{"title":"In total smartness: the institutional logics perspective on the Internet of things and people","authors":"Seidali Kurtmollaiev","doi":"10.1080/10253866.2023.2172572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Following the institutional logics perspective and an inductive research design, this study is the first to outline the Internet of things and people as a new institutional order with a distinct logic. The rise of this new institutional logic is prompted by smart technology, which transforms the ideological field of technology and challenges consumers’ self-concepts. In counterbalancing attempts, consumers internalize those “non-smart” practices that assist in maintaining the self’s integrity and differentiate “Us” – humans from “Them” – smart things. In contrast to previous research describing the material as a passive carrier, this study provides evidence that the material can be the driving force behind the emergence of institutional logic.","PeriodicalId":47423,"journal":{"name":"Consumption Markets & Culture","volume":"8 1","pages":"258 - 279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consumption Markets & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2023.2172572","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT Following the institutional logics perspective and an inductive research design, this study is the first to outline the Internet of things and people as a new institutional order with a distinct logic. The rise of this new institutional logic is prompted by smart technology, which transforms the ideological field of technology and challenges consumers’ self-concepts. In counterbalancing attempts, consumers internalize those “non-smart” practices that assist in maintaining the self’s integrity and differentiate “Us” – humans from “Them” – smart things. In contrast to previous research describing the material as a passive carrier, this study provides evidence that the material can be the driving force behind the emergence of institutional logic.