The Invention of the Social?

Q2 Arts and Humanities Annales Pub Date : 2023-07-20 DOI:10.1017/ahsse.2022.25
B. Gray
{"title":"The Invention of the Social?","authors":"B. Gray","doi":"10.1017/ahsse.2022.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper applies to ancient Greece an approach\n developed by Pierre Rosanvallon: the integration of philosophical\n texts with the most everyday documents to better grasp a society’s\n understanding of its political life. For the ancient polis, this means\n focusing on the more prosaic evidence offered by cities’ inscriptions,\n especially their collective decisions published on stone. It is used\n here to consider the changing ideas about the nature of political and\n private life—and especially the space between them. In a very\n influential model, Classical Athenian democrats and philosophers\n tended to insist on a sharp binary distinction between public/\n political life and private life, leaving little room for a notion of\n an intermediate third space of polis life, similar to a “social\n sphere” or “civil society.” This pattern remained dominant in the\n Hellenistic and Roman periods, but, especially after c. 150 BC, some\n Greek citizens and intellectuals developed, above all in inscriptions,\n a much more explicit, complex, and subtle notion of “social life” as\n something between politics and private life. The article concludes by\n asking what the different ancient concepts discussed can contribute to\n current historiographical debates about the nature of the Greek city\n after c. 150 BC, especially when it comes to moving beyond the\n traditional picture of “depoliticization.” It also calls into question\n the orthodox narrative of the development of ideas of “the social”\n over many centuries up to the present.","PeriodicalId":35258,"journal":{"name":"Annales","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ahsse.2022.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper applies to ancient Greece an approach developed by Pierre Rosanvallon: the integration of philosophical texts with the most everyday documents to better grasp a society’s understanding of its political life. For the ancient polis, this means focusing on the more prosaic evidence offered by cities’ inscriptions, especially their collective decisions published on stone. It is used here to consider the changing ideas about the nature of political and private life—and especially the space between them. In a very influential model, Classical Athenian democrats and philosophers tended to insist on a sharp binary distinction between public/ political life and private life, leaving little room for a notion of an intermediate third space of polis life, similar to a “social sphere” or “civil society.” This pattern remained dominant in the Hellenistic and Roman periods, but, especially after c. 150 BC, some Greek citizens and intellectuals developed, above all in inscriptions, a much more explicit, complex, and subtle notion of “social life” as something between politics and private life. The article concludes by asking what the different ancient concepts discussed can contribute to current historiographical debates about the nature of the Greek city after c. 150 BC, especially when it comes to moving beyond the traditional picture of “depoliticization.” It also calls into question the orthodox narrative of the development of ideas of “the social” over many centuries up to the present.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会的发明?
本文采用皮埃尔·罗桑瓦隆(Pierre Rosanvallon)提出的一种研究古希腊的方法:将哲学文本与最日常的文献结合起来,以更好地掌握一个社会对其政治生活的理解。对于古代城邦来说,这意味着关注城市铭文提供的更为平淡无奇的证据,尤其是他们在石头上发表的集体决定。在这里,它被用来考虑关于政治和私人生活的本质的观念的变化,尤其是它们之间的空间。在一个非常有影响力的模型中,古典雅典民主主义者和哲学家倾向于坚持公共/政治生活和私人生活之间的尖锐二元区分,几乎没有给城邦生活的中间第三空间的概念留下空间,类似于“社会领域”或“公民社会”。这种模式在希腊化和罗马时期仍然占主导地位,但是,特别是在公元前150年之后,一些希腊公民和知识分子发展了一种更明确、更复杂、更微妙的概念,即“社会生活”是介于政治和私人生活之间的东西,尤其是在铭文中。文章最后提出,这些不同的古代概念对当前关于公元前150年后希腊城市性质的史学争论有何贡献,尤其是在超越传统的“去政治化”观点的时候。它还对几个世纪以来“社会”观念发展的正统叙述提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annales
Annales Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: Fondée en 1929 par March Bloch et Lucien Febvre, les Annales illustrent, au-delà de ce prestigieux héritage, la recherche historique dans ce qu’elle a de plus innovant. Nouveaux domaines de la recherche et histoire comparée, ouverture sur les aires culturelles et réflexion épistémologique, signatures prestigieuses et jeunes historiens définissent l’esprit des Annales, revue d’histoire par excellence, dont le rayonnement est international. Au-delà de la discipline historique, les Annales jouent un rôle important dans le champ des sciences sociales et sont le lieu privilégié d"un dialogue raisonné entre les différentes sciences de l"homme.
期刊最新文献
In a Garden of Forking Maps Martyrdom, Witnessing, and Social Lineages in the Tamil Country The Trial of Faith in the Spanish Inquisition The Invention of the Social? Commons and Dynamics of Power in Medieval Southern Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1