Investigating Malaise and mobilization effects of media use on European identity before and after the Eurozone Crisis

IF 0.6 Q3 COMMUNICATION Global Media Journal-Canadian Edition Pub Date : 2018-07-13 DOI:10.22032/dbt.35000
W. Ejaz
{"title":"Investigating Malaise and mobilization effects of media use on European identity before and after the Eurozone Crisis","authors":"W. Ejaz","doi":"10.22032/dbt.35000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on European integration posits that people support and identify with the European \nUnion (EU) by considering its economic benefits. Thus, it is argued that people’s sense of \nidentity and their degree of political support for the EU can be explained by estimating the economic \nprosperity it yields. However, the current paper illustrates that in addition to utilitarian factors, \nmedia use can also explain political support for the EU. Thus, to examine this relationship between \npolitical support and the media, the study uses the political support framework by David Easton \nalong with the theoretical underpinnings of the media malaise and media mobilization effects. The \nempirical analysis is conducted on the basis of secondary data obtained through Eurobarometer \nsurveys. Furthermore, to test if the economic factors are a strong predictor of political support, the \nstudy assumes that the recent Eurozone crisis has caused a sharp decline in political support. \nTherefore, it investigates the role of different economic factors and media on political support before \nand after the crisis. The results indicate that consuming information from the television (TV) \ndoes not lead to malaise but rather, that it has a mobilization effect. Furthermore, the results reveal \nthat the respondents’ informed-ness and their TV usage for getting information predict political \nsupport better than the economic indicators.","PeriodicalId":29900,"journal":{"name":"Global Media Journal-Canadian Edition","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Media Journal-Canadian Edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22032/dbt.35000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on European integration posits that people support and identify with the European Union (EU) by considering its economic benefits. Thus, it is argued that people’s sense of identity and their degree of political support for the EU can be explained by estimating the economic prosperity it yields. However, the current paper illustrates that in addition to utilitarian factors, media use can also explain political support for the EU. Thus, to examine this relationship between political support and the media, the study uses the political support framework by David Easton along with the theoretical underpinnings of the media malaise and media mobilization effects. The empirical analysis is conducted on the basis of secondary data obtained through Eurobarometer surveys. Furthermore, to test if the economic factors are a strong predictor of political support, the study assumes that the recent Eurozone crisis has caused a sharp decline in political support. Therefore, it investigates the role of different economic factors and media on political support before and after the crisis. The results indicate that consuming information from the television (TV) does not lead to malaise but rather, that it has a mobilization effect. Furthermore, the results reveal that the respondents’ informed-ness and their TV usage for getting information predict political support better than the economic indicators.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查欧元区危机前后媒体使用对欧洲认同的不安和动员效应
对欧洲一体化的研究认为,人们对欧盟的支持和认同是基于欧盟的经济利益。因此,有人认为,人们的认同感和他们对欧盟的政治支持程度可以通过估计它产生的经济繁荣来解释。然而,本文表明,除了功利因素外,媒体使用也可以解释对欧盟的政治支持。因此,为了检验政治支持与媒体之间的关系,本研究使用了大卫·伊斯顿的政治支持框架以及媒体萎靡和媒体动员效应的理论基础。实证分析是基于Eurobarometer调查获得的二次数据进行的。此外,为了检验经济因素是否能强有力地预测政治支持,该研究假设最近的欧元区危机导致了政治支持的急剧下降。因此,本文考察了危机前后不同经济因素和媒体对政治支持的作用。结果表明,从电视中消费信息不会导致不适,相反,它具有动员效应。此外,结果显示,受访者的知情程度和他们获取信息的电视使用情况比经济指标更能预测政治支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Towards Cosmopolitan Media and Communication Studies: Bringing diverse epistemic perspectives into the field Do YouTubers Hate Asians?: An Analysis of YouTube Users’ Anti-Asian Hatred on Major U.S. News Channels during the COVID-19 Pandemic COVID-19 from the Margins: Crafting a (Cosmopolitan) Theory Towards Cosmopolitanism in German Academia?: Shedding Light on Colonial Underpinnings of Communication Research in a Globalized World Communicating the Environment in Laos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1