U.S.-China-Russia Tripolarity and Energy Security in the Indo-Pacific: Focusing on Natural Gas and Nuclear Power

Eunjung Lim
{"title":"U.S.-China-Russia Tripolarity and Energy Security in the Indo-Pacific: Focusing on Natural Gas and Nuclear Power","authors":"Eunjung Lim","doi":"10.29274/ews.2023.35.1.59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study comparatively analyzes the capabilities and national interests of the US, China, and Russia in the field of natural gas and nuclear power using Randall Schweller’s tripolarity as the analytical framework. Through this comparative analysis, this study aims to infer how the structure of the US-China-Russia tripolarity will affect energy security in the Indo-Pacific region. Based on the results of a comparative analysis of the capabilities and national interests of the three superpowers in the natural gas and nuclear power fields, this paper argues that the structure of the US-China-Russia tripolarity can further accelerate power restructuring in the Indo-Pacific region through energy. It is predicted that in both the natural gas and nuclear power fields, where none of the three superpowers has an overwhelming advantage, there is room for energy security issues to be used as a means to accelerate power restructuring, as the wills to revise the status quo are colliding. This is also a warning that the energy issues may eventually escalate into a factor that could shake peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region.","PeriodicalId":84986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of East and West studies","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of East and West studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29274/ews.2023.35.1.59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study comparatively analyzes the capabilities and national interests of the US, China, and Russia in the field of natural gas and nuclear power using Randall Schweller’s tripolarity as the analytical framework. Through this comparative analysis, this study aims to infer how the structure of the US-China-Russia tripolarity will affect energy security in the Indo-Pacific region. Based on the results of a comparative analysis of the capabilities and national interests of the three superpowers in the natural gas and nuclear power fields, this paper argues that the structure of the US-China-Russia tripolarity can further accelerate power restructuring in the Indo-Pacific region through energy. It is predicted that in both the natural gas and nuclear power fields, where none of the three superpowers has an overwhelming advantage, there is room for energy security issues to be used as a means to accelerate power restructuring, as the wills to revise the status quo are colliding. This is also a warning that the energy issues may eventually escalate into a factor that could shake peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印太地区的美、中、俄三极和能源安全:聚焦天然气和核能
本研究以Randall Schweller的三极性理论为分析框架,对比分析了美国、中国和俄罗斯在天然气和核电领域的能力和国家利益。通过这一对比分析,本研究旨在推断美、中、俄三极格局将如何影响印太地区的能源安全。本文通过对三个超级大国在天然气和核电领域的能力和国家利益的对比分析,认为美中俄三极格局可以通过能源进一步加速印太地区的权力重组。有分析认为,在3个大国都没有绝对优势的天然气和核电领域,随着改变现状的意志发生冲突,能源安全问题有可能成为加快电力结构调整的手段。这也是在警告,能源问题最终可能升级为动摇印太地区和平与稳定的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study of Regional Security Institution in East Asia: U.S. Indo-Pacific Strategy and the Change of the San Francisco System Importance of Having Allies with Reconnaissance Satellites Capabilities for Successful Extended Deterrence What Should Korean Military Do to Respond to China’s Gray Zone Strategy?: Focusing on Response to Asymmetric Approach at Sea The United States and China Falling into the Thucydides’s Trap?: Learning from Defensive Realism 푸틴의 성과와 고난의 1990년대 재조명
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1