On a Possibility of Artificial Reason

Q4 Medicine Jahr Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.21860/j.12.2.9
Hyeongjoo Kim, Jinkyu Jeong
{"title":"On a Possibility of Artificial Reason","authors":"Hyeongjoo Kim, Jinkyu Jeong","doi":"10.21860/j.12.2.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to explore the possibility of reconciliation between Kant’s transcendental idealism and McCarthy’s epistemological point of view on artificial intelligence, which are at first glance likely to be considered contradictory. For this, characterizing the standpoint of J. McCarthy, who coined the word ‘artificial intelligence’ as scientific realism and that of A. Turing, who provided a crucial thought experiment that shaped the contemporary conception of artificial intelligence as behaviorism, we shall compare these two standpoints with the transcendental idealism of I. Kant, who conferred on us a monumental indicator for understanding the human reason. Through this comparison, we shall argue that scientific realism, which is currently a prominent philosophical standpoint of artificial intelligence, is not compatible with Kant’s transcendental idealism but assumes a standpoint strikingly analogous to behaviorism. Nevertheless, we shall also argue that once transcendental idealism is looked at from the viewpoint of behaviorism, scientific realism can be seen as compatible with transcendental idealism. This compatibility we name the possibility of artificial reason in this paper.","PeriodicalId":37490,"journal":{"name":"Jahr","volume":"87 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jahr","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21860/j.12.2.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the possibility of reconciliation between Kant’s transcendental idealism and McCarthy’s epistemological point of view on artificial intelligence, which are at first glance likely to be considered contradictory. For this, characterizing the standpoint of J. McCarthy, who coined the word ‘artificial intelligence’ as scientific realism and that of A. Turing, who provided a crucial thought experiment that shaped the contemporary conception of artificial intelligence as behaviorism, we shall compare these two standpoints with the transcendental idealism of I. Kant, who conferred on us a monumental indicator for understanding the human reason. Through this comparison, we shall argue that scientific realism, which is currently a prominent philosophical standpoint of artificial intelligence, is not compatible with Kant’s transcendental idealism but assumes a standpoint strikingly analogous to behaviorism. Nevertheless, we shall also argue that once transcendental idealism is looked at from the viewpoint of behaviorism, scientific realism can be seen as compatible with transcendental idealism. This compatibility we name the possibility of artificial reason in this paper.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论人工理性的可能性
本研究的目的是探讨康德的先验唯心主义与麦卡锡的人工智能认识论观点之间调和的可能性,这两种观点乍一看可能被认为是矛盾的。为此,我们将j·麦卡锡(J. McCarthy)和a·图灵(a . Turing)的观点进行比较,前者创造了“人工智能”一词,作为科学现实主义,后者提供了一个关键的思想实验,塑造了人工智能作为行为主义的当代概念,我们将把这两种观点与康德(I. Kant)的先验唯心主义进行比较,康德为我们理解人类理性提供了一个不朽的指标。通过这种比较,我们将论证科学实在论,这是目前人工智能的一个突出的哲学立场,它与康德的先验唯心主义是不相容的,而是采取了一个与行为主义惊人相似的立场。然而,我们也将论证,一旦从行为主义的观点来看先验唯心主义,科学实在论可以被视为与先验唯心主义相容。本文将这种相容性称为人为理性的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jahr
Jahr Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: JAHR – EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS is a journal that deals with a wide range of bioethical topics. The aim of the Editorial Board is to publish articles related to bioethics in social sciences (sociology, psychology, law, political science, information and communication sciences, pedagogy, education and rehabilitation sciences, speech-language pathology, kinesiology, demography, social activities, security and defence sciences, economics), humanities (philosophy, theology, philology, history, art history, archaeology, ethnology and anthropology, religious sciences), biomedical (medicine, public health, veterinary medicine, dentistry and pharmacology), but also in other sciences. The journal is published twice a year.
期刊最新文献
Primjena Nacionalnih smjernica za rad izvanbolničke i bolničke hitne medicinske službe s pacijentima kojima je potrebna palijativna skrb A Study on the Analysis of the Interrelationship between the Epic of Gilgamesh and the Bible Using Text Mining Ispitivanje znanja romskih žena o reproduktivnom zdravlju u romskoj zajednici grada Rijeke Tečajevi/radionice likovne kulture i osobe starije od 50 godina Bioetika, umjetnost i tjelesna kateksa u osoba s invaliditetom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1