Gene Editing in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells: Choosing the Correct Path

Amar M. Singh, Valeriya V Adjan Steffey, Tseten Yeshi, D. Allison
{"title":"Gene Editing in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells: Choosing the Correct Path","authors":"Amar M. Singh, Valeriya V Adjan Steffey, Tseten Yeshi, D. Allison","doi":"10.15436/2471-0598.15.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent emergence of targeted nucleases has opened up new opportunities for performing genetic modifications with human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs). These modifications can range from the creation of a routine knock-out to the more challenging single point-mutation. For both the new and established user, deciding on the best approach for the specific modification of interest can be an arduous task, as new and improved technologies are rapidly and continuously being developed. The choices between the reagents and methodologies depends entirely on the end-goal of the experiments and the locus to be modified. Investigators need to decide on the best nuclease to use for each experiment from among Zinc-Finger Nucleases (ZFNs), Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases (TALENs) and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 that would result in the highest likelihood of success with the fewest pitfalls. Furthermore, there have been significant improvements over the first-generation nucleases, such as the development of the dimeric CRISPR RNA-guided Fok1 nucleases (RFNs, marketed as NextGEN™ CRISPR) that reduces the “off-target” mutation rate, providing further options for investigators. Should researchers need to perform a point mutation, then considerations must be made between using single-stranded oligo-deoxynucleotides (ssODN) as the donor for homology-directed repair or utilizing a selection cassette within a donor vector in combination with an excision-only piggyBac™ transposase to leave a seamless edit. In this review, we will provide a general overview of the current technologies, along with methodologies for generating point mutations, while considering both their pros and cons.","PeriodicalId":91343,"journal":{"name":"Journal of stem cell and regenerative biology","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of stem cell and regenerative biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15436/2471-0598.15.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The recent emergence of targeted nucleases has opened up new opportunities for performing genetic modifications with human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs). These modifications can range from the creation of a routine knock-out to the more challenging single point-mutation. For both the new and established user, deciding on the best approach for the specific modification of interest can be an arduous task, as new and improved technologies are rapidly and continuously being developed. The choices between the reagents and methodologies depends entirely on the end-goal of the experiments and the locus to be modified. Investigators need to decide on the best nuclease to use for each experiment from among Zinc-Finger Nucleases (ZFNs), Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases (TALENs) and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 that would result in the highest likelihood of success with the fewest pitfalls. Furthermore, there have been significant improvements over the first-generation nucleases, such as the development of the dimeric CRISPR RNA-guided Fok1 nucleases (RFNs, marketed as NextGEN™ CRISPR) that reduces the “off-target” mutation rate, providing further options for investigators. Should researchers need to perform a point mutation, then considerations must be made between using single-stranded oligo-deoxynucleotides (ssODN) as the donor for homology-directed repair or utilizing a selection cassette within a donor vector in combination with an excision-only piggyBac™ transposase to leave a seamless edit. In this review, we will provide a general overview of the current technologies, along with methodologies for generating point mutations, while considering both their pros and cons.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类多能干细胞的基因编辑:选择正确的路径
最近出现的靶向核酸酶为人类多能干细胞(hPSCs)的遗传修饰开辟了新的机会。这些修改的范围可以从常规的敲除到更具挑战性的单点突变。对于新用户和老用户来说,决定具体修改兴趣的最佳方法可能是一项艰巨的任务,因为新的和改进的技术正在迅速和不断地发展。试剂和方法之间的选择完全取决于实验的最终目标和要修改的位点。研究人员需要从锌指核酸酶(ZFNs)、转录激活因子样效应核酸酶(TALENs)和聚集规律间隔短回语重复序列(CRISPR)/Cas9中选择最佳的核酸酶用于每个实验,这将导致成功的可能性最高,陷阱最少。此外,与第一代核酸酶相比,已经有了重大改进,例如二聚体CRISPR rna引导的Fok1核酸酶(RFNs,以NextGEN™CRISPR销售)的开发降低了“脱靶”突变率,为研究人员提供了进一步的选择。如果研究人员需要进行点突变,那么必须考虑使用单链寡核苷酸(ssODN)作为同源定向修复的供体,或在供体载体中使用选择盒与仅切除的piggyBac™转座酶相结合,以留下无缝编辑。在这篇综述中,我们将提供当前技术的总体概述,以及生成点突变的方法,同时考虑它们的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reconstruction of Lower Jaw by Iliac Bone Graft, Experimental Study on Rabbit and Role of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Immunomodulation by Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Their Clinical Applications. Neurons Self-Organize Around Salivary Epithelial Cells in Novel Co-Culture Model Mice lacking MKP-1 and MKP-5 Reveal Hierarchical Regulation of Regenerative Myogenesis. Gene Editing in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells: Choosing the Correct Path
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1