A Challenge to Reproductive Futurism: Queer Families and Nonhuman Companionships in Ueda Sayuri's The Ocean Chronicles

Kazue Harada
{"title":"A Challenge to Reproductive Futurism: Queer Families and Nonhuman Companionships in Ueda Sayuri's The Ocean Chronicles","authors":"Kazue Harada","doi":"10.1353/JWJ.2017.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and Methodology Science fiction novels typically create elaborate, multilayered worlds that often, and sometimes literally, turn our own world upside down. In her series The Ocean Chronicles (Ōshan kuronikuru shirīzu), Ueda Sayuri (b. 1964) depicts a post-apocalyptic world that discourages human reproduction and anticipates the extinction of the human race. I argue that she does so to challenge the notion of “reproductive futurism,” to borrow a term coined by Lee Edelman (2004, 2) to describe the belief that having children will ensure the future that underlies many policies in Japan and other nations. In No Future: Queer Theories and the Death Drive, Edelman (2004) discusses how reproductive futurism is deeply embedded in the ideological and political discourse of heteronormativity. Using psychoanalysis, he argues that “queerness” is at the opposite end of the spectrum—“the place of the social order’s death drive”—which resists reproductive futurism (Edelman 2004, 2-3). The concept of futurism is also limited by the fact that we do not know what the future will bring. It is, inherently, human speculation or imagination of the present. However, the belief that humans must reproduce to ensure a future is expected and prevalent as a norm. While Edelman is concerned with LGBT activism, I apply his explanation of queerness and how it is a critique of heteronormativity to the","PeriodicalId":88338,"journal":{"name":"U.S.-Japan women's journal. English supplement = Nichi-Bei josei janaru. English supplement","volume":"3 1","pages":"46 - 66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"U.S.-Japan women's journal. English supplement = Nichi-Bei josei janaru. English supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/JWJ.2017.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction and Methodology Science fiction novels typically create elaborate, multilayered worlds that often, and sometimes literally, turn our own world upside down. In her series The Ocean Chronicles (Ōshan kuronikuru shirīzu), Ueda Sayuri (b. 1964) depicts a post-apocalyptic world that discourages human reproduction and anticipates the extinction of the human race. I argue that she does so to challenge the notion of “reproductive futurism,” to borrow a term coined by Lee Edelman (2004, 2) to describe the belief that having children will ensure the future that underlies many policies in Japan and other nations. In No Future: Queer Theories and the Death Drive, Edelman (2004) discusses how reproductive futurism is deeply embedded in the ideological and political discourse of heteronormativity. Using psychoanalysis, he argues that “queerness” is at the opposite end of the spectrum—“the place of the social order’s death drive”—which resists reproductive futurism (Edelman 2004, 2-3). The concept of futurism is also limited by the fact that we do not know what the future will bring. It is, inherently, human speculation or imagination of the present. However, the belief that humans must reproduce to ensure a future is expected and prevalent as a norm. While Edelman is concerned with LGBT activism, I apply his explanation of queerness and how it is a critique of heteronormativity to the
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对生殖未来主义的挑战:上田小百合《海洋编年史》中的酷儿家庭和非人类友谊
科幻小说通常会创造出复杂的、多层次的世界,有时甚至会把我们自己的世界颠倒过来。上田小百合(生于1964年)在她的《海洋编年史》(Ōshan kuronikuru shirhirzu)系列中描绘了一个后世界末日的世界,这个世界不鼓励人类繁殖,并预言了人类的灭绝。我认为她这样做是为了挑战“生育未来主义”的概念,借用李·埃德尔曼(Lee Edelman, 2004, 2)创造的一个术语来描述有孩子将确保未来的信念,这是日本和其他国家许多政策的基础。埃德尔曼(2004)在《没有未来:酷儿理论和死亡驱动》一书中讨论了生殖未来主义如何深深嵌入到异性恋规范的意识形态和政治话语中。利用精神分析,他认为“酷儿”是在光谱的另一端——“社会秩序的死亡驱动的地方”——它抵制生殖未来主义(Edelman 2004,2 -3)。未来主义的概念也受到我们不知道未来会带来什么的事实的限制。它本质上是人类对当下的猜测或想象。然而,人类必须繁殖以确保未来的信念被认为是一种常态。埃德尔曼关注的是LGBT激进主义,我将他对酷儿的解释以及它是如何批判异性恋规范的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Koigoromo (Robe of Love) Part 1: An Introduction and Translation of Yamakawa Tomiko’s “White Lily” / 『恋衣』英訳(1) :解説、山川登美子の「白百合」 Crafting Survival: Chamorro and Okinawan Women’s Camp Labor in the Northern Mariana Islands, 1944–1946 / 生きるための工芸:北マリアナ諸島の米軍民間人収容所におけるチャモ ロ・沖縄女性の労働(1944–1946 年) Defending the Samurai: Alice Mabel Bacon and Meiji Japan at War / 侍を擁護して:アリス・メーベル・ベーコンと戦時下の明治日本 Koigoromo (Robe of Love) Part 1: An Introduction and Translation of Yamakawa Tomiko’s “White Lily” 『恋衣』英訳(1) :解説、山川登美子の「白百合」 Defending the Samurai: Alice Mabel Bacon and Meiji Japan at War 侍を擁護して:アリス・メーベル・ベーコンと戦時下の明治日本
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1