The Whistleblowing Diamond: Considering Four Elements of Whistleblowing Intention

IF 2.5 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Abacus-A Journal of Accounting Finance and Business Studies Pub Date : 2023-02-08 DOI:10.47153/afs31.6252023
Dwi Defiantoro
{"title":"The Whistleblowing Diamond: Considering Four Elements of Whistleblowing Intention","authors":"Dwi Defiantoro","doi":"10.47153/afs31.6252023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We review how whistleblowing diamond factors affect whistleblowing intention which are moderated by perceived organizational support. This quantitative research was conducted using a case study survey method with a sample of 220 village officials in Minahasa Regency. This study uses the whistleblowing diamond theory, which explains four type of factors that can influence a whistleblower's intention to conduct whistleblowing, namely: pressure/incentives, opportunity, rationalization, and capability. This study found that the factors that significantly influenced whistleblowing intentions were opportunity, rationalization, and capability with a significance of p<0.05, 0.001, 0.004, and 0.033, respectively. Meanwhile, pressure and incentive factors proved not to significantly affect whistleblowing intentions, with a significance value of p>0.05, 0.779, and 0.924, respectively. This study also found that the moderating factor of perceived organizational support increased the influence of pressure, incentives, opportunity, rationalization, and capability on the intention to report violations with a significance value of 0.0001 to 0.005.","PeriodicalId":47285,"journal":{"name":"Abacus-A Journal of Accounting Finance and Business Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abacus-A Journal of Accounting Finance and Business Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47153/afs31.6252023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We review how whistleblowing diamond factors affect whistleblowing intention which are moderated by perceived organizational support. This quantitative research was conducted using a case study survey method with a sample of 220 village officials in Minahasa Regency. This study uses the whistleblowing diamond theory, which explains four type of factors that can influence a whistleblower's intention to conduct whistleblowing, namely: pressure/incentives, opportunity, rationalization, and capability. This study found that the factors that significantly influenced whistleblowing intentions were opportunity, rationalization, and capability with a significance of p<0.05, 0.001, 0.004, and 0.033, respectively. Meanwhile, pressure and incentive factors proved not to significantly affect whistleblowing intentions, with a significance value of p>0.05, 0.779, and 0.924, respectively. This study also found that the moderating factor of perceived organizational support increased the influence of pressure, incentives, opportunity, rationalization, and capability on the intention to report violations with a significance value of 0.0001 to 0.005.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
举报钻石:考虑举报意图的四个要素
我们回顾了检举钻石因素是如何影响检举意图的,而检举意图是由感知的组织支持来调节的。本定量研究采用个案研究调查法,以米纳哈沙县220名村官为样本进行。本研究采用了举报人的钻石理论,该理论解释了影响举报人举报意愿的四类因素,分别是:压力/激励、机会、合理化和能力。本研究发现,对检举意图有显著影响的因素为机会、合理化和能力,其显著性分别为p0.05、0.779和0.924。本研究还发现,组织支持感知的调节因子增加了压力、激励、机会、合理化和能力对违规举报意愿的影响,显著性值为0.0001 ~ 0.005。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Since 1965 Abacus has consistently provided a vehicle for the expression of independent and critical thought on matters of current academic and professional interest in accounting, finance and business. The journal reports current research; critically evaluates current developments in theory and practice; analyses the effects of the regulatory framework of accounting, finance and business; and explores alternatives to, and explanations of, past and current practices.
期刊最新文献
Boosting Government Assets as A Revenue Center: Risk and Treatment The Effect of Organizational Climate on Sell‐side Analyst Turnover and Performance Ex‐military Top Executives and Corporate Violations: Evidence from China Corporate Governance Reforms and Analyst Forecasts: International Evidence Analysts’ Earnings per Share Forecasts: The Effects of Forecast Uncertainty and Forecast Precision on Investor Judgements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1