Quality Accreditation System for Indian Engineering Education Using Knowledge Management and System Dynamics
Abdul Razak Honnutagi, R. Sonar, S. Babu
{"title":"Quality Accreditation System for Indian Engineering Education Using Knowledge Management and System Dynamics","authors":"Abdul Razak Honnutagi, R. Sonar, S. Babu","doi":"10.4018/ijqaete.2012070105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The engineering education system of India is becoming increasingly complex due to reasons like unmanageable numbers of colleges affiliated to universities, wide spectrum of student quality, multi-boss system in management and conflicting interests of stakeholders. Since the Accreditation board of engineering and technology (ABET) of U.S., Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA) of U.S. and European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) of UK have been established; many other countries have developed their own version of national quality award (NQA) and accreditation systems. These NQAs and accreditation systems tend to follow the same general framework with different emphases on criterion. Since MBNQA has a prominent knowledge management (KM) component in it and EFQM has a strong mechanism of measuring outcomes/results, it’s attempted to develop a robust framework for Knowledge Quality Management (KQM) by integrating KM and outcome components into it using systems theory. The system dynamics (SD) approach is proposed for the visualization and analysis of quality assessment of undergraduate engineering education in India. Towards this, all possible attributes and indicators to study the interaction and interrelationship of various enablers and results have been identified. Causal loop diagrams (CLDs) and the integrated CLD for the entire proposed model enabling development of a system dynamics (SD) model is presented. DOI: 10.4018/ijqaete.2012070105 48 International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education, 2(3), 47-61, July-September 2012 Copyright © 2012, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited. produce engineers who are employable in the market or be entrepreneurs, most of the engineering institutes will be agents for enhancing the population of unemployed engineers. Engineering education system is of paramount importance in generating the technical manpower required for building a strong nation. The demand for engineers has been growing in India during the last few decades. This has resulted in various kinds of people setting up of a large number of colleges in India, offering a variety of programs to meet the demand. This process has been more or less motivated by financial gains. With the ongoing liberalization and globalization of the economy, more and more foreign universities/institutes are also trying to find foothold in the Indian educational space by entering into joint ventures with Indian universities/institutes. All these attempts no doubt have helped in improving the quantity side of the output, forcing the corresponding quality to suffer. As Vishwanadhan (2008) pointed out, the following issues may lead to deleterious effects in the Indian Engineering Education system (IEES). • Wide spectrum of student quality. • Lack of experienced faculty and their quality. • Mushrooming of colleges. • Location of colleges in remote places with non-proximity of industries. • Unmanageable number of colleges affiliated to a single university. • Multi-boss system-AICTE, state government, university and management. • Lack of appropriate performance measures. • Conflict about indicators of quality among experts. • Lack of proper methods of collecting, storage and analysis of information. • Inadequacy of accreditation process to: ◦ Make consensus about the validity of the process. ◦ Encourage continuous improvement. The society, the policy makers and the employers are really worried about this trend and there have been many attempts by the government and various other agencies to remedy the situation. The approaches and methods adopted to resolve these issues are very important in this situation, for the maintenance and improvement of quality standards of engineering education. One of the most commonly accepted procedure is accreditation based on objective assessments. A study of the present assessment methods of engineering programs such as Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) of US, National Board of Accreditation (NBA) of India, Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA) of US, European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) of UK was carried out to analyze and compare their capabilities in promoting quality in engineering education. The methods based on the linear thinking and mental models of policy makers and administrators are insufficient to analyze the performance related issues of Indian engineering education system. The