A Review of the Published Literature in Global Population-Based Studies of Childhood Blindness and Vision Impairment.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmic epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-18 DOI:10.1080/09286586.2023.2204149
Ramona Bashshur, Caitlan DeVries, Joshua Bosman, Matthew Dunn
{"title":"A Review of the Published Literature in Global Population-Based Studies of Childhood Blindness and Vision Impairment.","authors":"Ramona Bashshur, Caitlan DeVries, Joshua Bosman, Matthew Dunn","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2023.2204149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Reducing childhood blindness and vision impairment (BVI) remains a global health priority. Our purpose was to summarize the peer-reviewed literature to date on measuring and reporting childhood BVI using population-based surveys and vision examinations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review of published studies that aimed to report BVI prevalence in children or studies that aimed to report BVI prevalence in the general population but which also included children. There were 201 articles identified for abstract review, and 86 studies were included in the final review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 52 studies (60%) that specifically aimed to investigate prevalence of blindness and/or vision impairment among child populations, while the remaining 34 studies aimed to study BVI in the general population but still reported data for age ranges that included children. The majority of researchers used the WHO criteria for blindness and vision impairment, sometimes with modifications. Age definitions for children varied considerably, with maximum cutoffs ranging from 3 to 20 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The available literature on childhood blindness indicates that while there has been substantial progress towards establishing an evidence base, more remains to be accomplished in terms of addressing gaps in understanding of the true prevalence and impacts of childhood blindness and vision loss. All studies in this review cited the need for improved vision care services, either for all ages or for the childhood years in particular.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"99-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2023.2204149","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Reducing childhood blindness and vision impairment (BVI) remains a global health priority. Our purpose was to summarize the peer-reviewed literature to date on measuring and reporting childhood BVI using population-based surveys and vision examinations.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review of published studies that aimed to report BVI prevalence in children or studies that aimed to report BVI prevalence in the general population but which also included children. There were 201 articles identified for abstract review, and 86 studies were included in the final review.

Results: There were 52 studies (60%) that specifically aimed to investigate prevalence of blindness and/or vision impairment among child populations, while the remaining 34 studies aimed to study BVI in the general population but still reported data for age ranges that included children. The majority of researchers used the WHO criteria for blindness and vision impairment, sometimes with modifications. Age definitions for children varied considerably, with maximum cutoffs ranging from 3 to 20 years.

Conclusion: The available literature on childhood blindness indicates that while there has been substantial progress towards establishing an evidence base, more remains to be accomplished in terms of addressing gaps in understanding of the true prevalence and impacts of childhood blindness and vision loss. All studies in this review cited the need for improved vision care services, either for all ages or for the childhood years in particular.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以全球人口为基础的儿童失明和视力障碍研究发表的文献综述。
目的减少儿童失明和视力损伤(BVI)仍然是全球健康的首要任务。我们的目的是总结迄今为止同行评议的文献,这些文献利用基于人口的调查和视力检查来测量和报告儿童BVI:我们对已发表的旨在报告儿童 BVI 患病率的研究或旨在报告普通人群 BVI 患病率但也包括儿童的研究进行了范围审查。共有 201 篇文章被确定为摘要综述,86 项研究被纳入最终综述:有 52 项研究(占 60%)专门调查了儿童群体中失明和/或视力障碍的患病率,其余 34 项研究旨在研究普通人群中的 BVI 患病率,但仍报告了包括儿童在内的年龄段的数据。大多数研究者都采用了世界卫生组织的失明和视力障碍标准,有时也会进行修改。儿童的年龄定义差异很大,最大界限从 3 岁到 20 岁不等:关于儿童失明的现有文献表明,虽然在建立证据基础方面取得了重大进展,但在了解儿童失明和视力丧失的真实发生率和影响方面仍有许多工作要做。本综述中的所有研究都提到了改善视力保健服务的必要性,无论是针对所有年龄段,还是针对儿童时期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmic epidemiology
Ophthalmic epidemiology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic Epidemiology is dedicated to the publication of original research into eye and vision health in the fields of epidemiology, public health and the prevention of blindness. Ophthalmic Epidemiology publishes editorials, original research reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles, brief communications and letters to the editor on all subjects related to ophthalmic epidemiology. A broad range of topics is suitable, such as: evaluating the risk of ocular diseases, general and specific study designs, screening program implementation and evaluation, eye health care access, delivery and outcomes, therapeutic efficacy or effectiveness, disease prognosis and quality of life, cost-benefit analysis, biostatistical theory and risk factor analysis. We are looking to expand our engagement with reports of international interest, including those regarding problems affecting developing countries, although reports from all over the world potentially are suitable. Clinical case reports, small case series (not enough for a cohort analysis) articles and animal research reports are not appropriate for this journal.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of a Risk Screening Tool for Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) in a German Cohort. Feasibility and Patient Experience of a Pilot Artificial Intelligence-Based Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Program in Northern Ontario. Binocular Visual Field Loss and Crash Risk: An eFOVID Population-Based Study. Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy and Dilated Fundus Examinations by Metropolitan Status from 2017-2021: An Assessment of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Weather Patterns, Patient, and Appointment Characteristics Associated with Cancellations and No-Shows in a Glaucoma Clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1