Persistence, Clinical and Economic Impact of Infliximab CT-P13 in Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthropathy and Ankylosing Spondylitis Naïve and Switched Patients: After 5 Years of Follow-Up
J. Borrás-Blasco, Alejandro Valcuende-Rosique, D. Rosique-Robles, E. Casterá
{"title":"Persistence, Clinical and Economic Impact of Infliximab CT-P13 in Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthropathy and Ankylosing Spondylitis Naïve and Switched Patients: After 5 Years of Follow-Up","authors":"J. Borrás-Blasco, Alejandro Valcuende-Rosique, D. Rosique-Robles, E. Casterá","doi":"10.29169/1927-5951.2022.12.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Study the economic impact and persistence of Inflectra® in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthropathy (PSA), psoriasis, ankylosing spondylitis (AS) naïve, and Remicade® switched patients. \nMethods: Retrospective observational cohort study of patients treated with Inflectra® for more than six months in a five years analysis. We collected age, sex, indication, dose, and persistence (in years) for Inflectra® naïve and Remicade® switched patients. Efficacy endpoints included a disease activity score calculator for rheumatoid arthritis (DAS28) and bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI). Safety was also assessed. We determined each patient's actual cost of Inflectra® treatment from individualized IV administration and correlated dates during the study period. We simulated the actual cost of these patients if the patients received Remicade®. \nResults: During five years, 62 patients (38 women; 31 AS, 18 RA, 13 PSA were treated with Inflectra®. 33 (53%) patients were naïve patients, and 29 (47%) were Remicade® switched patients. In Sept 2019, 33 patients continued on Inflectra® treatment (11 naïve; 22 Remicade® switched) in clinical remission. Twenty-nine patients discontinued therapy, 24 due to relapse, and five due to adverse reactions. All patients with Inflectra® presented a persistence of 24.4±7.4 months. The persistence in naïve patients was 19.1±4.4 months and in Remicade® switched patients was 29.7±5.8 months. The total associated costs of the Inflectra® treatment throughout the observation period were 901.840€. If these patients had been treated with Remicade®, the total cost of therapy would have been 1.099.803€. The use of Inflectra® saved 197,964€ during five years. \nConclusions: Inflectra® produces similar persistence and substantial cost savings when used in Infliximab naïve patients and Remicade® switched patients.","PeriodicalId":16959,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy and Nutrition Sciences","volume":"146 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy and Nutrition Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29169/1927-5951.2022.12.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Study the economic impact and persistence of Inflectra® in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthropathy (PSA), psoriasis, ankylosing spondylitis (AS) naïve, and Remicade® switched patients.
Methods: Retrospective observational cohort study of patients treated with Inflectra® for more than six months in a five years analysis. We collected age, sex, indication, dose, and persistence (in years) for Inflectra® naïve and Remicade® switched patients. Efficacy endpoints included a disease activity score calculator for rheumatoid arthritis (DAS28) and bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI). Safety was also assessed. We determined each patient's actual cost of Inflectra® treatment from individualized IV administration and correlated dates during the study period. We simulated the actual cost of these patients if the patients received Remicade®.
Results: During five years, 62 patients (38 women; 31 AS, 18 RA, 13 PSA were treated with Inflectra®. 33 (53%) patients were naïve patients, and 29 (47%) were Remicade® switched patients. In Sept 2019, 33 patients continued on Inflectra® treatment (11 naïve; 22 Remicade® switched) in clinical remission. Twenty-nine patients discontinued therapy, 24 due to relapse, and five due to adverse reactions. All patients with Inflectra® presented a persistence of 24.4±7.4 months. The persistence in naïve patients was 19.1±4.4 months and in Remicade® switched patients was 29.7±5.8 months. The total associated costs of the Inflectra® treatment throughout the observation period were 901.840€. If these patients had been treated with Remicade®, the total cost of therapy would have been 1.099.803€. The use of Inflectra® saved 197,964€ during five years.
Conclusions: Inflectra® produces similar persistence and substantial cost savings when used in Infliximab naïve patients and Remicade® switched patients.