Boys in Religious Education – a difficult relationship?! Considering perspectives of boys in a gender-balanced pedagogy of diversity

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Encounters in Theory and History of Education Pub Date : 2018-11-30 DOI:10.24908/EOE-ESE-RSE.V19I0.11921
Th. Knauth
{"title":"Boys in Religious Education – a difficult relationship?! Considering perspectives of boys in a gender-balanced pedagogy of diversity","authors":"Th. Knauth","doi":"10.24908/EOE-ESE-RSE.V19I0.11921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pedagogy of Religion has been, for a long time, pedagogy of skipped gender difference. In a wrong generalization, students were talked about sweepingly. However, Religious Education (RE) never was neutral to gender; when it pretended to be so it actually supported male dominance. Crucial for the pioneer work of feminist theology was to reveal the gender veil (Pissarek-Hudelist, 1981, p. 47-71): The silence about the significance of gender supported an unreflected acceptance of maleness as the standard. Feminist religious pedagogy tried to overcome androcentrism, the dominance of male perspectives in religious education in contents, aims, and interactions (Jakobs 1994, p. 97-106; Kohler-Spiegel, 1995, p. 204-211; Pithan, 1993, p. 421-435).   Outcomes of research in Feminist Theology and feminist approaches to Religious Education have led to a necessary emphasis on structural discrimination of girls in school education and contributed to increasing awareness of gender bias in RE-approaches. The feminist perspective was bitterly needed and still is. But while the way of looking at girls, their life situations, needs, and gender-related educational approaches could become more differentiating, the perspective on boys has remained strangely bleak, being stuck in the criticism of male dominance.","PeriodicalId":41777,"journal":{"name":"Encounters in Theory and History of Education","volume":"152 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Encounters in Theory and History of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/EOE-ESE-RSE.V19I0.11921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pedagogy of Religion has been, for a long time, pedagogy of skipped gender difference. In a wrong generalization, students were talked about sweepingly. However, Religious Education (RE) never was neutral to gender; when it pretended to be so it actually supported male dominance. Crucial for the pioneer work of feminist theology was to reveal the gender veil (Pissarek-Hudelist, 1981, p. 47-71): The silence about the significance of gender supported an unreflected acceptance of maleness as the standard. Feminist religious pedagogy tried to overcome androcentrism, the dominance of male perspectives in religious education in contents, aims, and interactions (Jakobs 1994, p. 97-106; Kohler-Spiegel, 1995, p. 204-211; Pithan, 1993, p. 421-435).   Outcomes of research in Feminist Theology and feminist approaches to Religious Education have led to a necessary emphasis on structural discrimination of girls in school education and contributed to increasing awareness of gender bias in RE-approaches. The feminist perspective was bitterly needed and still is. But while the way of looking at girls, their life situations, needs, and gender-related educational approaches could become more differentiating, the perspective on boys has remained strangely bleak, being stuck in the criticism of male dominance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宗教教育中的男孩-一个困难的关系?!在性别平衡的多元化教学中考虑男孩的观点
长期以来,宗教教育学一直是一种跳过性别差异的教育学。在一个错误的概括中,学生被笼统地谈论。然而,宗教教育(RE)从未对性别保持中立;当它假装如此时,它实际上是支持男性统治的。女权主义神学的先驱工作至关重要的是揭示性别面纱(Pissarek-Hudelist, 1981, p. 47-71):对性别重要性的沉默支持了对男性作为标准的不加思考的接受。女权主义宗教教育学试图克服男性中心主义,即男性视角在宗教教育内容、目标和互动方面的主导地位(Jakobs 1994,第97-106页;Kohler-Spiegel, 1995, p. 204-211;Pithan, 1993,第421-435页)。女性主义神学和女性主义宗教教育方法的研究结果导致了对学校教育中女孩结构性歧视的必要强调,并有助于提高对re方法中性别偏见的认识。女权主义的观点过去是非常需要的,现在也是。但是,尽管看待女孩的方式、她们的生活状况、需求和与性别相关的教育方法可能会变得更加不同,但对男孩的看法仍然奇怪地黯淡,被困在对男性统治的批评中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Encounters in Theory and History of Education
Encounters in Theory and History of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Entrevista en inglés - Meta-Education: El intento de superar un marco conceptual politizado en Filosofía de la Educación History in Our Hands. Participatory Methodologies in Curatorial Work at the National History Museum of Chile Towards the Construction of a History of the Schoolbook in Chile (1843-1879): Translation, Appropriation, Adaptation, Imitation, and Self-Production Dictature militaire, réforme universitaire et formation des enseignants au Chili : l'émergence historique d'une structure dysfonctionnelle Decolonizing Higher Education: Historical Myths, Official Discourses, and University Reforms in Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1