarly, pooled results from two cross-over RCTs with two-timed dosed interventions in a 24-hour period demonstrated evidence of no effect on a reduction in diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.38) but did reveal evidence of a reduction in systolic blood pressure (p = 0). Six trials that assessed blood pressure following the flavonoid intervention at more than four weeks follow-up demonstrated evidence of no effect on either systolic (mean difference = -0.95, 95%CI -3.58, 1.68; p = 0.478, I = 0%) or diastolic blood pressure (mean difference = 0.86, 95%CI -1.11, 2.82; p = 0.393, I = 0%). CONCLUSIONS The findings from this systematic review should be interpreted with caution, given that the results are obtained from single-center trials with small sample sizes. Given the results provided in this review, there is evidence of no effect of flavonoids on systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Further robust randomized controlled trials using sample sizes based on power calculations are needed to provide evidence for the use of flavonoid rich fruits for the management of hypertension.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
富含类黄酮的水果对成人高血压的影响:一项系统综述。
目的对富含类黄酮的水果治疗高血压的有效性进行系统综述。高血压是一个严重的公共卫生问题,因为它是造成全球数百万人死亡的重要疾病负担。包括类黄酮在内的辅助疗法已引起人们对协助治疗高血压的兴趣。黄酮类化合物是水果中富含的一种多酚,越来越多的证据表明,由于其抗氧化特性,黄酮类化合物具有抗高血压作用。到目前为止,还没有系统的综述来整理富含类黄酮的水果对成人高血压的影响。纳入标准:本系统综述仅纳入随机对照试验(RCTs),比较任何类型的富含类黄酮的水果或等效补充剂与安慰剂或其他干预措施对高血压成人的影响。使用客观结果测量方法(如手动水银血压计)测量血压的试验被纳入研究。没有明确指明水果或水果补充剂中黄酮类成分的研究被排除在综述之外。次要结果,包括体重、血糖水平、甘油三酯和总血胆固醇水平的变化也被评估。方法于2018年9月对MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane Trials (CENTRAL)和CINAHL数据库进行三步检索。我们还检索了Dissertation Abstracts International、ProQuest Dissertation and Theses、MedNar和ClinicalTrials.gov,以确定未发表的研究。研究的标题和摘要由两名独立的审稿人根据纳入/排除标准进行审查。采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所推荐的随机对照试验关键评估清单对纳入的潜在研究的方法学质量进行评估。数据汇总在统计荟萃分析模型中。按干预类型和干预时间长短进行亚组分析。在无法进行统计汇总的情况下,调查结果以叙述形式提出。结果纳入15项随机对照试验,572名受试者。评估的黄酮类化合物亚类包括:花青素、柚皮苷、水杨柳素和黄烷-3-醇。试验的总体方法学质量很高。六项试验调查了类黄酮干预在四周内对血压的影响。五项试验的荟萃分析显示,与安慰剂相比,黄酮类化合物对收缩压或舒张压没有影响(收缩压平均差= -1.02,95% CI -3.12, 1.07;p = 0.34, I = 0%;舒张平均差= -0.90,95% CI -2.10, 0.31;p = 0.15, I = 0%)。同样,24小时内两次给药干预的两项交叉随机对照试验的汇总结果显示,舒张压的降低没有效果(p = 0.38),但收缩压的降低有证据(p = 0)。六项评估黄酮类干预后血压的试验在超过四周的随访中显示,对两种收缩压均无影响(平均差异= -0.95,95%CI -3.58, 1.68;p = 0.478, I = 0%)或舒张压(平均差值= 0.86,95%CI -1.11, 2.82;p = 0.393, I = 0%)。结论:本系统综述的结果来自小样本量的单中心试验,因此应谨慎解读。鉴于本综述提供的结果,有证据表明黄酮类化合物对收缩压和舒张压没有影响。需要进一步使用基于功率计算的样本量进行可靠的随机对照试验,为使用富含类黄酮的水果治疗高血压提供证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Approaches to implementing individual placement and support in the health and welfare sectors: a scoping review protocol. Retention of doctors in emergency medicine: a scoping review protocol. Evaluations of health care delivery models in Australia: a scoping review protocol. Meaningful and culturally appropriate palliative care for Chinese immigrants with a terminal condition: a qualitative systematic review protocol. Experiences of outdoor nature-based therapeutic recreation programs for persons with a mental illness: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1