The United States and China Falling into the Thucydides’s Trap?: Learning from Defensive Realism

Jihwan Hwang
{"title":"The United States and China Falling into the Thucydides’s Trap?: Learning from Defensive Realism","authors":"Jihwan Hwang","doi":"10.29274/ews.2023.35.2.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article evaluates the possibility of ‘Thucydides’s Trap’ between the U.S. and China through defensive realism. The possibility of U.S.-China conflict has been mainly discussed in the frame of offensive realism. It argues that if China’s rise continues, it will cause serious military conflict between the two. However, it is unclear whether the crisis will turn into an actual conflict. Defensive realism provides an alternative perspective. However, the interpretation by defensive realism in contrast to offensive realism has not been highlighted. Considering the importance of defensive realism, there is a theoretical gap for the most important global issue. Most realist explanations predict U.S.-China relations as serious conflicts, but defensive realism posits that it does not necessarily have to be pessimistic. This article draws the concepts of a state’s motivation and type, status quo, security dilemma, and grand bargain, reinterprets U.S.-China relations, and presents alternative policies.","PeriodicalId":84986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of East and West studies","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of East and West studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29274/ews.2023.35.2.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article evaluates the possibility of ‘Thucydides’s Trap’ between the U.S. and China through defensive realism. The possibility of U.S.-China conflict has been mainly discussed in the frame of offensive realism. It argues that if China’s rise continues, it will cause serious military conflict between the two. However, it is unclear whether the crisis will turn into an actual conflict. Defensive realism provides an alternative perspective. However, the interpretation by defensive realism in contrast to offensive realism has not been highlighted. Considering the importance of defensive realism, there is a theoretical gap for the most important global issue. Most realist explanations predict U.S.-China relations as serious conflicts, but defensive realism posits that it does not necessarily have to be pessimistic. This article draws the concepts of a state’s motivation and type, status quo, security dilemma, and grand bargain, reinterprets U.S.-China relations, and presents alternative policies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中美陷入修昔底德陷阱?:从防御现实主义中学习
本文从防御现实主义的角度分析了中美之间发生“修昔底德陷阱”的可能性。中美冲突的可能性主要是在进攻性现实主义框架下讨论的。它认为,如果中国继续崛起,将导致两国之间发生严重的军事冲突。然而,目前还不清楚这场危机是否会演变成一场真正的冲突。防御性现实主义提供了另一种视角。然而,防御性现实主义与进攻性现实主义的对比解释却没有得到重视。考虑到防御性现实主义的重要性,在最重要的全球性问题上存在理论缺口。大多数现实主义的解释都预测美中关系会发生严重冲突,但防御性现实主义认为这并不一定是悲观的。本文从国家的动机和类型、现状、安全困境和大交易等概念出发,重新解读了中美关系,并提出了可供选择的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study of Regional Security Institution in East Asia: U.S. Indo-Pacific Strategy and the Change of the San Francisco System Importance of Having Allies with Reconnaissance Satellites Capabilities for Successful Extended Deterrence What Should Korean Military Do to Respond to China’s Gray Zone Strategy?: Focusing on Response to Asymmetric Approach at Sea The United States and China Falling into the Thucydides’s Trap?: Learning from Defensive Realism 푸틴의 성과와 고난의 1990년대 재조명
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1