Effects of Levobupivacaine at Different Doses with Fentanyl added on Intrathecal Anaesthesia for Cesarean Section

Bedih Balkan, A. Yektaş
{"title":"Effects of Levobupivacaine at Different Doses with Fentanyl added on Intrathecal Anaesthesia for Cesarean Section","authors":"Bedih Balkan, A. Yektaş","doi":"10.21767/2386-5180.100286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The main aim of this study is to investigate the effect of levobupivacaine at different doses with fentanyl added on intrathecal anaesthesia in cesarean section. Materials and methods: This study is randomized, prospective and double-blind. Patients were divided into 3 groups (n=24 per group). Group 1: 11 mg levobupivacaine intrathecal, Group 2: 8 mg levobupivacaine+25 microgram fentanyl intrathecal and Group 3: 6 mg levobupivacaine+25 mg fentanyl intrathecal. Spinal anaesthesia start time, sensorial block time, motor block time, satisfaction of surgeon, satisfaction of patient, and analgesic consumption was recorded. The three groups were compared in terms of these values. Results: Motor block time in Group 1 was statistically longer than Group 3. Additional analgesic requirements in Group 1 were statistically less than Group 2 and 3 at the end of surgery. Conclusion: CSEA is gold standard for cesarean section. If local anesthetic dose is reduced anesthetic quality decreases, analgesic requirements increase and motor block recovery is shortened.","PeriodicalId":8195,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Research","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21767/2386-5180.100286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: The main aim of this study is to investigate the effect of levobupivacaine at different doses with fentanyl added on intrathecal anaesthesia in cesarean section. Materials and methods: This study is randomized, prospective and double-blind. Patients were divided into 3 groups (n=24 per group). Group 1: 11 mg levobupivacaine intrathecal, Group 2: 8 mg levobupivacaine+25 microgram fentanyl intrathecal and Group 3: 6 mg levobupivacaine+25 mg fentanyl intrathecal. Spinal anaesthesia start time, sensorial block time, motor block time, satisfaction of surgeon, satisfaction of patient, and analgesic consumption was recorded. The three groups were compared in terms of these values. Results: Motor block time in Group 1 was statistically longer than Group 3. Additional analgesic requirements in Group 1 were statistically less than Group 2 and 3 at the end of surgery. Conclusion: CSEA is gold standard for cesarean section. If local anesthetic dose is reduced anesthetic quality decreases, analgesic requirements increase and motor block recovery is shortened.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同剂量左布比卡因加芬太尼对剖宫产术鞘内麻醉的影响
目的:探讨不同剂量左布比卡因加芬太尼对剖宫产术鞘内麻醉的影响。材料与方法:本研究采用随机、前瞻性、双盲方法。患者分为3组,每组24例。组1:左布比卡因鞘内11 mg,组2:左布比卡因鞘内8 mg +25微克芬太尼,组3:左布比卡因鞘内6 mg +芬太尼25 mg。记录脊髓麻醉开始时间、感觉阻滞时间、运动阻滞时间、外科医生满意度、患者满意度、镇痛药用量。根据这些值对三组进行比较。结果:1组运动阻滞时间明显长于3组。在手术结束时,组1的额外镇痛需求在统计学上少于组2和组3。结论:CSEA是剖宫产手术的金标准。如果局部麻醉剂量减少,麻醉质量下降,镇痛需求增加,运动阻滞恢复时间缩短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research and Recent Advancements on Multiple Sclerosis Emerging Public Health Threats and their Health Perspectives Immunology and Multiple Sclerosis Risk with Air Pollution Seroprevalence of Cytomegalovirus among Schizophrenic Patients in Khartoum State Short Communication on Anesthesiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1