Thiago Henrique Moreira Goes , Helder Henrique Martins , Cláudio Antonio Pinheiro Machado Filho
{"title":"Desempenho financeiro de empresas com características familiares: análise de empresas brasileiras listadas na BM&F","authors":"Thiago Henrique Moreira Goes , Helder Henrique Martins , Cláudio Antonio Pinheiro Machado Filho","doi":"10.1016/j.rege.2016.06.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study sought to understand the difference between financial performance of companies with family characteristics vis‐à‐vis non‐family companies. We used the references of Anderson and Reeb (2003), Lee (2006) and Martinez et al. (2007). This research had a quantitative nature through analysis of variance with the use of covariates (ANCOVA), as well as a robustness test from two multiple regressions. The dependent variables were the costly liabilities and net operating profit. The independent variables were the company's characteristics (family ownership control, presence of family members in the presidency or vice‐presidency of the board and the presence of family members occupying positions of president or vice president). Covariates were chosen as the size of the company (through Total Assets), age (time of foundation) and the sector of the company (from the rank of BM&FBovespa). For multiple regressions, the dependent variables were the Market Value and Enterprise Value. The results obtained show differences to financial results of each type of company. For costly liabilities, the presence of familiar attributes contributed to a lower recurrence of the use of third‐party capital. In net operating profit, the results of companies with familiar attributes were lower than non‐family firms. In the regressions, the results of family firms were worse than the non‐familiar.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43596,"journal":{"name":"REGE-Revista de Gestao","volume":"24 3","pages":"Pages 197-209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rege.2016.06.011","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REGE-Revista de Gestao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1809227617301492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
This study sought to understand the difference between financial performance of companies with family characteristics vis‐à‐vis non‐family companies. We used the references of Anderson and Reeb (2003), Lee (2006) and Martinez et al. (2007). This research had a quantitative nature through analysis of variance with the use of covariates (ANCOVA), as well as a robustness test from two multiple regressions. The dependent variables were the costly liabilities and net operating profit. The independent variables were the company's characteristics (family ownership control, presence of family members in the presidency or vice‐presidency of the board and the presence of family members occupying positions of president or vice president). Covariates were chosen as the size of the company (through Total Assets), age (time of foundation) and the sector of the company (from the rank of BM&FBovespa). For multiple regressions, the dependent variables were the Market Value and Enterprise Value. The results obtained show differences to financial results of each type of company. For costly liabilities, the presence of familiar attributes contributed to a lower recurrence of the use of third‐party capital. In net operating profit, the results of companies with familiar attributes were lower than non‐family firms. In the regressions, the results of family firms were worse than the non‐familiar.
本研究旨在了解具有家族特征的公司与非家族公司的财务绩效之间的差异。我们使用了Anderson and Reeb(2003)、Lee(2006)和Martinez et al.(2007)的参考文献。本研究通过使用协变量(ANCOVA)进行方差分析,以及两个多元回归的稳健性检验,具有定量性质。因变量是昂贵的负债和净营业利润。自变量是公司的特征(家族所有权控制、家族成员担任董事长或副董事长以及家族成员担任总裁或副总裁)。协变量选择为公司规模(通过总资产)、公司年龄(成立时间)和公司所属行业(来自BM&FBovespa的排名)。对于多元回归,因变量为市场价值和企业价值。所得结果表明,不同类型公司的财务结果存在差异。对于昂贵负债,熟悉属性的存在有助于降低使用第三方资本的复现率。在净营业利润方面,具有熟悉属性的企业的结果低于非家族企业。在回归中,家族企业的结果比非家族企业差。