The Relationship Between Dialectical Thinking and Emotion Understanding in Senior Preschool Children

IF 0.6 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Kulturno-Istoricheskaya Psikhologiya-Cultural-Historical Psychology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17759/chp.2022180104
N. Veraksa, Z. Airapetyan, M. Gavrilova, K. S. Tarasova
{"title":"The Relationship Between Dialectical Thinking and Emotion Understanding in Senior Preschool Children","authors":"N. Veraksa, Z. Airapetyan, M. Gavrilova, K. S. Tarasova","doi":"10.17759/chp.2022180104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to clarify the methodological status of the category “activity Theoretical foundations of the relationship between child’s cognitive and emotional development were formulated in the works of Russian and international authors. We consider a child's dialectical thinking genesis as one of the cognitive development lines. This research aimed to study the relationship between dialectical thinking and emotion understanding in older preschool children. It was assumed that there is a significant relationship between emotion understanding and the success of children in completing three particular dialectical tasks, such as overcoming contradictions, understanding the simplest developmental processes and making a creative product. This study included 148 children, aged 5—6. We evaluated the level of non-verbal intelligence, dialectical thinking and emotion understanding using the following techniques: “Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices”, “Drawing an unusual tree”, “Cycles”, “What can be both at the same time?” and the Russian version of the “Test of Emotion Comprehension”. Correlational analysis of the resulting data revealed significant relationships between non-verbal intelligence, indicators of dialectical thinking and the overall level of emotion understanding. When controlling non-verbal intelligence, linear hierarchical regression analysis was used to demonstrate a significant contribution of dialectical thinking to the dispersion of values according to the general level of emotion understanding. The research results are of practical importance and make it possible to use transforming (understanding the simplest developmental processes and making a creative product) and overcoming contradictions as developmental tasks when working with children aged 5—6.","PeriodicalId":44568,"journal":{"name":"Kulturno-Istoricheskaya Psikhologiya-Cultural-Historical Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kulturno-Istoricheskaya Psikhologiya-Cultural-Historical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2022180104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to clarify the methodological status of the category “activity Theoretical foundations of the relationship between child’s cognitive and emotional development were formulated in the works of Russian and international authors. We consider a child's dialectical thinking genesis as one of the cognitive development lines. This research aimed to study the relationship between dialectical thinking and emotion understanding in older preschool children. It was assumed that there is a significant relationship between emotion understanding and the success of children in completing three particular dialectical tasks, such as overcoming contradictions, understanding the simplest developmental processes and making a creative product. This study included 148 children, aged 5—6. We evaluated the level of non-verbal intelligence, dialectical thinking and emotion understanding using the following techniques: “Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices”, “Drawing an unusual tree”, “Cycles”, “What can be both at the same time?” and the Russian version of the “Test of Emotion Comprehension”. Correlational analysis of the resulting data revealed significant relationships between non-verbal intelligence, indicators of dialectical thinking and the overall level of emotion understanding. When controlling non-verbal intelligence, linear hierarchical regression analysis was used to demonstrate a significant contribution of dialectical thinking to the dispersion of values according to the general level of emotion understanding. The research results are of practical importance and make it possible to use transforming (understanding the simplest developmental processes and making a creative product) and overcoming contradictions as developmental tasks when working with children aged 5—6.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学龄前儿童辩证思维与情绪理解的关系
本研究旨在阐明“活动”这一范畴的方法论地位。俄罗斯和国际作者的著作为儿童认知与情感发展关系的理论基础奠定了基础。我们认为儿童辩证思维的发生是认知发展的一条主线。本研究旨在探讨大龄学龄前儿童辩证思维与情绪理解的关系。人们认为,情感理解与儿童成功完成克服矛盾、理解最简单的发展过程和制作创造性产品这三个特定的辩证任务之间存在着显著的关系。这项研究包括148名5-6岁的儿童。我们使用以下技术来评估非语言智力、辩证思维和情感理解的水平:“瑞文彩色递进矩阵”、“画一棵不寻常的树”、“循环”、“什么可以同时发生?”以及俄文版的“情绪理解测试”。结果数据的相关分析揭示了非语言智力、辩证思维指标和情感理解总体水平之间的显著关系。当控制非语言智力时,采用线性层次回归分析,根据情感理解的一般水平,证明辩证思维对价值观的分散有显著贡献。研究结果具有一定的现实意义,可以将转化(理解最简单的发展过程并制作创意产品)和克服矛盾作为5-6岁儿童的发展任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Actor Training: Competencies or Aptitude Russian Version of the Sources of Spirituality Scale On the Problem of the Semantic Structure of Consciousness Development of Social and Psychological Readiness for Professional and Working Life in Students with Intellectual Disabilities Development of Formal-logical and Dialectical Thinking in Children of 5-8 Years Old
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1