Half-hearted Inclusivism: The Theological Doctrine of Salvation in the Document of Lumen Gentium and the Fate of Others

M. Ichwan
{"title":"Half-hearted Inclusivism: The Theological Doctrine of Salvation in the Document of Lumen Gentium and the Fate of Others","authors":"M. Ichwan","doi":"10.21580/teo.2022.33.2.16654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the salvation concept in the Lumen Gentium document. The concept of salvation in the Christian tradition is based not only on the cross but also on the Lumen Gentium document, which guarantees safety for adherents of religions other than Christianity. This article aims to explain the doctrine of Christian Salvation through the Lumen Gentium document, analyze the debates and variations of views that exist in Christian theology regarding the fate of adherents of other religions, and look at the responses of Christian churches and theologians to these challenges and dilemmas about the fate of others. The approach used in writing this article is an analysis of the literature, which involves the study of theology, the study of ecclesiastical documents, and the study of the views of Christian theologians on soteriology. This article reveals that soteriology emphasizes the importance of explicit faith in Christ as the only way of Salvation stated in Christian teachings. However, there are debates and various views in Christian theology regarding the fate of those who embrace other religions. Some theologians try to embrace religious diversity by arguing that Salvation can be found in other religions through the grace of God working through Christ without explicit knowledge of Him. Meanwhile, some maintain the exclusive view that faith in Christ is the only way to Salvation. Soteriology shows that faith in Christ as the work of Salvation accomplished through His death on the Cross is the core of the Christian understanding of Salvation. But in the context of the fate of others, there are various views in Christian theology. Based on this fact, the inclusivism built by the Lumen Gentium document seems half-hearted. Therefore a healthy theological dialogue and more profound understanding are needed to respond to this complex challenge and to promote an inclusive experience and widespread love for all human beings.","PeriodicalId":56255,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Theologia","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Theologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21580/teo.2022.33.2.16654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the salvation concept in the Lumen Gentium document. The concept of salvation in the Christian tradition is based not only on the cross but also on the Lumen Gentium document, which guarantees safety for adherents of religions other than Christianity. This article aims to explain the doctrine of Christian Salvation through the Lumen Gentium document, analyze the debates and variations of views that exist in Christian theology regarding the fate of adherents of other religions, and look at the responses of Christian churches and theologians to these challenges and dilemmas about the fate of others. The approach used in writing this article is an analysis of the literature, which involves the study of theology, the study of ecclesiastical documents, and the study of the views of Christian theologians on soteriology. This article reveals that soteriology emphasizes the importance of explicit faith in Christ as the only way of Salvation stated in Christian teachings. However, there are debates and various views in Christian theology regarding the fate of those who embrace other religions. Some theologians try to embrace religious diversity by arguing that Salvation can be found in other religions through the grace of God working through Christ without explicit knowledge of Him. Meanwhile, some maintain the exclusive view that faith in Christ is the only way to Salvation. Soteriology shows that faith in Christ as the work of Salvation accomplished through His death on the Cross is the core of the Christian understanding of Salvation. But in the context of the fate of others, there are various views in Christian theology. Based on this fact, the inclusivism built by the Lumen Gentium document seems half-hearted. Therefore a healthy theological dialogue and more profound understanding are needed to respond to this complex challenge and to promote an inclusive experience and widespread love for all human beings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
半心半意的包容主义:《万有之光与他人命运》文件中的救赎神学教义
本文考察了Lumen Gentium文件中的救赎概念。基督教传统中救赎的概念不仅以十字架为基础,而且也以保证基督教以外宗教信徒的安全的Lumen Gentium文件为基础。本文旨在通过Lumen Gentium文件解释基督教救赎的教义,分析基督教神学中存在的关于其他宗教信徒命运的争论和观点的变化,并看看基督教教会和神学家对这些关于他人命运的挑战和困境的回应。写作这篇文章所用的方法是对文献的分析,包括对神学的研究,对教会文献的研究,以及对基督教神学家对救赎论的观点的研究。这篇文章揭示了救赎论强调明确信仰基督的重要性,这是基督教教义中所说的唯一得救之道。然而,在基督教神学中,关于那些信奉其他宗教的人的命运存在争论和各种观点。一些神学家试图接受宗教的多样性,他们认为,在其他宗教中,即使不明确认识基督,也可以通过上帝的恩典找到救恩。与此同时,有些人坚持认为信仰基督是得救的唯一途径。救赎论表明,对基督的信仰是通过他在十字架上的死而完成的救赎工作,这是基督教对救赎理解的核心。但在他人命运的背景下,基督教神学中有各种各样的观点。基于这一事实,Lumen Gentium文件所建立的包容主义似乎是半心半意的。因此,需要进行健康的神学对话和更深刻的理解,以应对这一复杂的挑战,并促进包容的经验和对全人类的广泛爱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Epistemology of Hadith: Orientation for Chapters Compilation in the Kutub Sittah Henry Armand Giroux's Thought: An Essential Component of Critical Pedagogy in Religions Authority and Ulama In Aceh: The Role of Dayah Ulama In Contemporary Aceh Religious Practices Contemporary Qur’anic Lithography in Indonesia: Aesthetic of Reception of the Marble Al-Qur’an Manuscript Half-hearted Inclusivism: The Theological Doctrine of Salvation in the Document of Lumen Gentium and the Fate of Others
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1