Tax Avoidance and Equity Pricing: The Importance of Countries’ Legal Institutions and Disclosure Regulations

Tax eJournal Pub Date : 2021-08-30 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3914068
Ruiyuan Chen, Sadok El Ghoul, O. Guedhami, Jeffrey A. Pittman, Yang Yang
{"title":"Tax Avoidance and Equity Pricing: The Importance of Countries’ Legal Institutions and Disclosure Regulations","authors":"Ruiyuan Chen, Sadok El Ghoul, O. Guedhami, Jeffrey A. Pittman, Yang Yang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3914068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building on Desai and Dharmapala’s (2006) complementarity theory on the relation between tax avoidance and insider diversion, we contribute to international research by examining the importance of tax avoidance to equity pricing, and the role that institutional environments play in shaping this link. Our theoretical framework generates two predictions. First, investors require higher risk premium compensation for their exposure to insiders’ diversion of corporate resources hidden by obfuscatory tax avoidance activities. Second, stronger country-level legal institutions and disclosure regulations mitigate this impact. Analyzing a sample of firms from 47 non-U.S. countries, we report strong evidence that equity financing costs rise when firms take more aggressive tax positions. Additional analysis implies that stricter investor protection institutions and disclosure regulations alleviate investors’ concerns about insider diversion, moderating the positive impact of tax avoidance on equity pricing. The results are robust to specifying alternative measures of tax avoidance and equity financing costs, as well as to addressing endogeneity. Collectively, these findings suggest that investors recognize the complementarity between insider diversion and tax avoidance in less protective environments. Our evidence has major implications for investors and policy makers.","PeriodicalId":22313,"journal":{"name":"Tax eJournal","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tax eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3914068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Building on Desai and Dharmapala’s (2006) complementarity theory on the relation between tax avoidance and insider diversion, we contribute to international research by examining the importance of tax avoidance to equity pricing, and the role that institutional environments play in shaping this link. Our theoretical framework generates two predictions. First, investors require higher risk premium compensation for their exposure to insiders’ diversion of corporate resources hidden by obfuscatory tax avoidance activities. Second, stronger country-level legal institutions and disclosure regulations mitigate this impact. Analyzing a sample of firms from 47 non-U.S. countries, we report strong evidence that equity financing costs rise when firms take more aggressive tax positions. Additional analysis implies that stricter investor protection institutions and disclosure regulations alleviate investors’ concerns about insider diversion, moderating the positive impact of tax avoidance on equity pricing. The results are robust to specifying alternative measures of tax avoidance and equity financing costs, as well as to addressing endogeneity. Collectively, these findings suggest that investors recognize the complementarity between insider diversion and tax avoidance in less protective environments. Our evidence has major implications for investors and policy makers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
避税与股权定价:国家法律制度和信息披露法规的重要性
在Desai和Dharmapala(2006)关于避税和内部人转移之间关系的互补性理论的基础上,我们通过研究避税对股票定价的重要性,以及制度环境在形成这种联系方面所起的作用,为国际研究做出了贡献。我们的理论框架产生了两个预测。首先,投资者需要更高的风险溢价补偿,因为他们暴露在内部人士转移企业资源的行为中,这些资源隐藏在模糊的避税活动中。其次,加强国家层面的法律制度和信息披露法规可以减轻这种影响。分析了47家非美国公司的样本。我们报告了强有力的证据表明,当企业采取更积极的税收政策时,股权融资成本会上升。进一步的分析表明,更严格的投资者保护制度和披露法规缓解了投资者对内幕转移的担忧,从而缓和了避税对股票定价的积极影响。结果是稳健的指定替代措施的避税和股权融资成本,以及解决内生性。总的来说,这些发现表明,投资者认识到在保护程度较低的环境中,内部人转移和避税之间存在互补性。我们的证据对投资者和政策制定者具有重大意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New Puzzles in International Tax Agreements Analysts’ GAAP earnings forecast quality Workplace Transformation and Its Tax Compliance Implications Consumption Taxes and Multinational Tax Planning in the Digital Age - Evidence from the European Service Sector Tax Avoidance and Equity Pricing: The Importance of Countries’ Legal Institutions and Disclosure Regulations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1