Navigating discipline and indulgence: the performance of contradiction on Instagram food posts in the Philippines

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Food Culture & Society Pub Date : 2022-08-29 DOI:10.1080/15528014.2022.2113285
Kwok Yingchen, M. J. Montefrio, Edson C. Tandoc
{"title":"Navigating discipline and indulgence: the performance of contradiction on Instagram food posts in the Philippines","authors":"Kwok Yingchen, M. J. Montefrio, Edson C. Tandoc","doi":"10.1080/15528014.2022.2113285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT There is a contradictory dynamic in how Instagram seems to promote both profligate consumption habits in disregard of health and unprecedented health anxieties where people micromanage every ingredient they consume. Far from inhabiting disparate social worlds, these themes often coalesce within the same image. We argue that this phenomenon reflects consumers’ attempts to navigate a neoliberal double bind that simultaneously pressures them toward both dysfunctional extremes. By emphasizing the centrality of a politics of indulgence to US ideological warfare, especially during the Green Revolution, we interrogate a key limitation of much critical food scholarship in its reductive equation of whiteness and power with food discipline and thinness. We draw on postcolonial scholarship on mestiza/o whiteness and code-switching to argue that neocolonial privilege is better understood as the mobility to code-switch between the vocabularies of discipline and indulgence without being confined to one or the other. Then, we analyze Instagram food posts taken by customers at organic restaurants in urban Philippines, reading them as innovative but never innocent contestations against the double binds of discipline/indulgence and mestiza/o whiteness while highlighting the rich historical and cultural contingency of their meaning-making.","PeriodicalId":46299,"journal":{"name":"Food Culture & Society","volume":"63 1","pages":"793 - 813"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2022.2113285","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT There is a contradictory dynamic in how Instagram seems to promote both profligate consumption habits in disregard of health and unprecedented health anxieties where people micromanage every ingredient they consume. Far from inhabiting disparate social worlds, these themes often coalesce within the same image. We argue that this phenomenon reflects consumers’ attempts to navigate a neoliberal double bind that simultaneously pressures them toward both dysfunctional extremes. By emphasizing the centrality of a politics of indulgence to US ideological warfare, especially during the Green Revolution, we interrogate a key limitation of much critical food scholarship in its reductive equation of whiteness and power with food discipline and thinness. We draw on postcolonial scholarship on mestiza/o whiteness and code-switching to argue that neocolonial privilege is better understood as the mobility to code-switch between the vocabularies of discipline and indulgence without being confined to one or the other. Then, we analyze Instagram food posts taken by customers at organic restaurants in urban Philippines, reading them as innovative but never innocent contestations against the double binds of discipline/indulgence and mestiza/o whiteness while highlighting the rich historical and cultural contingency of their meaning-making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
驾驭自律和放纵:菲律宾Instagram美食帖子上的矛盾表现
Instagram似乎既促进了不顾健康的挥霍消费习惯,又促进了人们对每一种消费成分的微观管理,这是一种矛盾的动态。这些主题并不存在于完全不同的社会世界中,而是经常在同一个图像中融合在一起。我们认为,这种现象反映了消费者试图驾驭新自由主义的双重束缚,这种双重束缚同时迫使他们走向两个功能失调的极端。通过强调放纵政治在美国意识形态战争中的中心地位,特别是在绿色革命期间,我们质疑了许多批判性食品学术的一个关键局限性,即它将白色和力量与食物纪律和薄度简化为一个简化的等式。我们利用后殖民时期关于混血人/非白人和编码转换的学术研究,认为新殖民主义特权最好被理解为在纪律和放纵的词汇之间进行编码转换的流动性,而不局限于其中一个。然后,我们分析了菲律宾城市有机餐厅的顾客在Instagram上拍摄的美食照片,将它们解读为对纪律/放纵和混血人/非白人双重束缚的创新但绝不是无辜的争论,同时强调了其意义形成的丰富的历史和文化偶然性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Food, Culture & Society is published on behalf of the Association for the Study of Food and Society (ASFS). Members receive the journal as part of their membership package. To join the Society or to renew your membership please select the Subscribe/Renew button.
期刊最新文献
Gastroimaginaries: a framework for conceptualizing narratives of food and place in the American South Harnessing food system equity from the ground up: shifting co-governance practices in the funding of food security responses during the pandemic crisis in Toronto, Canada Pigs, planners, and potato peels: the Soviet Scheme to feed pigs with urban food waste as a waste regime under Stalin, Khrushchev, and Brezhnev Exploring veganism in Australia, France, Spain, and Portugal: a netnographic study using the transtheoretical model Digital food TV: the cultural place of food in a digital era
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1