insights gained helped to understand various important issues on accreditation processes and also the quality award excellence models of various other countries such as ABET, MBNQA, EFQM etc. motivated us for research towards KM based Quality Management. Vishwanadhan (2008) has also presented the analysis and assessment capabilities of present NBA process of engineering programs to strengthen this argument. An attempt was made to identify effective knowledge performance measures, corresponding enablers and inhibitors. Engineering education system is a growing field and to strengthen the system there is a need to effectively assess various engineering institutions. The identification of strong and weak functions (components) is important for quality education to achieve higher standards through continuous improvement. The integration of Knowledge Management (KM) and quality in engineering education seems to be critical. It was felt appropriate to develop a self assessing tool for quality in engineering education by incorporating systems theory and integrating 13 more pages are available in the full version of this document, which may be purchased using the \"Add to Cart\" button on the product's webpage: www.igi-global.com/article/quality-accreditation-systemindian-engineering/69792?camid=4v1 This title is available in InfoSci-Journals, InfoSci-Journal Disciplines Engineering, Natural, and Physical Science. Recommend this product to your librarian: www.igi-global.com/e-resources/libraryrecommendation/?id=2","PeriodicalId":13684,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Qual. Assur. Eng. Technol. Educ.","volume":"18 1","pages":"47-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Qual. Assur. Eng. Technol. Educ.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijqaete.2012070105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
The engineering education system of India is becoming increasingly complex due to reasons like unmanageable numbers of colleges affiliated to universities, wide spectrum of student quality, multi-boss system in management and conflicting interests of stakeholders. Since the Accreditation board of engineering and technology (ABET) of U.S., Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA) of U.S. and European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) of UK have been established; many other countries have developed their own version of national quality award (NQA) and accreditation systems. These NQAs and accreditation systems tend to follow the same general framework with different emphases on criterion. Since MBNQA has a prominent knowledge management (KM) component in it and EFQM has a strong mechanism of measuring outcomes/results, it’s attempted to develop a robust framework for Knowledge Quality Management (KQM) by integrating KM and outcome components into it using systems theory. The system dynamics (SD) approach is proposed for the visualization and analysis of quality assessment of undergraduate engineering education in India. Towards this, all possible attributes and indicators to study the interaction and interrelationship of various enablers and results have been identified. Causal loop diagrams (CLDs) and the integrated CLD for the entire proposed model enabling development of a system dynamics (SD) model is presented. DOI: 10.4018/ijqaete.2012070105 48 International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education, 2(3), 47-61, July-September 2012 Copyright © 2012, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited. produce engineers who are employable in the market or be entrepreneurs, most of the engineering institutes will be agents for enhancing the population of unemployed engineers. Engineering education system is of paramount importance in generating the technical manpower required for building a strong nation. The demand for engineers has been growing in India during the last few decades. This has resulted in various kinds of people setting up of a large number of colleges in India, offering a variety of programs to meet the demand. This process has been more or less motivated by financial gains. With the ongoing liberalization and globalization of the economy, more and more foreign universities/institutes are also trying to find foothold in the Indian educational space by entering into joint ventures with Indian universities/institutes. All these attempts no doubt have helped in improving the quantity side of the output, forcing the corresponding quality to suffer. As Vishwanadhan (2008) pointed out, the following issues may lead to deleterious effects in the Indian Engineering Education system (IEES). • Wide spectrum of student quality. • Lack of experienced faculty and their quality. • Mushrooming of colleges. • Location of colleges in remote places with non-proximity of industries. • Unmanageable number of colleges affiliated to a single