The meaning of the organic certification label for the consumer: a cluster analysis

IF 1.8 Q3 MANAGEMENT REGE-Revista de Gestao Pub Date : 2016-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rege.2016.08.001
David Barros Rodrigues, Denise de Abreu Sofiatti Dalmarco, Cássio Aoqui, Bernadete de Lourdes Marinho
{"title":"The meaning of the organic certification label for the consumer: a cluster analysis","authors":"David Barros Rodrigues,&nbsp;Denise de Abreu Sofiatti Dalmarco,&nbsp;Cássio Aoqui,&nbsp;Bernadete de Lourdes Marinho","doi":"10.1016/j.rege.2016.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Academia has been analyzing organic certification labels for at least 10 years, with emphasis on their importance and level of knowledge. However, little has been written about the associations and meanings they have for consumers. This article aims to study this meaning through a quantitative research, <em>survey</em> type, with 388 respondents. The data were analyzed through a <em>cluster analysis</em> which revealed the existence of three customer groups, according to the meaning assigned to the labels. The three segments were called “Greeners”, “GMO-Freers” and “Don’t Carers”. The first group, the “Greeners”, is the largest (46.6%), and brings greater association with the meanings “sustainable agriculture” and “environmentally friendly” and is associated with older people. The second, the “GMO-Freers”, presents closer association with the meaning “It does not make use of genetically modified/transgenic seeds” and is related to people who have already done post-graduation courses (24.7% of respondents). Finally, the third, “Don’t Carers”, (28.7%), shows lower association to the label's meanings in general, and is also more concentrated in an elite group of consumers. The research comes to the conclusion that the label's meanings may change according to different consumer profiles. On theoretical grounds the present study fills a gap in the literature in a way that it deepens a first analysis of the label's meaning, by reaching a second level of consumer attributions, and revealing the need for understanding this meaning among different groups. Based on the consumer behavior model presented by <span>Kotler and Keller (2012)</span>, it is possible to show how consumers’ psychological aspects can be influenced by social characteristics in the way the groups perceive organic labels. The practical contributions to manufacturers and certifying agencies of organic products are also discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43596,"journal":{"name":"REGE-Revista de Gestao","volume":"23 4","pages":"Pages 316-325"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rege.2016.08.001","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REGE-Revista de Gestao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1809227616306087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Academia has been analyzing organic certification labels for at least 10 years, with emphasis on their importance and level of knowledge. However, little has been written about the associations and meanings they have for consumers. This article aims to study this meaning through a quantitative research, survey type, with 388 respondents. The data were analyzed through a cluster analysis which revealed the existence of three customer groups, according to the meaning assigned to the labels. The three segments were called “Greeners”, “GMO-Freers” and “Don’t Carers”. The first group, the “Greeners”, is the largest (46.6%), and brings greater association with the meanings “sustainable agriculture” and “environmentally friendly” and is associated with older people. The second, the “GMO-Freers”, presents closer association with the meaning “It does not make use of genetically modified/transgenic seeds” and is related to people who have already done post-graduation courses (24.7% of respondents). Finally, the third, “Don’t Carers”, (28.7%), shows lower association to the label's meanings in general, and is also more concentrated in an elite group of consumers. The research comes to the conclusion that the label's meanings may change according to different consumer profiles. On theoretical grounds the present study fills a gap in the literature in a way that it deepens a first analysis of the label's meaning, by reaching a second level of consumer attributions, and revealing the need for understanding this meaning among different groups. Based on the consumer behavior model presented by Kotler and Keller (2012), it is possible to show how consumers’ psychological aspects can be influenced by social characteristics in the way the groups perceive organic labels. The practical contributions to manufacturers and certifying agencies of organic products are also discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有机认证标签对消费者的意义:聚类分析
学术界已经对有机认证标签进行了至少10年的分析,强调其重要性和知识水平。然而,很少有人写它们对消费者的联系和意义。本文旨在通过定量研究、问卷调查的方式来研究这一意义,共有388名受访者。数据分析通过聚类分析,揭示了三个客户群的存在,根据分配给标签的意义。这三个部分分别被称为“绿色主义者”、“转基因自由主义者”和“不关心者”。第一个群体是“绿色主义者”,是最大的(46.6%),与“可持续农业”和“环境友好”的含义联系更紧密,与老年人联系在一起。其次是“GMO-Freers”,与“不使用转基因/转基因种子”的含义联系更紧密,并且与已经完成毕业后课程的人有关(24.7%的受访者)。最后是“Don 't careers”(28.7%),总体上与标签含义的关联度较低,也更集中在精英消费者群体中。研究得出的结论是,标签的含义可能会根据不同的消费者特征而变化。在理论基础上,本研究填补了文献中的空白,通过达到消费者归因的第二个层次,加深了对标签含义的第一个分析,并揭示了在不同群体中理解这一含义的必要性。根据Kotler和Keller(2012)提出的消费者行为模型,有可能显示消费者的心理方面如何受到群体感知有机标签的社会特征的影响。本文还讨论了对有机产品制造商和认证机构的实际贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
39
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sessão especial - Fast Track SEMEAD: Tem ação nessa pesquisa? Um levantamento da pesquisa‐ação como estratégia de pesquisa qualitativa Sessão especial - Fast Track SEMEAD: Comportamento de cidadania organizacional: sua interação com os valores organizacionais e a satisfação no trabalho Propriedades psicométricas das medidas do Questionário Psicossocial de Copenhague I (COPSOQ I), versão curta Participação social nos serviços públicos: caracterização do estado da arte por meio da bibliometria e da revisão sistemática Sessão especial - Fast Track SEMEAD: Potencialidades e desafios na articulação entre a memória e a aprendizagem organizacional: o Centro de Memória Bunge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1