{"title":"The Effect of Audit Tenure, Audit Rotation and Client's Company Size on Audit Quality with Audit Fee as Moderating Variable","authors":"Humaira Dinda Mulyadi, D. Suryandari","doi":"10.47153/AFS13.1792021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transparency of financial reports is one of the important things for decision-makers. In proving that financial statement information has been presented fairly, companies need independent parties, one of which is the audit services provided by the Public Accounting Firm (PAF). Good or bad Audit Quality for the information presented really depends on the auditor in carrying out his duties. \nThis research was conducted at Financial Sector Companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in 2015 - 2019. This research was conducted using quantitative methods and sample selection using purposive sampling method. The analysis used in this research is binary logistic regression. \nThe results showed that Audit Tenure and Audit Rotation had no effect on Audit Quality, Client's Company Size had a negative effect on Audit Quality, and Audit Fees had a positive effect on Audit Quality. Audit Fee Interactions are unable to moderate the effect of Audit Tenure and Audit Rotation on Audit Quality, while Audit Fee Interactions are able to weaken the influence of Client's Company Size on Audit Quality. \nSuggestions from this research are expected to all companies that have high complexity to choose a PAF that suits the audit needs and not too pressurize the Audit Fee given. In addition, companies need to pay attention to Audit Tenure again by considering from a cost-benefit analysis point of view. For future researchers, it is expected to extend the research period and use Audit Quality proxies, population, methods, and analysis tools outside of this study.","PeriodicalId":47285,"journal":{"name":"Abacus-A Journal of Accounting Finance and Business Studies","volume":"55 32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abacus-A Journal of Accounting Finance and Business Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47153/AFS13.1792021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Transparency of financial reports is one of the important things for decision-makers. In proving that financial statement information has been presented fairly, companies need independent parties, one of which is the audit services provided by the Public Accounting Firm (PAF). Good or bad Audit Quality for the information presented really depends on the auditor in carrying out his duties.
This research was conducted at Financial Sector Companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in 2015 - 2019. This research was conducted using quantitative methods and sample selection using purposive sampling method. The analysis used in this research is binary logistic regression.
The results showed that Audit Tenure and Audit Rotation had no effect on Audit Quality, Client's Company Size had a negative effect on Audit Quality, and Audit Fees had a positive effect on Audit Quality. Audit Fee Interactions are unable to moderate the effect of Audit Tenure and Audit Rotation on Audit Quality, while Audit Fee Interactions are able to weaken the influence of Client's Company Size on Audit Quality.
Suggestions from this research are expected to all companies that have high complexity to choose a PAF that suits the audit needs and not too pressurize the Audit Fee given. In addition, companies need to pay attention to Audit Tenure again by considering from a cost-benefit analysis point of view. For future researchers, it is expected to extend the research period and use Audit Quality proxies, population, methods, and analysis tools outside of this study.
期刊介绍:
Since 1965 Abacus has consistently provided a vehicle for the expression of independent and critical thought on matters of current academic and professional interest in accounting, finance and business. The journal reports current research; critically evaluates current developments in theory and practice; analyses the effects of the regulatory framework of accounting, finance and business; and explores alternatives to, and explanations of, past and current practices.