Incidence of hepatotoxicity associated with addition of immune checkpoint blockade to systemic solid tumor therapy: a meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials.

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Small Group Research Pub Date : 2022-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-26 DOI:10.1007/s00262-022-03203-7
Yu Fujiwara, Nobuyuki Horita, Matthew Harrington, Ho Namkoong, Hirotaka Miyashita, Matthew D Galsky
{"title":"Incidence of hepatotoxicity associated with addition of immune checkpoint blockade to systemic solid tumor therapy: a meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Yu Fujiwara, Nobuyuki Horita, Matthew Harrington, Ho Namkoong, Hirotaka Miyashita, Matthew D Galsky","doi":"10.1007/s00262-022-03203-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hepatotoxicity is a major immune-related adverse event that may become life-threatening. The impact of adding immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) to systemic therapy on the incidence of hepatotoxicity remains unknown. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the incidence of hepatotoxicity among patients with cancer who received therapy with and without addition of ICB. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched to select phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of adding ICB to systemic therapy, placebo, or supportive care. The odds ratio (OR) of any grade and grade 3-5 hepatitis, elevations in aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was pooled for meta-analysis. 43 RCTs with 28,905 participants were analyzed. Addition of ICB increased the incidence of hepatitis (any grade: OR, 2.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52-2.97, grade 3-5: OR, 2.66, 95% CI 1.72-4.11), elevated AST (any grade: OR, 2.16, 95% CI 1.73-2.70, grade 3-5: OR, 2.72, 95% CI 1.86-3.99), and elevated ALT (any grade: OR, 2.01, 95% CI 1.59-2.54, grade 3-5: OR, 2.40, 95% CI 1.62-3.55). Subgroup analysis based on the ICB mechanism revealed no significant heterogeneity among each mechanism for hepatitis (any Grade: I<sup>2</sup> = 11.1%, p for heterogeneity = 0.32, grade 3-5: I<sup>2</sup> = 0%, p = 0.48). Adding ICB to systemic therapy increases the incidence of hepatotoxicity regardless of the mechanism of ICB. Hepatotoxicity is common and vigilant monitoring of liver function is required during ICB therapy for patients with cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":47912,"journal":{"name":"Small Group Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"2837-2848"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10992785/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Small Group Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-022-03203-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hepatotoxicity is a major immune-related adverse event that may become life-threatening. The impact of adding immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) to systemic therapy on the incidence of hepatotoxicity remains unknown. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the incidence of hepatotoxicity among patients with cancer who received therapy with and without addition of ICB. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched to select phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of adding ICB to systemic therapy, placebo, or supportive care. The odds ratio (OR) of any grade and grade 3-5 hepatitis, elevations in aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was pooled for meta-analysis. 43 RCTs with 28,905 participants were analyzed. Addition of ICB increased the incidence of hepatitis (any grade: OR, 2.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52-2.97, grade 3-5: OR, 2.66, 95% CI 1.72-4.11), elevated AST (any grade: OR, 2.16, 95% CI 1.73-2.70, grade 3-5: OR, 2.72, 95% CI 1.86-3.99), and elevated ALT (any grade: OR, 2.01, 95% CI 1.59-2.54, grade 3-5: OR, 2.40, 95% CI 1.62-3.55). Subgroup analysis based on the ICB mechanism revealed no significant heterogeneity among each mechanism for hepatitis (any Grade: I2 = 11.1%, p for heterogeneity = 0.32, grade 3-5: I2 = 0%, p = 0.48). Adding ICB to systemic therapy increases the incidence of hepatotoxicity regardless of the mechanism of ICB. Hepatotoxicity is common and vigilant monitoring of liver function is required during ICB therapy for patients with cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在全身性实体瘤治疗中添加免疫检查点阻断剂相关肝毒性的发生率:3 期随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
肝毒性是一种可能危及生命的主要免疫相关不良事件。在全身治疗中加入免疫检查点阻断剂(ICB)对肝毒性发生率的影响尚不清楚。我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,比较了接受和未接受ICB治疗的癌症患者的肝毒性发生率。我们检索了 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library,选择了评估在全身治疗、安慰剂或支持性治疗中添加 ICB 效果的 3 期随机对照试验 (RCT)。对任何级别和 3-5 级肝炎、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶 (AST) 和丙氨酸氨基转移酶 (ALT) 升高的几率比 (OR) 进行了汇总,并进行了荟萃分析。共分析了 43 项 RCT,28905 名参与者。加入 ICB 会增加肝炎的发病率(任何等级:OR,2.13,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.52-2.97,3-5 级OR,2.66,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.72-4.11)、谷草转氨酶升高(任何等级,OR,2.16,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.72-4.11):任何等级:OR,2.16,95% CI 1.73-2.70,3-5 级:OR,2.72,95% CI 1.72-4.11):OR,2.72,95% CI 1.86-3.99),ALT 升高(任何等级:OR,2.40,95% CI 1.62-3.55)。基于 ICB 机制的亚组分析显示,肝炎的每种机制之间均无显著异质性(任何等级:I2 = 11.1%,异质性 p = 0.32;3-5 级:I2 = 0%,p = 0.48)。无论 ICB 的机制如何,在全身治疗中加入 ICB 都会增加肝毒性的发生率。肝毒性很常见,癌症患者在接受 ICB 治疗期间需要对肝功能进行警惕性监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.40%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Policy: Small Group Research is an international and interdisciplinary journal presenting research, theoretical advancements, and empirically supported applications with respect to all types of small groups. Through advancing the systematic study of small groups, this journal seeks to increase communication among all who are professionally interested in group phenomena.
期刊最新文献
Group Dynamics in the Metaverse: A Conceptual Framework and First Empirical Insights The Science (and Practice) of Teamwork: A Commentary on Forty Years of Progress… Hybrid Teamwork: What We Know and Where We Can Go From Here A Conceptualization of Mood Influences on Group Judgment and Decision Making: The Key Function of Dominant Cognitive Processing Strategies Virtual Teams: Taking Stock and Moving Forward
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1