Commons and Dynamics of Power in Medieval Southern Europe

Q2 Arts and Humanities Annales Pub Date : 2023-07-20 DOI:10.1017/ahsse.2022.24
Martín Iñaki Viso, Riccardo Rao
{"title":"Commons and Dynamics of Power in Medieval Southern Europe","authors":"Martín Iñaki Viso, Riccardo Rao","doi":"10.1017/ahsse.2022.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article presents a comparative analysis of\n the commons in two broad regions of medieval southern Europe: northern\n Italy and the Iberian Peninsula’s Duero Plateau. Recent scholarship on\n different regions of northern Europe has highlighted the centrality of\n common lands to both agrosystems and the organization of communities,\n drawing on the economic theories of Elinor Ostrom and generally\n focusing on the early modern period. It has also suggested a contrast\n between resilient communities in northern Europe, where the presence\n of stable commons helped absorb social inequality, and those of\n southern Europe, where less solid commons supposedly resulted in lower\n cohesion among communities. Our longue-durée comparative study of these two\n regions shows, however, that commons existed in southern Europe from\n the early medieval period on. It also reveals how they evolved and\n adapted throughout the High and late Middle Ages, in tandem with the\n documentary practices that recorded them. This resilience took\n different forms in each of the areas studied, reflecting the influence\n of a range of different factors across southern Europe. The commons\n endured because they were part of a “moral economy” of collective use,\n which, in constant dialogue with notions of property and ownership,\n helped forge lasting identities in both rural and urban contexts and\n on different scales.","PeriodicalId":35258,"journal":{"name":"Annales","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ahsse.2022.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of the commons in two broad regions of medieval southern Europe: northern Italy and the Iberian Peninsula’s Duero Plateau. Recent scholarship on different regions of northern Europe has highlighted the centrality of common lands to both agrosystems and the organization of communities, drawing on the economic theories of Elinor Ostrom and generally focusing on the early modern period. It has also suggested a contrast between resilient communities in northern Europe, where the presence of stable commons helped absorb social inequality, and those of southern Europe, where less solid commons supposedly resulted in lower cohesion among communities. Our longue-durée comparative study of these two regions shows, however, that commons existed in southern Europe from the early medieval period on. It also reveals how they evolved and adapted throughout the High and late Middle Ages, in tandem with the documentary practices that recorded them. This resilience took different forms in each of the areas studied, reflecting the influence of a range of different factors across southern Europe. The commons endured because they were part of a “moral economy” of collective use, which, in constant dialogue with notions of property and ownership, helped forge lasting identities in both rural and urban contexts and on different scales.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中世纪南欧的公地与权力动态
本文对中世纪南欧两大地区的公地进行了比较分析:意大利北部和伊比利亚半岛的杜埃罗高原。最近关于北欧不同地区的学术研究强调了公共土地在农业系统和社区组织中的中心地位,借鉴了埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆(Elinor Ostrom)的经济理论,总体上关注于近代早期。它还提出了北欧弹性社区与南欧社区之间的对比,在北欧,稳定的公地有助于吸收社会不平等,而在南欧,不那么稳固的公地可能导致社区之间的凝聚力降低。然而,我们对这两个地区的长期比较研究表明,从中世纪早期开始,公地就存在于南欧。它还揭示了它们在整个中世纪和中世纪晚期是如何进化和适应的,以及记录它们的文献实践。这种韧性在研究的每个地区都有不同的形式,反映了南欧一系列不同因素的影响。公地之所以存在,是因为它们是集体使用的“道德经济”的一部分,这种经济与财产和所有权的概念不断对话,有助于在农村和城市背景下以及不同规模上形成持久的身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annales
Annales Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: Fondée en 1929 par March Bloch et Lucien Febvre, les Annales illustrent, au-delà de ce prestigieux héritage, la recherche historique dans ce qu’elle a de plus innovant. Nouveaux domaines de la recherche et histoire comparée, ouverture sur les aires culturelles et réflexion épistémologique, signatures prestigieuses et jeunes historiens définissent l’esprit des Annales, revue d’histoire par excellence, dont le rayonnement est international. Au-delà de la discipline historique, les Annales jouent un rôle important dans le champ des sciences sociales et sont le lieu privilégié d"un dialogue raisonné entre les différentes sciences de l"homme.
期刊最新文献
In a Garden of Forking Maps Martyrdom, Witnessing, and Social Lineages in the Tamil Country The Trial of Faith in the Spanish Inquisition The Invention of the Social? Commons and Dynamics of Power in Medieval Southern Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1