Promoting informed consent in a children's hospital in Tabriz, Iran: a best practice implementation project.

N. Kabiri, S. Hajebrahimi, Gisoo Alizadeh, Solmaz Azimzadeh, Nayyereh Farajzadeh, Amin Talebpour
{"title":"Promoting informed consent in a children's hospital in Tabriz, Iran: a best practice implementation project.","authors":"N. Kabiri, S. Hajebrahimi, Gisoo Alizadeh, Solmaz Azimzadeh, Nayyereh Farajzadeh, Amin Talebpour","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nInformed consent is a continuous and dynamic process. It is a crucial part of healthcare procedures that becomes more complex in a pediatric clinical practice, where parents must make decisions for their children.\n\n\nOBJECTIVES\nThe aim of this implementation project was to evaluate the current practice and implement the best practice related to obtaining informed consent in a children's hospital in Tabriz, Iran.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA clinical audit was undertaken using the JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (JBI PACES) tool. Five audit criteria representing the best-practice recommendations for informed consent were used. A baseline audit was conducted, followed by the implementation of multiple strategies. The project was finalized with a follow-up audit to determine change in practice.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe compliance rate of all criteria improved from baseline to follow-up audit. Criteria 1 (obtaining informed consent prior to all nursing procedures) and 5 (provision of information related to the necessity of the treatment) reached 97% compliance in the follow-up cycle. Criterion 4 (provision of information related to the nature and effect of the treatment) achieved 74% compliance. Both criteria 2 and 3 (provision of information related to alternative treatments and consequences of refusing treatment) reached 57% in the follow-up cycle. To improve compliance, meetings were organized with the heads of departments, nurses and residents regarding informed consent. Also, staff were encouraged to report cases where informed consent was not obtained.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe audit results indicated an improvement in obtaining informed consent in the included departments. The interventions that were employed can facilitate the implementation of evidence into clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":73539,"journal":{"name":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Informed consent is a continuous and dynamic process. It is a crucial part of healthcare procedures that becomes more complex in a pediatric clinical practice, where parents must make decisions for their children. OBJECTIVES The aim of this implementation project was to evaluate the current practice and implement the best practice related to obtaining informed consent in a children's hospital in Tabriz, Iran. METHODS A clinical audit was undertaken using the JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (JBI PACES) tool. Five audit criteria representing the best-practice recommendations for informed consent were used. A baseline audit was conducted, followed by the implementation of multiple strategies. The project was finalized with a follow-up audit to determine change in practice. RESULTS The compliance rate of all criteria improved from baseline to follow-up audit. Criteria 1 (obtaining informed consent prior to all nursing procedures) and 5 (provision of information related to the necessity of the treatment) reached 97% compliance in the follow-up cycle. Criterion 4 (provision of information related to the nature and effect of the treatment) achieved 74% compliance. Both criteria 2 and 3 (provision of information related to alternative treatments and consequences of refusing treatment) reached 57% in the follow-up cycle. To improve compliance, meetings were organized with the heads of departments, nurses and residents regarding informed consent. Also, staff were encouraged to report cases where informed consent was not obtained. CONCLUSION The audit results indicated an improvement in obtaining informed consent in the included departments. The interventions that were employed can facilitate the implementation of evidence into clinical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在伊朗大不里士的一家儿童医院促进知情同意:最佳做法实施项目。
知情同意是一个持续的动态过程。这是医疗程序的一个关键部分,在儿科临床实践中变得更加复杂,父母必须为他们的孩子做出决定。目的:本实施项目的目的是评估伊朗大不里士(Tabriz)一家儿童医院在获得知情同意方面的现行做法,并实施最佳做法。方法采用JBI临床证据系统实际应用(JBI PACES)工具进行临床审核。采用了代表知情同意最佳做法建议的五项审计标准。进行了基线审计,然后实施了多项战略。该项目最后进行了后续审计,以确定实践中的变化。结果从基线到随访,各指标的符合率均有提高。标准1(在所有护理程序之前获得知情同意)和标准5(提供与治疗必要性相关的信息)在随访周期中达到97%的依从性。标准4(提供有关治疗性质和效果的信息)达到74%的依从性。在随访周期中,标准2和标准3(提供有关替代治疗和拒绝治疗后果的信息)均达到57%。为了提高依从性,组织了与科室负责人、护士和住院医生关于知情同意的会议。此外,还鼓励工作人员报告未取得知情同意的情况。结论审计结果表明,纳入科室在知情同意获取方面有所改善。所采用的干预措施可以促进证据在临床实践中的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Approaches to implementing individual placement and support in the health and welfare sectors: a scoping review protocol. Retention of doctors in emergency medicine: a scoping review protocol. Evaluations of health care delivery models in Australia: a scoping review protocol. Meaningful and culturally appropriate palliative care for Chinese immigrants with a terminal condition: a qualitative systematic review protocol. Experiences of outdoor nature-based therapeutic recreation programs for persons with a mental illness: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1