Using Textbooks in Developing Learner Autonomy: Contradictio in Adjecto?

C. Ludwig
{"title":"Using Textbooks in Developing Learner Autonomy: Contradictio in Adjecto?","authors":"\tC. Ludwig","doi":"10.47908/9/7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"methods and materials. Against this background, an increasing number of teachers committed to learner autonomy attempt to support their students in taking over responsibility for their own learning. This, apart from discovering and developing cognitive learning strategies, includes a gradually increasing awareness of all steps involved in the learning process at a meta-cognitive level. Especially when it comes to textbooks, however, freedom of choice is often all too well given up by teachers although textbooks are per se understood as something which enforces the classic division of roles in the classroom and thus hinder the development of autonomy. Nevertheless, textbooks still enjoy an almost sacrosanct status in many classrooms for a number of reasons. From the teachers’ perspective, textbooks are often believed to mirror the curriculum and thus contain everything that students need to learn. For students, the raison d’être of textbooks is often that they present what they believe their teachers and/or the institution expect them to learn. In this article I shall elaborate on some of the myths surrounding textbooks and discuss possibilities of using the textbook in the autonomy classroom by drawing on examples from one of my own Business English courses.","PeriodicalId":23709,"journal":{"name":"Volume 5 - 2020, Issue 9 - September","volume":"86 1","pages":"The Answer is Learner Autonomy: Issues in Language Teaching and Learning."},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 5 - 2020, Issue 9 - September","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47908/9/7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

methods and materials. Against this background, an increasing number of teachers committed to learner autonomy attempt to support their students in taking over responsibility for their own learning. This, apart from discovering and developing cognitive learning strategies, includes a gradually increasing awareness of all steps involved in the learning process at a meta-cognitive level. Especially when it comes to textbooks, however, freedom of choice is often all too well given up by teachers although textbooks are per se understood as something which enforces the classic division of roles in the classroom and thus hinder the development of autonomy. Nevertheless, textbooks still enjoy an almost sacrosanct status in many classrooms for a number of reasons. From the teachers’ perspective, textbooks are often believed to mirror the curriculum and thus contain everything that students need to learn. For students, the raison d’être of textbooks is often that they present what they believe their teachers and/or the institution expect them to learn. In this article I shall elaborate on some of the myths surrounding textbooks and discuss possibilities of using the textbook in the autonomy classroom by drawing on examples from one of my own Business English courses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用教材培养学习者自主性:形容词的矛盾?
方法和材料。在此背景下,越来越多致力于学习者自主的教师试图支持学生承担起自主学习的责任。这除了发现和发展认知学习策略外,还包括在元认知水平上逐渐提高对学习过程中所有步骤的认识。然而,特别是在教科书方面,尽管教科书本身被理解为在课堂上强制执行经典角色分工的东西,从而阻碍了自主性的发展,但教师们往往放弃了选择的自由。然而,由于种种原因,教科书在许多教室里仍然享有几乎神圣不可侵犯的地位。从教师的角度来看,教科书通常被认为反映了课程,因此包含了学生需要学习的一切。对学生来说,教科书之所以“être”,往往是因为它们展示了他们认为老师和/或学校希望他们学到的东西。在这篇文章中,我将详细阐述一些关于教科书的神话,并通过我自己的一门商务英语课程中的例子来讨论在自主课堂中使用教科书的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Le biodéchet, une notion à stabiliser pour une meilleure valorisation Recyclabilité d’un emballage : Évaluation de la triabilité avec la technologie RFID Évaluation de la circularité des déblais comme critère d’achat éco-responsable dans les marchés de travaux Some features of short-term blood pressure variability in patients with arterial hypertension in comparison with healthy volunteers Translational medicine: ways of development in modern conditions, problems and prospects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1