Comparing Oilwell Cement Static Gel Strength Development by Ultrasonic, Intermittent and Continuous Rotation Measurement Methods

S. Ashraf, Rahmad Haidzar Muhamad Husin, Awang Rizalman, M. Bogaerts
{"title":"Comparing Oilwell Cement Static Gel Strength Development by Ultrasonic, Intermittent and Continuous Rotation Measurement Methods","authors":"S. Ashraf, Rahmad Haidzar Muhamad Husin, Awang Rizalman, M. Bogaerts","doi":"10.4043/31348-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Cement sheath integrity to prevent interzonal communication is closely related to the static gel strength. The API Standard 65-2 puts importance on the critical gel strength period (CGSP) measurement, which begins when the critical static gel strength (CSGS) is developed and ends when 500 lbf/100 ft2 is attained. The recommended duration for this period should be 45 min or less to be effective in isolating flow potentials. The API 10B-6 covers the three methods to measure the static gel strength development accepted in the industry, which are continuous and intermittent rotation followed by ultrasonic. A laboratory-based study is presented in this paper that compares these measurement methods.\n The slurry frameworks chosen for the comparison ranged between 11.5 to 18 lbm/gal and the temperature extended from 27 to 121°C. The formulation of the fluid system consisted of Class G cement, silica flour, weighting agent, or light weight extender for the blended phase. Liquid phase additives such as antifoam, fluid loss, dispersant, and retarder were used. The formulations were adjusted to simulate two placement times, i.e., one between 3 to 4 hr. and the second between 7 to 8 hr.\n The testing performed on the selected cement systems provided significant knowledge of the four different types of static gel strength development equipment used during the testing. There are two equipment's from different manufacturers operating using the continuous rotation method followed by one each for the intermittent rotation and the acoustic type.\n The overall average transit time for each slurry and the respective standard deviation were arranged for ease of comparison. It was found that there are less deviations in certain fluid systems compared with some other systems. As indicated by the API 10B-6, each equipment may well result in generating different static gel profiles due to cement sample size, apparatus configuration, and formulation. Slurry formulations can be modified to improve their transition time depending on conditions as needed.","PeriodicalId":11081,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, March 23, 2022","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, March 23, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/31348-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cement sheath integrity to prevent interzonal communication is closely related to the static gel strength. The API Standard 65-2 puts importance on the critical gel strength period (CGSP) measurement, which begins when the critical static gel strength (CSGS) is developed and ends when 500 lbf/100 ft2 is attained. The recommended duration for this period should be 45 min or less to be effective in isolating flow potentials. The API 10B-6 covers the three methods to measure the static gel strength development accepted in the industry, which are continuous and intermittent rotation followed by ultrasonic. A laboratory-based study is presented in this paper that compares these measurement methods. The slurry frameworks chosen for the comparison ranged between 11.5 to 18 lbm/gal and the temperature extended from 27 to 121°C. The formulation of the fluid system consisted of Class G cement, silica flour, weighting agent, or light weight extender for the blended phase. Liquid phase additives such as antifoam, fluid loss, dispersant, and retarder were used. The formulations were adjusted to simulate two placement times, i.e., one between 3 to 4 hr. and the second between 7 to 8 hr. The testing performed on the selected cement systems provided significant knowledge of the four different types of static gel strength development equipment used during the testing. There are two equipment's from different manufacturers operating using the continuous rotation method followed by one each for the intermittent rotation and the acoustic type. The overall average transit time for each slurry and the respective standard deviation were arranged for ease of comparison. It was found that there are less deviations in certain fluid systems compared with some other systems. As indicated by the API 10B-6, each equipment may well result in generating different static gel profiles due to cement sample size, apparatus configuration, and formulation. Slurry formulations can be modified to improve their transition time depending on conditions as needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声、间歇和连续旋转测量油井水泥静凝胶强度发展的比较
防止层间连通性的水泥环完整性与静凝胶强度密切相关。API标准65-2重视临界凝胶强度周期(CGSP)测量,该测量从临界静态凝胶强度(CSGS)开始,到达到500 lbf/100 ft2时结束。这段时间的建议持续时间应为45分钟或更短,以有效隔离流电位。API 10B-6涵盖了行业公认的三种测量静态凝胶强度发展的方法,即连续旋转和间歇旋转,然后是超声波。本文提出了一项基于实验室的研究,比较了这些测量方法。选择用于比较的浆液框架范围为11.5至18磅/加仑,温度范围为27至121°C。流体体系的配方由G级水泥、二氧化硅粉、加重剂或混合相的轻质扩展剂组成。液相添加剂如消泡剂、失液剂、分散剂和缓凝剂被使用。调整配方以模拟两次放置时间,即一次在3至4小时之间。第二次是7到8小时。在选定的水泥体系上进行的测试提供了测试过程中使用的四种不同类型的静态凝胶强度开发设备的重要知识。有两种设备来自不同的制造商,使用连续旋转方法,然后是间歇旋转和声学类型。为了便于比较,安排了每种浆料的总体平均运输时间和各自的标准偏差。研究发现,与其他流体系统相比,某些流体系统的偏差较小。如API 10B-6所示,由于水泥样品大小、设备配置和配方不同,每种设备都可能产生不同的静态凝胶剖面。浆料配方可以根据需要修改,以改善其过渡时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Utilisation a Hydraulic Workover Unit for Gravel Pack Job in Indonesia The Versatile and Tunable Metal-Organic Framework MOF for Condensate Decontamination Geological Field Characteristic of the Black Shales in the Belata Formation, Peninsular Malaysia An Intelligent Selection Model for Optimum Artificial Lift Method Using Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Approach Noise Logging Application for Well Integrity Evaluation: A Case Study in Peninsular Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1