Nursing assessment and management of incontinence among medical and surgical adult patients in a tertiary hospital: a best practice implementation project.

W. Trad, Kelli Flowers, Jennifer C. Caldwell, M. S. Sousa, Gia Vigh, L. Lizarondo, Julia Gaudin, Dianne Hooper, D. Parker
{"title":"Nursing assessment and management of incontinence among medical and surgical adult patients in a tertiary hospital: a best practice implementation project.","authors":"W. Trad, Kelli Flowers, Jennifer C. Caldwell, M. S. Sousa, Gia Vigh, L. Lizarondo, Julia Gaudin, Dianne Hooper, D. Parker","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nThe objectives of this implementation project were to review the nursing assessment and management of adult patients with urinary and fecal incontinence, and to develop local guidelines and ward-based continence assessment tools that can assist nursing staff in assessing and managing incontinence.\n\n\nINTRODUCTION\nUrinary or fecal incontinence in acute care hospitals is a growing issue that can lead to constipation, depression, breakdown of skin integrity, increased nursing home placement of elderly patients, increased length of hospital stay, and escalated healthcare costs. In many cases, incontinence can be treated and managed effectively; however, it is poorly understood and under-prioritized in many hospital settings.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA pre-post intervention chart audit was conducted and reviewed compliance against 10 best-practice criteria for incontinence assessment and management. Following baseline data analysis, barriers to compliance with the criteria were identified and subsequently addressed using targeted strategies. The project utilized the JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES) and the Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) tools.\n\n\nRESULTS\nEducation on continence strategies was delivered to nursing staff which resulted in improved compliance for all audit criteria, ranging from 5% to 100%. There were notable improvements in the nursing documentation, and assessment and management of patients with urinary and/or fecal incontinence in the post-intervention analysis.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe results demonstrate that nursing education and formalized assessment pathways in an acute setting can improve nursing compliance with the assessment and management of patients with either urinary or fecal incontinence to ensure safe, compassionate and person-centered care.","PeriodicalId":73539,"journal":{"name":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

OBJECTIVES The objectives of this implementation project were to review the nursing assessment and management of adult patients with urinary and fecal incontinence, and to develop local guidelines and ward-based continence assessment tools that can assist nursing staff in assessing and managing incontinence. INTRODUCTION Urinary or fecal incontinence in acute care hospitals is a growing issue that can lead to constipation, depression, breakdown of skin integrity, increased nursing home placement of elderly patients, increased length of hospital stay, and escalated healthcare costs. In many cases, incontinence can be treated and managed effectively; however, it is poorly understood and under-prioritized in many hospital settings. METHODS A pre-post intervention chart audit was conducted and reviewed compliance against 10 best-practice criteria for incontinence assessment and management. Following baseline data analysis, barriers to compliance with the criteria were identified and subsequently addressed using targeted strategies. The project utilized the JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES) and the Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) tools. RESULTS Education on continence strategies was delivered to nursing staff which resulted in improved compliance for all audit criteria, ranging from 5% to 100%. There were notable improvements in the nursing documentation, and assessment and management of patients with urinary and/or fecal incontinence in the post-intervention analysis. CONCLUSIONS The results demonstrate that nursing education and formalized assessment pathways in an acute setting can improve nursing compliance with the assessment and management of patients with either urinary or fecal incontinence to ensure safe, compassionate and person-centered care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三级医院成年内科和外科患者尿失禁的护理评估和管理:最佳实践实施项目。
目的本实施项目的目的是回顾成人尿便失禁患者的护理评估和管理,并制定当地指南和基于病房的失禁评估工具,以帮助护理人员评估和管理失禁。在急症护理医院,尿失禁或大便失禁是一个日益严重的问题,可导致便秘、抑郁、皮肤完整性破坏、老年患者养老院安置增加、住院时间延长和医疗费用上升。在许多情况下,尿失禁可以得到有效的治疗和管理;然而,在许多医院环境中,人们对其了解甚少且重视不足。方法进行干预前后图表审计,并根据10项尿失禁评估和管理最佳实践标准审查合规性。在基线数据分析之后,确定了遵守标准的障碍,并随后使用有针对性的策略解决了这些障碍。该项目利用了JBI临床证据系统的实际应用(PACES)和将研究转化为实践(GRiP)工具。结果对护理人员进行了尿失禁策略的培训,提高了所有审计标准的符合性,从5%到100%不等。在干预后分析中,护理记录、尿失禁和/或大便失禁患者的评估和管理有显著改善。结论在急症环境中实施护理教育和形式化的评估途径可以提高尿失禁和便失禁患者评估和管理的护理依从性,确保安全、富有同情心和以人为本的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Post-discharge interventions to enhance coping skills for survivors of stroke and their caregivers: a scoping review protocol. Approaches to implementing individual placement and support in the health and welfare sectors: a scoping review protocol. Obesity and dental caries in early childhood: a systematic review protocol. Experiences of family caregivers caring for critically ill children hospitalized in a pediatric intensive care unit: a qualitative systematic review protocol. Hernioplasty using low-cost mesh compared to surgical mesh in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1