Expert Validation and Students’ Initial Field Trial Responses toward M-Write Academic Essay Writing Application

W. K. Sumarno, Dwi Wahyuningtyas, T. Ardianti, Adinda Aulia Rahmawati, Putri Shafira, Nur Imro’atus Solikha
{"title":"Expert Validation and Students’ Initial Field Trial Responses toward M-Write Academic Essay Writing Application","authors":"W. K. Sumarno, Dwi Wahyuningtyas, T. Ardianti, Adinda Aulia Rahmawati, Putri Shafira, Nur Imro’atus Solikha","doi":"10.31002/metathesis.v5i2.4375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proficiency in English academic writing is still a problem for many students. However, there are no such digital learning media that facilitates academic writing practices. Considering these problems, this research tried to develop an M-Write application, a learning media that combine metacognitive and process-genre writing exercises. This study aims to determine the feasibility level of M-Write as a website-based academic essay writing application. The method used in testing the feasibility of this product includes the alpha test and beta test. The alpha test was carried out by three English Education experts; each of them assessed the aspects of the content, language use, and design. While the beta test was carried out by 25 students of the Computer Science Faculty, UPN “Veteran” Jawa Timur. The data collection technique was done by using a questionnaire and interview. Data analysis was carried out using quantitative descriptive techniques. The results of this study indicate that the M-Write application reached appropriate criteria in terms of content, language use, and design aspects. The percentages of each of these aspects are 71.9%, 73.3%, and 71.9%. While the results of the applications usage assessment by students also showed that the application was appropriate to be used with an average percentage of 75.9%.","PeriodicalId":34019,"journal":{"name":"Metathesis Journal of English Language Literature and Teaching","volume":"116 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metathesis Journal of English Language Literature and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v5i2.4375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Proficiency in English academic writing is still a problem for many students. However, there are no such digital learning media that facilitates academic writing practices. Considering these problems, this research tried to develop an M-Write application, a learning media that combine metacognitive and process-genre writing exercises. This study aims to determine the feasibility level of M-Write as a website-based academic essay writing application. The method used in testing the feasibility of this product includes the alpha test and beta test. The alpha test was carried out by three English Education experts; each of them assessed the aspects of the content, language use, and design. While the beta test was carried out by 25 students of the Computer Science Faculty, UPN “Veteran” Jawa Timur. The data collection technique was done by using a questionnaire and interview. Data analysis was carried out using quantitative descriptive techniques. The results of this study indicate that the M-Write application reached appropriate criteria in terms of content, language use, and design aspects. The percentages of each of these aspects are 71.9%, 73.3%, and 71.9%. While the results of the applications usage assessment by students also showed that the application was appropriate to be used with an average percentage of 75.9%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专家验证与学生对M-Write学术论文写作申请的初步现场试验反应
英语学术写作的熟练程度对许多学生来说仍然是一个问题。然而,目前还没有这样的数字学习媒体来促进学术写作练习。考虑到这些问题,本研究试图开发M-Write应用程序,这是一种结合元认知和过程体裁写作练习的学习媒体。本研究旨在确定M-Write作为一个基于网站的学术论文写作应用的可行性水平。用于测试本产品可行性的方法包括alpha测试和beta测试。alpha测试由三位英语教育专家进行;他们每个人都评估了内容、语言使用和设计的各个方面。虽然测试是由计算机科学学院的25名学生进行的,UPN“老兵”Jawa Timur。数据收集技术采用问卷调查和访谈法。采用定量描述技术进行数据分析。本研究结果表明,M-Write应用程序在内容、语言使用和设计方面达到了适当的标准。这三个方面的比例分别为71.9%、73.3%和71.9%。而学生对应用程序使用情况的评估结果也显示该应用程序适合使用,平均百分比为75.9%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Teachers’ Competence Among the Student Teachers: An Analysis of Self-Reflective Feedback in Microteaching Class Students’ Difficulties in Speaking English as a Foreign Language: Undergraduate Students’ Voices Reading Material-Based Content Analysis in Senior High School English Textbooks in Indonesia The Effect of Using Classcraft on EFL Students’ Reading Comprehension Students' Perceptions of Kahoot as an Online Quiz Tool in Intensive English Class
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1