The FEL-Agile Hybrid Approach to Selecting the ‘Right’ Oil & Gas project

Ashvin Nesan
{"title":"The FEL-Agile Hybrid Approach to Selecting the ‘Right’ Oil & Gas project","authors":"Ashvin Nesan","doi":"10.4043/31659-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The front-end loading (FEL) project management process is a method that is trusted and ingrained into most Exploration and Production oil and gas companies worldwide. The entire FEL is modeled after the Waterfall model which is sequential in nature. The waterfall model can be construed to be too slow in adapting to changes resulting in a significant number of oil and gas projects having a high tendency of cost overruns, schedule delays and not meeting stakeholder objectives. On the other hand, the agile model employed by IT, software and technology companies offers a refreshing view to achieving the desired result in projects. However, these two industries have substantial differences between them, for example in project value and regulation. This explains the reluctance by major oil and gas companies to implement agile as part of their project management approach. Nevertheless, as the environmental and organizational factors in project management in all sectors are changing at a rapid pace, seeking alternative and workable approach is vital. The paper seeks to evaluate the concept of adapting the agile methodology for FEL in oil and gas field development projects. The paper identifies areas for integrating agile such as in FEL selection criteria and further suggests to seek a balance between the two contrasting methods. Overall, the results from a case study in the oil and gas industry indicates that by adapting agile approach into the current FEL practice, it's more likely that the right project would be sanctioned, therefore, increasing the chances of project success.","PeriodicalId":11081,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, March 23, 2022","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, March 23, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/31659-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The front-end loading (FEL) project management process is a method that is trusted and ingrained into most Exploration and Production oil and gas companies worldwide. The entire FEL is modeled after the Waterfall model which is sequential in nature. The waterfall model can be construed to be too slow in adapting to changes resulting in a significant number of oil and gas projects having a high tendency of cost overruns, schedule delays and not meeting stakeholder objectives. On the other hand, the agile model employed by IT, software and technology companies offers a refreshing view to achieving the desired result in projects. However, these two industries have substantial differences between them, for example in project value and regulation. This explains the reluctance by major oil and gas companies to implement agile as part of their project management approach. Nevertheless, as the environmental and organizational factors in project management in all sectors are changing at a rapid pace, seeking alternative and workable approach is vital. The paper seeks to evaluate the concept of adapting the agile methodology for FEL in oil and gas field development projects. The paper identifies areas for integrating agile such as in FEL selection criteria and further suggests to seek a balance between the two contrasting methods. Overall, the results from a case study in the oil and gas industry indicates that by adapting agile approach into the current FEL practice, it's more likely that the right project would be sanctioned, therefore, increasing the chances of project success.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择“正确”油气项目的FEL-Agile混合方法
前端加载(FEL)项目管理流程是全球大多数勘探和生产石油和天然气公司所信赖和根深蒂固的一种方法。整个FEL模型是在瀑布模型的基础上建立的,瀑布模型本质上是顺序的。瀑布模型在适应变化方面过于缓慢,导致大量油气项目存在成本超支、进度延迟和无法满足利益相关者目标的高趋势。另一方面,IT、软件和技术公司采用的敏捷模型为在项目中实现期望的结果提供了一个令人耳目一新的视角。然而,这两个行业之间存在着实质性的差异,例如在项目价值和监管方面。这就解释了为什么大型油气公司不愿意将敏捷作为其项目管理方法的一部分。然而,由于所有部门的项目管理中的环境和组织因素正在迅速变化,因此寻求其他可行的办法是至关重要的。本文旨在评价在油气田开发项目中采用敏捷方法进行自由自由的概念。本文指出了集成敏捷的领域,如自由电子实验室的选择标准,并进一步建议在两种对比方法之间寻求平衡。总的来说,油气行业的案例研究结果表明,通过将敏捷方法应用到当前的FEL实践中,更有可能批准正确的项目,因此,增加了项目成功的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Utilisation a Hydraulic Workover Unit for Gravel Pack Job in Indonesia The Versatile and Tunable Metal-Organic Framework MOF for Condensate Decontamination Geological Field Characteristic of the Black Shales in the Belata Formation, Peninsular Malaysia An Intelligent Selection Model for Optimum Artificial Lift Method Using Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Approach Noise Logging Application for Well Integrity Evaluation: A Case Study in Peninsular Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1