Ozone stress and crop harvesting failure: Evidence from US food production

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Food Policy Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102540
Ziheng Liu , Qinan Lu
{"title":"Ozone stress and crop harvesting failure: Evidence from US food production","authors":"Ziheng Liu ,&nbsp;Qinan Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Farmers react to ozone injury by abandoning crops when the expected revenues cannot compensate for the harvesting costs. This study provides the first empirical evidence of ozone pollution’s impact on the decision to abandon crops. Using a causal inference framework, we find evidence that a one-standard-deviation rise in ozone concentration decreases the harvested ratios of corn and soybeans by 0.133 and 0.151 standard deviations, respectively. Our bootstrap simulation results show that the agricultural production benefits from ozone control would be considerably underestimated for both corn and soybeans without accounting for the saved acreage that should have been abandoned. The re-estimated benefits of agricultural production from ozone control inform policy design regarding air pollution management and highlight the importance of research and development in ozone-tolerance traits. We also discuss the effects of insurance and price regimes on agricultural production by providing evidence that insurance enrollment rates and crop prices are </span>imperative for adaptation to ozone stress, which facilitates insurance design to mitigate the adaptation </span>disincentive.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919223001380","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Farmers react to ozone injury by abandoning crops when the expected revenues cannot compensate for the harvesting costs. This study provides the first empirical evidence of ozone pollution’s impact on the decision to abandon crops. Using a causal inference framework, we find evidence that a one-standard-deviation rise in ozone concentration decreases the harvested ratios of corn and soybeans by 0.133 and 0.151 standard deviations, respectively. Our bootstrap simulation results show that the agricultural production benefits from ozone control would be considerably underestimated for both corn and soybeans without accounting for the saved acreage that should have been abandoned. The re-estimated benefits of agricultural production from ozone control inform policy design regarding air pollution management and highlight the importance of research and development in ozone-tolerance traits. We also discuss the effects of insurance and price regimes on agricultural production by providing evidence that insurance enrollment rates and crop prices are imperative for adaptation to ozone stress, which facilitates insurance design to mitigate the adaptation disincentive.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
臭氧胁迫和作物歉收:来自美国粮食生产的证据
农民对臭氧损害的反应是,当预期收入无法弥补收割成本时,放弃作物。该研究首次提供了臭氧污染对放弃作物决策影响的经验证据。使用因果推理框架,我们发现证据表明,臭氧浓度每增加一个标准差,玉米和大豆的收获比分别降低0.133和0.151个标准差。我们的bootstrap模拟结果表明,如果不考虑应该放弃的节省面积,玉米和大豆从臭氧控制中获得的农业生产效益将被大大低估。重新估计臭氧控制对农业生产的好处,为有关空气污染管理的政策设计提供了信息,并强调了研究和开发臭氧耐受性性状的重要性。我们还讨论了保险和价格制度对农业生产的影响,通过提供证据证明保险入学率和作物价格是适应臭氧胁迫的必要条件,这有助于保险设计以减轻适应抑制因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
期刊最新文献
Reflections on food policy in the context of healthy and sustainable diets The impact of pre-empting dual food quality regulation on product reformulation and packaging Autopsy of a futures market failure: Japan’s Dojima rice futures in the early 21st century Women improving nutrition through self-help groups in India: Does nutrition information help? Integrating system dynamics to value chain analysis to address price volatility in the Indonesian chilli value chain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1