Generalized phenomenological model to analyze the forming limit curve of Al 1050

IF 1.4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design Pub Date : 2023-02-07 DOI:10.1177/03093247231152288
Zahra Ramezani Anbaran, F. Rahimzadeh Lotfabad, R. Ebrahimi, H. Danesh Manesh
{"title":"Generalized phenomenological model to analyze the forming limit curve of Al 1050","authors":"Zahra Ramezani Anbaran, F. Rahimzadeh Lotfabad, R. Ebrahimi, H. Danesh Manesh","doi":"10.1177/03093247231152288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this investigation, the previously proposed phenomenological model in the literature is generalized both in terms of the mathematical form of the model and the yield function used to describe the plasticity of the material. Al 1050 is chosen as the model material, where the sheets made from this material are first annealed and then subjected to a tensile test and Erichsen cupping test to obtain tensile properties as well as the FLC of the material. The constants of the generalized model are first obtained by curve fitting, whereby in this approach least overall error is expected as a single equation is used to predict the FLC of material. Further, it is shown that it would be possible to enhance the accuracy of the model at the cost of losing the applicability of a single mathematical expression for both branches of FLC. In this approach, the generalized model would be calibrated for the right branch based on Swift’s model and for the left branch based on Hill’s model. Finally, the effect of the yield criterion used to describe the plasticity of the material on the predictions of the generalized model is investigated, and it is shown that using the Hosford yield criterion yields better results compared to using the von Mises yield criterion.","PeriodicalId":50038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03093247231152288","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this investigation, the previously proposed phenomenological model in the literature is generalized both in terms of the mathematical form of the model and the yield function used to describe the plasticity of the material. Al 1050 is chosen as the model material, where the sheets made from this material are first annealed and then subjected to a tensile test and Erichsen cupping test to obtain tensile properties as well as the FLC of the material. The constants of the generalized model are first obtained by curve fitting, whereby in this approach least overall error is expected as a single equation is used to predict the FLC of material. Further, it is shown that it would be possible to enhance the accuracy of the model at the cost of losing the applicability of a single mathematical expression for both branches of FLC. In this approach, the generalized model would be calibrated for the right branch based on Swift’s model and for the left branch based on Hill’s model. Finally, the effect of the yield criterion used to describe the plasticity of the material on the predictions of the generalized model is investigated, and it is shown that using the Hosford yield criterion yields better results compared to using the von Mises yield criterion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用广义现象学模型分析al1050成形极限曲线
在本研究中,先前在文献中提出的现象学模型在模型的数学形式和用于描述材料塑性的屈服函数方面得到了推广。选择Al 1050作为模型材料,由该材料制成的板材首先进行退火,然后进行拉伸试验和Erichsen拔罐试验,以获得拉伸性能以及材料的FLC。广义模型的常数首先通过曲线拟合得到,因此在这种方法中,由于使用单一方程来预测材料的FLC,因此预计总体误差最小。此外,本文还表明,有可能以失去单一数学表达式对FLC两个分支的适用性为代价来提高模型的准确性。在这种方法中,广义模型将根据Swift的模型对右分支进行校准,根据Hill的模型对左分支进行校准。最后,研究了用于描述材料塑性的屈服准则对广义模型预测的影响,结果表明,与使用von Mises屈服准则相比,使用Hosford屈服准则获得了更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design
Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design provides a forum for work relating to the measurement and analysis of strain that is appropriate to engineering design and practice. "Since launching in 1965, The Journal of Strain Analysis has been a collegiate effort, dedicated to providing exemplary service to our authors. We welcome contributions related to analytical, experimental, and numerical techniques for the analysis and/or measurement of stress and/or strain, or studies of relevant material properties and failure modes. Our international Editorial Board contains experts in all of these fields and is keen to encourage papers on novel techniques and innovative applications." Professor Eann Patterson - University of Liverpool, UK This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Anti-plane analysis of a crack terminating at interface of the isotropic half-planes bonded to intact orthotropic layers Compressive performance of paper honeycomb core layer with double-hole in cell walls A novel multiaxial fatigue life prediction model based on the critical plane theory and machine-learning method Non-linear analysis of the flexural-torsional stability of slender tropical glulam beams Approximate methods for contact problems involving beams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1