Baremación de una prueba estandarizada de resúmenes (RESUMeV) para los niveles de 4° y 6° de educación primaria

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinica Y Salud Pub Date : 2015-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clysa.2015.01.001
José A. León , José D. Moreno , Lorena A.M. Arnal , Inmaculada Escudero , Ricardo Olmos
{"title":"Baremación de una prueba estandarizada de resúmenes (RESUMeV) para los niveles de 4° y 6° de educación primaria","authors":"José A. León ,&nbsp;José D. Moreno ,&nbsp;Lorena A.M. Arnal ,&nbsp;Inmaculada Escudero ,&nbsp;Ricardo Olmos","doi":"10.1016/j.clysa.2015.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this work was to collect construct and criterion-related evidence of validity for a summary test (RESUMeV) designed to assess students from fourth and sixth grade. The sample of this study consisted of 528 children, 236 from fourth grade and 296 from sixth grade. They were drawn from 21 different primary schools. Several criteria were used. To evaluate the internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha was calculated for all summary evaluation criteria (content, coherence, and style); a homogeneity index (Hj) was calculated too. The validity was evaluated by comparing academic levels. As for the results, both reliability and validity indices were high and significant. These results provide empirical evidence for the validity of the summary test.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45730,"journal":{"name":"Clinica Y Salud","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.clysa.2015.01.001","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica Y Salud","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130527415000043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to collect construct and criterion-related evidence of validity for a summary test (RESUMeV) designed to assess students from fourth and sixth grade. The sample of this study consisted of 528 children, 236 from fourth grade and 296 from sixth grade. They were drawn from 21 different primary schools. Several criteria were used. To evaluate the internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha was calculated for all summary evaluation criteria (content, coherence, and style); a homogeneity index (Hj) was calculated too. The validity was evaluated by comparing academic levels. As for the results, both reliability and validity indices were high and significant. These results provide empirical evidence for the validity of the summary test.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为小学四年级和六年级制定标准化摘要测试(RESUMeV)
本研究的目的是为四年级和六年级学生的总结测试(RESUMeV)收集结构和标准相关的效度证据。本研究的样本包括528名儿童,其中四年级236名,六年级296名。他们来自21所不同的小学。使用了几个标准。为了评估内部一致性,对所有总结评价标准(内容、连贯性和风格)计算Cronbach’s alpha;并计算了均匀性指数(Hj)。通过比较学术水平来评估效度。结果显示信度和效度指标均较高且显著。这些结果为总结检验的有效性提供了经验证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinica Y Salud
Clinica Y Salud PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
16
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sobre la Validez y Eficacia de la Hipnosis Clínica. Valoración Crítica del Documento Observatorio OMC contra las Pseudociencias, Pseudoterapias, Intrusismo y Sectas Sanitarias en relación con la Hipnoterapia Un estudio de caso de trastorno adaptativo con ansiedad por situación de sobrecarga laboral Trastorno de síntomas somáticos: de la sospecha de simulación al tratamiento cognitivo-conductual Psychological characteristics of dissociation in general population Espiritualmente resilientes. Relación entre espiritualidad y resiliencia en cuidados paliativos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1