ANALISIS FRAUD HEXAGON TERHADAP FINANCIAL STATEMENT FRAUD PADA PERUSAHAAN SEKTOR INFRASTRUKTUR, UTILITAS DAN TRANSPORTASI

IF 2.5 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Abacus-A Journal of Accounting Finance and Business Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-28 DOI:10.47153/afs21.2702022
Herlina Nadziliyah, Niken Savitri Primasari
{"title":"ANALISIS FRAUD HEXAGON TERHADAP FINANCIAL STATEMENT FRAUD PADA PERUSAHAAN SEKTOR INFRASTRUKTUR, UTILITAS DAN TRANSPORTASI","authors":"Herlina Nadziliyah, Niken Savitri Primasari","doi":"10.47153/afs21.2702022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Financial statement fraud is a discrepancy between the application of accounting principles and the preparation of financial statements with the aim of deceiving and deceiving users of financial statements. The approach taken to identify the factors that influence financial statement fraud, one of which is the fraud hexagon model. There are six factors in the fraud hexagon, namely Stimulus which will be represented by financial targets, Ability will be represented by a change of director, Collusion will be represented by political connections, Opportunity will be represented by the quality of external auditors, Rationalization will be represented by audit opinion and Ego is represented by many photos CEO. This study aims to analyze the effect of the fraud hexagon on fraudulent financial statements in infrastructure, utility and transportation sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015-2019. Detection of the possibility of fraudulent financial statements is measured by the F-Score model. This study uses a purposive sampling technique with a sample of 25 companies and 125 data on annual reports and financial statements. The results showed that financial targets, the quality of external auditors, and the number of CEO photos had no effect on financial statement fraud, while the change of directors had a negative and significant effect on financial statement fraud, political connections had a positive and significant effect on financial statement fraud. Audit opinion has a negative and significant effect on financial statement fraud.","PeriodicalId":47285,"journal":{"name":"Abacus-A Journal of Accounting Finance and Business Studies","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abacus-A Journal of Accounting Finance and Business Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47153/afs21.2702022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Financial statement fraud is a discrepancy between the application of accounting principles and the preparation of financial statements with the aim of deceiving and deceiving users of financial statements. The approach taken to identify the factors that influence financial statement fraud, one of which is the fraud hexagon model. There are six factors in the fraud hexagon, namely Stimulus which will be represented by financial targets, Ability will be represented by a change of director, Collusion will be represented by political connections, Opportunity will be represented by the quality of external auditors, Rationalization will be represented by audit opinion and Ego is represented by many photos CEO. This study aims to analyze the effect of the fraud hexagon on fraudulent financial statements in infrastructure, utility and transportation sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015-2019. Detection of the possibility of fraudulent financial statements is measured by the F-Score model. This study uses a purposive sampling technique with a sample of 25 companies and 125 data on annual reports and financial statements. The results showed that financial targets, the quality of external auditors, and the number of CEO photos had no effect on financial statement fraud, while the change of directors had a negative and significant effect on financial statement fraud, political connections had a positive and significant effect on financial statement fraud. Audit opinion has a negative and significant effect on financial statement fraud.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HEXAGON FRAUD分析了基础设施、公用事业和运输部门的财务报表
财务报表舞弊是会计原则的应用与以欺骗为目的编制财务报表与欺骗财务报表使用者之间的差异。识别影响财务报表舞弊的因素的方法,其中之一是舞弊六边形模型。欺诈六边形中有六个因素,即刺激因素,以财务目标为代表,能力因素以更换董事为代表,勾结因素以政治关系为代表,机会因素以外部审计师的素质为代表,合理化因素以审计意见为代表,自我因素以许多CEO的照片为代表。本研究旨在分析欺诈六边形对2015-2019年在印度尼西亚证券交易所上市的基础设施、公用事业和运输部门公司欺诈性财务报表的影响。对财务报表欺诈可能性的检测是通过F-Score模型来衡量的。本研究采用有目的的抽样技术,以25家公司和125个年度报告和财务报表数据为样本。结果表明,财务目标、外部审计师的质量和CEO照片的数量对财务报表舞弊没有影响,而董事变更对财务报表舞弊有负向且显著的影响,政治关系对财务报表舞弊有正向且显著的影响。审计意见对财务报表舞弊具有显著的负向影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Since 1965 Abacus has consistently provided a vehicle for the expression of independent and critical thought on matters of current academic and professional interest in accounting, finance and business. The journal reports current research; critically evaluates current developments in theory and practice; analyses the effects of the regulatory framework of accounting, finance and business; and explores alternatives to, and explanations of, past and current practices.
期刊最新文献
Boosting Government Assets as A Revenue Center: Risk and Treatment The Effect of Organizational Climate on Sell‐side Analyst Turnover and Performance Ex‐military Top Executives and Corporate Violations: Evidence from China Corporate Governance Reforms and Analyst Forecasts: International Evidence Analysts’ Earnings per Share Forecasts: The Effects of Forecast Uncertainty and Forecast Precision on Investor Judgements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1