{"title":"Investigating Malaise and mobilization effects of media use on European identity before and after the Eurozone Crisis","authors":"W. Ejaz","doi":"10.22032/dbt.35000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on European integration posits that people support and identify with the European \nUnion (EU) by considering its economic benefits. Thus, it is argued that people’s sense of \nidentity and their degree of political support for the EU can be explained by estimating the economic \nprosperity it yields. However, the current paper illustrates that in addition to utilitarian factors, \nmedia use can also explain political support for the EU. Thus, to examine this relationship between \npolitical support and the media, the study uses the political support framework by David Easton \nalong with the theoretical underpinnings of the media malaise and media mobilization effects. The \nempirical analysis is conducted on the basis of secondary data obtained through Eurobarometer \nsurveys. Furthermore, to test if the economic factors are a strong predictor of political support, the \nstudy assumes that the recent Eurozone crisis has caused a sharp decline in political support. \nTherefore, it investigates the role of different economic factors and media on political support before \nand after the crisis. The results indicate that consuming information from the television (TV) \ndoes not lead to malaise but rather, that it has a mobilization effect. Furthermore, the results reveal \nthat the respondents’ informed-ness and their TV usage for getting information predict political \nsupport better than the economic indicators.","PeriodicalId":29900,"journal":{"name":"Global Media Journal-Canadian Edition","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Media Journal-Canadian Edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22032/dbt.35000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Research on European integration posits that people support and identify with the European
Union (EU) by considering its economic benefits. Thus, it is argued that people’s sense of
identity and their degree of political support for the EU can be explained by estimating the economic
prosperity it yields. However, the current paper illustrates that in addition to utilitarian factors,
media use can also explain political support for the EU. Thus, to examine this relationship between
political support and the media, the study uses the political support framework by David Easton
along with the theoretical underpinnings of the media malaise and media mobilization effects. The
empirical analysis is conducted on the basis of secondary data obtained through Eurobarometer
surveys. Furthermore, to test if the economic factors are a strong predictor of political support, the
study assumes that the recent Eurozone crisis has caused a sharp decline in political support.
Therefore, it investigates the role of different economic factors and media on political support before
and after the crisis. The results indicate that consuming information from the television (TV)
does not lead to malaise but rather, that it has a mobilization effect. Furthermore, the results reveal
that the respondents’ informed-ness and their TV usage for getting information predict political
support better than the economic indicators.