university. • Multi-boss system-AICTE, state government, university and management. • Lack of appropriate performance measures. • Conflict about indicators of quality among experts. • Lack of proper methods of collecting, storage and analysis of information. • Inadequacy of accreditation process to: ◦ Make consensus about the validity of the process. ◦ Encourage continuous improvement. The society, the policy makers and the employers are really worried about this trend and there have been many attempts by the government and various other agencies to remedy the situation. The approaches and methods adopted to resolve these issues are very important in this situation, for the maintenance and improvement of quality standards of engineering education. One of the most commonly accepted procedure is accreditation based on objective assessments. A study of the present assessment methods of engineering programs such as Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) of US, National Board of Accreditation (NBA) of India, Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA) of US, European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) of UK was carried out to analyze and compare their capabilities in promoting quality in engineering education. The methods based on the linear thinking and mental models of policy makers and administrators are insufficient to analyze the performance related issues of Indian engineering education system. The insights gained helped to understand various important issues on accreditation processes and also the quality award excellence models of various other countries such as ABET, MBNQA, EFQM etc. motivated us for research towards KM based Quality Management. Vishwanadhan (2008) has also presented the analysis and assessment capabilities of present NBA process of engineering programs to strengthen this argument. An attempt was made to identify effective knowledge performance measures, corresponding enablers and inhibitors. Engineering education system is a growing field and to strengthen the system there is a need to effectively assess various engineering institutions. The identification of strong and weak functions (components) is important for quality education to achieve higher standards through continuous improvement. The integration of Knowledge Management (KM) and quality in engineering education seems to be critical. It was felt appropriate to develop a self assessing tool for quality in engineering education by incorporating systems theory and integrating 13 more pages are available in the full version of this document, which may be purchased using the "Add to Cart" button on the product's webpage: www.igi-global.com/article/quality-accreditation-systemindian-engineering/69792?camid=4v1 This title is available in InfoSci-Journals, InfoSci-Journal Disciplines Engineering, Natural, and Physical Science. Recommend this product to your librarian: www.igi-global.com/e-resources/libraryrecommendation/?id=2
运用知识管理和系统动力学的印度工程教育质量认证体系
印度的工程教育体系正变得越来越复杂,原因包括大学附属学院数量难以管理、学生素质参差不齐、管理上的多老板制度以及利益相关者的利益冲突。自美国工程技术认证委员会(ABET)、美国马尔科姆·鲍德里奇国家质量奖(MBNQA)和英国欧洲质量管理基金会(EFQM)成立以来;许多其他国家也建立了自己的国家质量奖和认证体系。这些核质量保证机构和认证体系往往遵循相同的总体框架,但对标准的侧重点不同。由于MBNQA具有突出的知识管理(KM)组件,而EFQM具有强大的测量结果/结果的机制,因此它试图通过使用系统理论将知识管理和结果组件集成到知识质量管理(KQM)中来开发一个健壮的框架。针对印度本科工程教育质量评价的可视化和分析,提出了系统动力学方法。为此,已确定了所有可能的属性和指标,以研究各种促成因素和结果的相互作用和相互关系。因果循环图(CLDs)和集成的CLD为整个提出的模型,使开发系统动力学(SD)模型被提出。DOI: 10.4018 / ijqaete。2012070105 48国际工程技术教育质量保证学报,2(3),47-61,2012年7- 9月版权所有©2012,IGI Global。未经IGI Global书面许可,禁止以印刷或电子形式复制或分发。生产可以在市场上就业的工程师或成为企业家,大多数工程学院将成为增加失业工程师人口的代理人。工程教育体系对于培养强国所需的技术人才至关重要。在过去几十年里,印度对工程师的需求一直在增长。这导致了各种各样的人在印度建立了大量的学院,提供各种各样的课程来满足需求。这一进程或多或少受到经济利益的推动。随着经济的不断自由化和全球化,越来越多的外国大学/机构也试图通过与印度大学/机构建立合资企业来在印度教育领域找到立足点。毫无疑问,所有这些尝试都有助于提高产出的数量方面,迫使相应的质量受到影响。正如Vishwanadhan(2008)所指出的,以下问题可能会导致印度工程教育系统(IEES)的有害影响。•广泛的学生素质。•缺乏经验丰富的教师及其素质。•大学如雨后春笋般涌现。•大学位于偏远地区,不靠近工业。•一所大学附属的学院数量难以管理。•多老板制aicte、州政府、大学、管理层。•缺乏适当的绩效衡量标准。•专家之间关于质量指标的冲突。•缺乏收集、储存和分析信息的适当方法。•认证过程的不足:◦对过程的有效性达成共识。鼓励持续改进。社会、政策制定者和雇主都非常担心这一趋势,政府和其他机构也做了很多努力来纠正这种情况。在这种情况下,解决这些问题的途径和方法对于维护和提高工程教育的质量标准至关重要。最普遍接受的程序之一是基于客观评估的认证。对美国工程技术认证委员会(ABET)、印度国家认证委员会(NBA)、美国马尔科姆·鲍德里奇国家质量奖(MBNQA)、英国欧洲质量管理基金会(EFQM)等工程专业现有的评估方法进行了研究,分析比较了它们在促进工程教育质量方面的能力。基于决策者和管理者的线性思维和心智模型的方法不足以分析印度工程教育系统的绩效相关问题。获得的见解有助于了解认证过程中的各种重要问题,以及其他国家的质量奖励卓越模式,如ABET, MBNQA, EFQM等,激励我们研究基于知识管理的质量管理。Vishwanadhan(2008)还提出了目前NBA工程项目过程的分析和评估能力,以加强这一论点。 试图确定有效的知识绩效指标,相应的促进因素和抑制因素。工程教育体系是一个不断发展的领域,要强化工程教育体系,就需要对各类工程院校进行有效的评估。强弱功能(成分)的识别对于素质教育通过持续改进达到更高的标准至关重要。在工程教育中,知识管理与质量的整合显得至关重要。我们认为,通过结合系统理论和整合13页以上的内容,开发一种工程教育质量自我评估工具是合适的,这些内容可以在本文档的完整版本中找到,可以通过产品网页上的“添加到购物车”按钮购买:www.igi-global.com/article/quality-accreditation-systemindian-engineering/69792?camid=4v1。本标题可在InfoSci-Journals, InfoSci-Journal journals, engineering, Natural, and Physical Science中找到。向您的图书管理员推荐此产品:www.igi-global.com/e-resources/libraryrecommendation/?id=2
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。