Update to U.S. National Response Team's Abandoned Vessels Authorities and Best Practices Guidance

Rebecca J. Brooks
{"title":"Update to U.S. National Response Team's Abandoned Vessels Authorities and Best Practices Guidance","authors":"Rebecca J. Brooks","doi":"10.7901/2169-3358-2021.1.689320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The U.S. National Response Team promulgated an interagency guidance document entitled “Abandoned Vessel Authorities and Best Practices Guidance” (AVG) in 2014 to address a myriad of questions that the Federal On-Scene Coordinators and broader response community tend to face when mitigating threats caused by abandoned or derelict vessels. This document compiles information surrounding existing laws, policies, and best practices to inform and advise responders without bogging them down in “legalese” or forcing them to search from document to document to find all the relevant information. In the aftermath of the 2017 Atlantic Hurricane Season and associated responses, the National Response Team tasked its Preparedness Committee to reopen the 2014 AVG to ensure the document addressed the challenges that were brought to light amid the responses. The Committee chartered a working group to systematically review and update this document and incorporate the latest pertinent policy changes, including those from Federal Emergency Management Agency to ensure that it most thoroughly addressed the gamut of issues a responder may come up against in the arena of abandoned (or derelict, or displaced) vessel management. The updated AVG was completed and approved by the NRT in 2020 and is posted to the NRT website. Major updates include: Considerations for long-term storage and disposal;Clarification on foreign-flagged vessel nuances;Information for responders to consider regarding contaminants other than those covered under NCP/ESF constructs (e.g. if typical response authorities do not cover a scenario, what options might the responder still leverage);An additional section addressing nuances of managing multiple vessel casualties at once, either due to a natural disaster or an act or omission from a third party; andImportant differences between National Contingency Plan and Stafford Act funded/organized responses.\n This paper dives into the rationale for making changes, the benefits of additions made, the processes and methodologies for undertaking updates, and major elements of the AVG to provide a snapshot of the guidance it affords the reader.","PeriodicalId":14447,"journal":{"name":"International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7901/2169-3358-2021.1.689320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The U.S. National Response Team promulgated an interagency guidance document entitled “Abandoned Vessel Authorities and Best Practices Guidance” (AVG) in 2014 to address a myriad of questions that the Federal On-Scene Coordinators and broader response community tend to face when mitigating threats caused by abandoned or derelict vessels. This document compiles information surrounding existing laws, policies, and best practices to inform and advise responders without bogging them down in “legalese” or forcing them to search from document to document to find all the relevant information. In the aftermath of the 2017 Atlantic Hurricane Season and associated responses, the National Response Team tasked its Preparedness Committee to reopen the 2014 AVG to ensure the document addressed the challenges that were brought to light amid the responses. The Committee chartered a working group to systematically review and update this document and incorporate the latest pertinent policy changes, including those from Federal Emergency Management Agency to ensure that it most thoroughly addressed the gamut of issues a responder may come up against in the arena of abandoned (or derelict, or displaced) vessel management. The updated AVG was completed and approved by the NRT in 2020 and is posted to the NRT website. Major updates include: Considerations for long-term storage and disposal;Clarification on foreign-flagged vessel nuances;Information for responders to consider regarding contaminants other than those covered under NCP/ESF constructs (e.g. if typical response authorities do not cover a scenario, what options might the responder still leverage);An additional section addressing nuances of managing multiple vessel casualties at once, either due to a natural disaster or an act or omission from a third party; andImportant differences between National Contingency Plan and Stafford Act funded/organized responses. This paper dives into the rationale for making changes, the benefits of additions made, the processes and methodologies for undertaking updates, and major elements of the AVG to provide a snapshot of the guidance it affords the reader.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
更新美国国家应对小组的废弃船只当局和最佳实践指南
2014年,美国国家应急小组发布了一份名为“废弃船舶管理和最佳实践指南”(AVG)的跨部门指导文件,以解决联邦现场协调员和更广泛的响应社区在减轻废弃或废弃船舶造成的威胁时往往面临的无数问题。本文档汇编了围绕现有法律、政策和最佳实践的信息,以告知和建议响应者,而不会使他们陷入“法律术语”,也不会迫使他们从一个文档搜索到另一个文档以查找所有相关信息。在2017年大西洋飓风季节和相关响应之后,国家响应小组要求其准备委员会重新启动2014年的AVG,以确保该文件解决了在响应中暴露的挑战。委员会授权一个工作组系统地审查和更新该文件,并纳入最新的相关政策变化,包括联邦紧急事务管理局的政策变化,以确保该文件最彻底地解决响应者在废弃(或遗弃或流离失所)船只管理领域可能遇到的各种问题。更新后的AVG于2020年完成并由NRT批准,并发布在NRT网站上。主要更新包括:对于长期储存和处置的考虑;对外国国旗船舶的细微差别的澄清;对于NCP/ESF结构所涵盖的污染物以外的其他污染物,应急人员需要考虑的信息(例如,如果典型的应急当局不涵盖某个场景,应急人员仍可以利用哪些选项);国家应急计划和斯塔福德法案资助/组织的反应之间的重要区别。本文深入探讨了进行更改的基本原理,添加的好处,进行更新的过程和方法,以及AVG的主要元素,以提供它为读者提供的指导的快照。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From the deep ocean to the coasts and estuaries through the shelf: linking coastal response to a deep blow-out Case Study of a SCAT Survey and Successful Remediation Strategy by Mechanical Mixing of a Fuel Oil Spill into a Mountain Stream Using Oil Spill Modeling in Oil Spill Exercises and Drills In Situ Burn Testing of Weathered and Emulsified Crude Oils Historical Dispersant Use in U.S. Waters 1968–2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1