Predicting Total Back Squat Repetitions from Repetition Velocity and Velocity Loss.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Human Kinetics Pub Date : 2023-04-20 eCollection Date: 2023-04-01 DOI:10.5114/jhk/162021
Michael H Haischer, Joseph P Carzoli, Daniel M Cooke, Joshua C Pelland, Jacob F Remmert, Michael C Zourdos
{"title":"Predicting Total Back Squat Repetitions from Repetition Velocity and Velocity Loss.","authors":"Michael H Haischer, Joseph P Carzoli, Daniel M Cooke, Joshua C Pelland, Jacob F Remmert, Michael C Zourdos","doi":"10.5114/jhk/162021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this investigation was to determine if average concentric velocity (ACV) of a single repetition at 70% of one-repetition maximum (1RM), ACV of the first repetition of a set to failure at 70% of 1RM, or the velocity loss during the set could predict the number of repetitions performed in the back squat. Fifty-six resistance-trained individuals participated in the study (male = 41, age = 23 ± 3 yrs, 1RM = 162.0 ± 40.0 kg; female = 15, age = 21 ± 2 yrs, 1RM = 81.5 ± 12.5 kg). After 1RM testing, participants performed single repetition sets with 70% of 1RM and a set to failure with 70% of 1RM. ACV was recorded on all repetitions. Regression model comparisons were performed, and Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) and Standard Error of the Estimate (SEE) were calculated to determine the best model. Neither single repetition ACV at 70% of 1RM (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.004, p = 0.637) nor velocity loss (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.011, p = 0.445) were predictive of total repetitions performed in the set to failure. The simple quadratic model using the first repetition of the set to failure (<math><mrow><mi>Y</mi><mo>=</mo><msub><mi>β</mi><mn>0</mn></msub><mo>+</mo><msub><mi>β</mi><mn>1</mn></msub><msub><mi>X</mi><mrow><mi>A</mi><mi>C</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>F</mi><mi>i</mi><mi>r</mi><mi>s</mi><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub><mo>+</mo><msub><mi>β</mi><mn>2</mn></msub><mi>Z</mi><mo>+</mo><mi>ε</mi></mrow></math>) was identified as the best and most parsimonious model (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.259, F = 9.247, p < 0.001) due to the lowest AIC value (311.086). A SEE of 2.21 repetitions was identified with this model. This average error of ~2 repetitions warrants only cautious utilization of this method to predict total repetitions an individual can perform in a set, with additional autoregulatory or individualization strategies being necessary to finalize the training prescription.</p>","PeriodicalId":16055,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Kinetics","volume":"87 ","pages":"167-178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10203840/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Kinetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jhk/162021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to determine if average concentric velocity (ACV) of a single repetition at 70% of one-repetition maximum (1RM), ACV of the first repetition of a set to failure at 70% of 1RM, or the velocity loss during the set could predict the number of repetitions performed in the back squat. Fifty-six resistance-trained individuals participated in the study (male = 41, age = 23 ± 3 yrs, 1RM = 162.0 ± 40.0 kg; female = 15, age = 21 ± 2 yrs, 1RM = 81.5 ± 12.5 kg). After 1RM testing, participants performed single repetition sets with 70% of 1RM and a set to failure with 70% of 1RM. ACV was recorded on all repetitions. Regression model comparisons were performed, and Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) and Standard Error of the Estimate (SEE) were calculated to determine the best model. Neither single repetition ACV at 70% of 1RM (R2 = 0.004, p = 0.637) nor velocity loss (R2 = 0.011, p = 0.445) were predictive of total repetitions performed in the set to failure. The simple quadratic model using the first repetition of the set to failure (Y=β0+β1XACVFirst+β2Z+ε) was identified as the best and most parsimonious model (R2 = 0.259, F = 9.247, p < 0.001) due to the lowest AIC value (311.086). A SEE of 2.21 repetitions was identified with this model. This average error of ~2 repetitions warrants only cautious utilization of this method to predict total repetitions an individual can perform in a set, with additional autoregulatory or individualization strategies being necessary to finalize the training prescription.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从重复速度和速度损失预测后蹲的总重复次数。
这项研究的目的是确定以单次最大重量(1RM)的 70% 进行的单次重复的平均同心速度(ACV)、以 1RM 的 70% 进行的一组动作中第一次重复至失败的 ACV 或一组动作中的速度损失是否能预测后蹲的重复次数。56 名接受过阻力训练的人员参与了研究(男性 = 41 人,年龄 = 23 ± 3 岁,1RM = 162.0 ± 40.0 千克;女性 = 15 人,年龄 = 21 ± 2 岁,1RM = 81.5 ± 12.5 千克)。在 1RM 测试后,参与者以 1RM 的 70% 进行单组重复,并以 1RM 的 70% 进行一组失败重复。所有重复动作都记录了 ACV。对回归模型进行比较,并计算阿凯克信息标准(AIC)和估计标准误差(SEE),以确定最佳模型。1RM 70% 时的单次重复 ACV(R2 = 0.004,p = 0.637)和速度损失(R2 = 0.011,p = 0.445)都不能预测成套动作至失败时的总重复次数。由于 AIC 值最低 (311.086),使用成套动作第一次重复至失败的简单二次模型 (Y=β0+β1XACVFirst+β2Z+ε) 被认为是最佳和最合理的模型 (R2 = 0.259, F = 9.247, p < 0.001)。该模型确定了 2.21 次重复的 SEE。由于平均误差约为 2 次,因此只能谨慎使用这种方法来预测一个人在一组动作中的总重复次数,还需要额外的自动调节或个性化策略来最终确定训练处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Kinetics
Journal of Human Kinetics 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Human Kinetics is an open access interdisciplinary periodical offering the latest research in the science of human movement studies. This comprehensive professional journal features articles and research notes encompassing such topic areas as: Kinesiology, Exercise Physiology and Nutrition, Sports Training and Behavioural Sciences in Sport, but especially considering elite and competitive aspects of sport. The journal publishes original papers, invited reviews, short communications and letters to the Editors. Manuscripts submitted to the journal must contain novel data on theoretical or experimental research or on practical applications in the field of sport sciences. The Journal of Human Kinetics is published in March, June, September and December. We encourage scientists from around the world to submit their papers to our periodical.
期刊最新文献
Habitual Running Style Matters: Duty Factor, and Not Stride Frequency, Relates to Loading Magnitude. Impact of the TTN C > T Polymorphism on Selected Variables of Aerobic and Anaerobic Capacity after a 12-Week Training Program. Increasing Braking and Amortization Forces during the Countermovement Jump Does Not Necessarily Improve Jump Height. Poor Joint Work in the Lower Limbs during a Tennis Forehand Groundstroke after a Cross-Over Step Inhibits an Increase in the Racket Speed. The Effect of Protective Mat Thickness on the Upper Limb Strike Force Simulation in Combat Sports and Self Defense.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1