Localization of the corporate food regime and the food sovereignty movement: taiwan’s food sovereignty movement under “third regionalism”

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Food Culture & Society Pub Date : 2022-01-28 DOI:10.1080/15528014.2022.2030889
Scott Y. Lin
{"title":"Localization of the corporate food regime and the food sovereignty movement: taiwan’s food sovereignty movement under “third regionalism”","authors":"Scott Y. Lin","doi":"10.1080/15528014.2022.2030889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Third regionalism explains the liberalization of trade centered around the Asia-Pacific region in the 21st century. Under regionalism, domestic agricultural markets that formerly enjoyed national food-security policies have loosened. This caused traditional domestic farmers’ organizations to become more regionally interconnected, forming a food sovereignty movement under the auspices of La Via Campesina. Localized food-production chains are promoted to mitigate the impact of regionalism on the Asia-Pacific agricultural sector. The Taiwan Rural Front (TRF) joined La Via Campesina and the food sovereignty movement in the 2010s. During the process of adopting regionalism, Taiwanese agricultural trade and technologies were protected by public agencies and state-owned enterprises. This context differs from that of Southeast Asia, where the food sovereignty movement has thrived. Therefore, the following question is raised: Why was it possible for the food sovereignty movement to originate in Taiwan? This paper describes the developmental characteristics of Taiwan’s food-security governance mechanism as a state-guided corporate food regime amid third regionalism. Further, the TRF does not advocate for localized food-production chains. Due to the formation of a state-guided corporate food regime, the food sovereignty movement has become connected with farmland protection movements that set the Taiwanese sovereignty movement apart.","PeriodicalId":46299,"journal":{"name":"Food Culture & Society","volume":"15 1","pages":"621 - 642"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2022.2030889","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Third regionalism explains the liberalization of trade centered around the Asia-Pacific region in the 21st century. Under regionalism, domestic agricultural markets that formerly enjoyed national food-security policies have loosened. This caused traditional domestic farmers’ organizations to become more regionally interconnected, forming a food sovereignty movement under the auspices of La Via Campesina. Localized food-production chains are promoted to mitigate the impact of regionalism on the Asia-Pacific agricultural sector. The Taiwan Rural Front (TRF) joined La Via Campesina and the food sovereignty movement in the 2010s. During the process of adopting regionalism, Taiwanese agricultural trade and technologies were protected by public agencies and state-owned enterprises. This context differs from that of Southeast Asia, where the food sovereignty movement has thrived. Therefore, the following question is raised: Why was it possible for the food sovereignty movement to originate in Taiwan? This paper describes the developmental characteristics of Taiwan’s food-security governance mechanism as a state-guided corporate food regime amid third regionalism. Further, the TRF does not advocate for localized food-production chains. Due to the formation of a state-guided corporate food regime, the food sovereignty movement has become connected with farmland protection movements that set the Taiwanese sovereignty movement apart.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业食品制度的本土化与食品主权运动:“第三区域主义”下的台湾食品主权运动
第三,区域主义解释了21世纪以亚太地区为中心的贸易自由化。在地区主义下,以前享受国家粮食安全政策的国内农业市场已经放松。这使得传统的国内农民组织变得更加区域互联,在La Via Campesina的支持下形成了粮食主权运动。促进本地化的粮食生产链,以减轻区域主义对亚太农业部门的影响。台湾农村阵线(TRF)在2010年代加入了“农民之路”和粮食主权运动。在采取区域主义的过程中,台湾农业贸易和技术受到公共机构和国有企业的保护。这种情况与东南亚不同,那里的粮食主权运动蓬勃发展。因此,提出以下问题:为什么食品主权运动可能起源于台湾?本文以第三区域主义为背景,描述国家导向的企业食品制度下台湾食品安全治理机制的发展特征。此外,基金会并不提倡本地化的食品生产链。由于国家主导的企业食品制度的形成,食品主权运动与农地保护运动联系在一起,使台湾主权运动与众不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Food, Culture & Society is published on behalf of the Association for the Study of Food and Society (ASFS). Members receive the journal as part of their membership package. To join the Society or to renew your membership please select the Subscribe/Renew button.
期刊最新文献
Gastroimaginaries: a framework for conceptualizing narratives of food and place in the American South Harnessing food system equity from the ground up: shifting co-governance practices in the funding of food security responses during the pandemic crisis in Toronto, Canada Pigs, planners, and potato peels: the Soviet Scheme to feed pigs with urban food waste as a waste regime under Stalin, Khrushchev, and Brezhnev Exploring veganism in Australia, France, Spain, and Portugal: a netnographic study using the transtheoretical model Digital food TV: the cultural place of food in a digital era
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1