Views of Speech-Language Pathologists on Telepractice for Children Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1352/1934-9556-61.1.31
Elizabeth E Biggs, Sarah N Douglas, Michelle C S Therrien, Melinda R Snodgrass
{"title":"Views of Speech-Language Pathologists on Telepractice for Children Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication.","authors":"Elizabeth E Biggs,&nbsp;Sarah N Douglas,&nbsp;Michelle C S Therrien,&nbsp;Melinda R Snodgrass","doi":"10.1352/1934-9556-61.1.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Telepractice has become increasingly utilized in disability services, particularly with recent and ongoing measures to slow the spread of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). In this study, 361 speech-language pathologists (SLPs) responded to a national, web-based survey about their views on utilizing telepractice with children aged 3 to 21 who used aided augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), such as picture symbols or speech-generating devices. The views of SLPs varied, and SLPs who received training on AAC telepractice within the last 12 months had more positive views about telepractice than those who did not. Several factors were associated with when and how SLPs thought telepractice was beneficial to serve children who use aided AAC, including SLPs' foundational perspectives about telepractice, service delivery options, considerations related to the child and family, and broader resources and constraints.</p>","PeriodicalId":47489,"journal":{"name":"Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-61.1.31","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Telepractice has become increasingly utilized in disability services, particularly with recent and ongoing measures to slow the spread of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). In this study, 361 speech-language pathologists (SLPs) responded to a national, web-based survey about their views on utilizing telepractice with children aged 3 to 21 who used aided augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), such as picture symbols or speech-generating devices. The views of SLPs varied, and SLPs who received training on AAC telepractice within the last 12 months had more positive views about telepractice than those who did not. Several factors were associated with when and how SLPs thought telepractice was beneficial to serve children who use aided AAC, including SLPs' foundational perspectives about telepractice, service delivery options, considerations related to the child and family, and broader resources and constraints.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语言病理学家对使用增强和替代交流的儿童远程练习的看法。
远程医疗越来越多地用于残疾人服务,特别是最近和正在采取措施减缓新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)的传播。在这项研究中,361名言语语言病理学家(slp)参与了一项全国性的基于网络的调查,调查内容是关于他们对使用辅助辅助和替代交流(AAC)(如图片符号或语音生成设备)的3至21岁儿童进行远程练习的看法。在过去12个月内接受过AAC远程实践培训的slp对远程实践的看法比没有接受过培训的slp对远程实践的看法更积极。有几个因素与slp何时以及如何认为远程实践有利于为使用辅助AAC的儿童提供服务有关,包括slp对远程实践的基本观点、服务提供选择、与儿童和家庭有关的考虑以及更广泛的资源和限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities is dedicated to meeting the information needs of those who seek effective ways to help people with mental retardation. The journal reports new teaching approaches, program developments, administrative tools, program evaluation, service utilization studies, community surveys, public policy issues, training and case studies, and current research in mental retardation. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities is a peer-reviewed journal whose consulting editors represent a broad spectrum of settings: universities, research centers, public and private residential care facilities, and specialized community service agencies.
期刊最新文献
"I Know How to Get Around Your 'No'": A Follow-Up of the FACES Psychoeducational Intervention. Capturing Staff Perspectives on Quality Interaction With Clients With Intellectual Disability: A Diary Study. Effect of a Nurses' Training Program on Early Detection of Egyptian Children With Developmental Disabilities in Assiut Governorate. Empowering Healthcare Professionals: Exploring Experiences Leading a Violence Prevention Course for Adults With Intellectual Disability. Preliminary Reliability and Validity of the Self-Determination Inventory: Student Report French Translation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1