An explanatory combinatorial dictionary of English conflict lexis: A case study of modern political discourse

IF 1.5 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Russian Journal of Linguistics Pub Date : 2022-12-22 DOI:10.22363/2687-0088-32005
O. Solopova, T. Khomutova
{"title":"An explanatory combinatorial dictionary of English conflict lexis: A case study of modern political discourse","authors":"O. Solopova, T. Khomutova","doi":"10.22363/2687-0088-32005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Though political discourse is in the mainstream of modern studies, scholars haven’t so far paid much attention to compiling political discourse-oriented dictionaries. The need to further develop lexicographic theory and practice for specific purposes and advance new methods to dictionary making is a challenge that linguists are facing today. The aim of the case study is twofold: to work out the principles for making an Explanatory Combinatorial Dictionary (ECD) of English political conflict lexis and the microstructure of an ECD entry. The source of the data is the NOW corpus; the material is current American political discourse (2022). The ECD is generally consistent with Mel'čuk’s Meaning-Text theory (MTT). The authors describe a process of collecting and processing the data: corpus search and analysis, automatic and manual text processing, glossary compilation with the use of lexicographic, semasiological, and etymological methods and present an example of an ECD entry consisting of semantic, phonological, and cooccurrence zones. The findings prove that the use of electronic text corpora offers an effective way for compiling a specialized discourse-based dictionary. The research illustrates the validity of MTT: though based on the data of “language in context” , the dictionary is synthesis-oriented: it aims at speech production. The paper is the first result of a bigger project sketching the overall framework of the discursive ECD of political conflict lexis, which subsequent studies will hopefully develop with more precision and detail. The dictionary will be helpful for scholars in linguistics, discourse analysis, media and communication, political science, and conflict studies.","PeriodicalId":53426,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Linguistics","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-32005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Though political discourse is in the mainstream of modern studies, scholars haven’t so far paid much attention to compiling political discourse-oriented dictionaries. The need to further develop lexicographic theory and practice for specific purposes and advance new methods to dictionary making is a challenge that linguists are facing today. The aim of the case study is twofold: to work out the principles for making an Explanatory Combinatorial Dictionary (ECD) of English political conflict lexis and the microstructure of an ECD entry. The source of the data is the NOW corpus; the material is current American political discourse (2022). The ECD is generally consistent with Mel'čuk’s Meaning-Text theory (MTT). The authors describe a process of collecting and processing the data: corpus search and analysis, automatic and manual text processing, glossary compilation with the use of lexicographic, semasiological, and etymological methods and present an example of an ECD entry consisting of semantic, phonological, and cooccurrence zones. The findings prove that the use of electronic text corpora offers an effective way for compiling a specialized discourse-based dictionary. The research illustrates the validity of MTT: though based on the data of “language in context” , the dictionary is synthesis-oriented: it aims at speech production. The paper is the first result of a bigger project sketching the overall framework of the discursive ECD of political conflict lexis, which subsequent studies will hopefully develop with more precision and detail. The dictionary will be helpful for scholars in linguistics, discourse analysis, media and communication, political science, and conflict studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英语冲突词汇的解释性组合词典:以现代政治话语为例
虽然政治话语是现代研究的主流,但迄今为止,学者们对政治话语词典的编纂并不重视。需要进一步发展词典编纂的理论和实践的具体目的和推进新方法的词典制作是一个挑战,语言学家面临着今天。本案例研究的目的有两个:制定英语政治冲突词汇解释性组合词典(ECD)的编写原则和ECD词条的微观结构。数据来源为NOW语料库;材料是当前的美国政治话语(2022)。ECD与Mel' uk的意义-文本理论(MTT)基本一致。作者描述了收集和处理数据的过程:语料库搜索和分析、自动和手动文本处理、使用词典学、语义学和词源学方法的词汇汇编,并提供了一个由语义、语音和共现区组成的ECD条目的示例。研究结果表明,使用电子文本语料库为编写专业语篇词典提供了一种有效的途径。该研究说明了MTT的有效性:虽然基于“语境中的语言”的数据,但词典是面向综合的:它的目的是产生语音。这篇论文是一个更大的项目的第一个成果,该项目概述了政治冲突词汇的话语ECD的总体框架,后续的研究有望更精确和详细地发展。这本词典将对语言学、话语分析、媒体与传播、政治学和冲突研究等领域的学者有所帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Russian Journal of Linguistics
Russian Journal of Linguistics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
33.30%
发文量
43
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Linguistic pluricentrism and the Russian language Picture naming test: Linguistic challenges of the method and ways to solve them Cognitive complexity measures for educational texts: Empirical validation of linguistic parameters The image of Russia through animal metaphors: A diachronic case study of American media discourse The gentle craft of saying “No” in Persian and English: A cross-cultural and cross-linguistic slant
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1