An Overview of Wellhead Burning: Fundamental Science to Burn Performance Prediction

S. Tuttle, B. T. Fisher, D. A. Kessler, Christopher J. Pfützner, A. Skiba, R. Jacob
{"title":"An Overview of Wellhead Burning: Fundamental Science to Burn Performance Prediction","authors":"S. Tuttle, B. T. Fisher, D. A. Kessler, Christopher J. Pfützner, A. Skiba, R. Jacob","doi":"10.7901/2169-3358-2021.1.ps7-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n While wellhead burning has been an oil field hazard for generations, the development of capping response technologies and practices by industry experts has enabled the oil exploration community to shift its views of wellhead burning from a hazard to an oil spill response tool. This review covers some of the fundamental scientific aspects and technical issues of wellhead burning that engineers and policy makers will need to consider as this mitigation strategy is examined as a standard oil spill response tactic. For context, we examine a potential wellhead blowout scenario over a range of oil flows and examine the regimes of two-phase pipe flows, their dependence on wellbore velocities and gas-liquid ratios, and how those regimes will influence the burn efficiency with some insight from our experimental observations from two-phase spray burn testing. Among the critical findings that we present is that the worst-case discharge flow rate cannot be assumed to be the worst-case wellhead burning scenario.","PeriodicalId":14447,"journal":{"name":"International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7901/2169-3358-2021.1.ps7-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While wellhead burning has been an oil field hazard for generations, the development of capping response technologies and practices by industry experts has enabled the oil exploration community to shift its views of wellhead burning from a hazard to an oil spill response tool. This review covers some of the fundamental scientific aspects and technical issues of wellhead burning that engineers and policy makers will need to consider as this mitigation strategy is examined as a standard oil spill response tactic. For context, we examine a potential wellhead blowout scenario over a range of oil flows and examine the regimes of two-phase pipe flows, their dependence on wellbore velocities and gas-liquid ratios, and how those regimes will influence the burn efficiency with some insight from our experimental observations from two-phase spray burn testing. Among the critical findings that we present is that the worst-case discharge flow rate cannot be assumed to be the worst-case wellhead burning scenario.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
井口燃烧概述:燃烧性能预测的基础科学
虽然井口燃烧一直是油田的一大危害,但封顶技术的发展和行业专家的实践使石油勘探界将井口燃烧的观点从一种危害转变为一种溢油应对工具。这篇综述涵盖了井口燃烧的一些基本科学方面和技术问题,工程师和政策制定者将需要考虑这些问题,因为这种缓解策略被视为一种标准的溢油应对策略。作为背景,我们研究了一系列油流的潜在井口爆裂情况,并研究了两相管道流动的状态,它们对井筒速度和气液比的依赖,以及这些状态如何影响燃烧效率,并从两相喷雾燃烧测试的实验观察中获得了一些见解。我们提出的关键发现之一是,不能假设最坏情况下的排放流量是最坏情况下的井口燃烧情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From the deep ocean to the coasts and estuaries through the shelf: linking coastal response to a deep blow-out Case Study of a SCAT Survey and Successful Remediation Strategy by Mechanical Mixing of a Fuel Oil Spill into a Mountain Stream Using Oil Spill Modeling in Oil Spill Exercises and Drills In Situ Burn Testing of Weathered and Emulsified Crude Oils Historical Dispersant Use in U.S. Waters 1968–2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1