Elevated fibrinogen to pre-albumin ratio predicts mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Seminars in Dialysis Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-29 DOI:10.1111/sdi.13159
Wenkai Xia, Xi Hua, Dong Sun, Xiangcheng Xie, Meisi Kuang, Hong Hu
{"title":"Elevated fibrinogen to pre-albumin ratio predicts mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients.","authors":"Wenkai Xia, Xi Hua, Dong Sun, Xiangcheng Xie, Meisi Kuang, Hong Hu","doi":"10.1111/sdi.13159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fibrinogen to pre-albumin ratio (FPR) is a promising predictor of mortality in various cancers. The aim of this study was to explore the prognostic value of FPR to predict mortality in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 324 incident PD patients form January 2011 to December 2020. Patients were stratified based on the optimal thresholds for FPR at baseline to predict overall and cardiovascular mortality during follow-up. The association of FPR and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients were divided into three groups based on the optimal cutoff value of FPR. Higher FPR levels were strongly correlated with worse overall and cardiovascular mortality in PD patients. Compared with patients in the lowest FPR tertile (<14.3), those in the highest terile (≥18.8) had multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (95% CI confidence interval) of 3.37 (1.76-6.49) and 2.86 (1.31-6.23) for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, respectively. Significant differences in overall survival were observed across nearly all subgroups after stratification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with a high FPR had increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. FPR is a potential prognostic indicator in PD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":21675,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Dialysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.13159","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fibrinogen to pre-albumin ratio (FPR) is a promising predictor of mortality in various cancers. The aim of this study was to explore the prognostic value of FPR to predict mortality in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 324 incident PD patients form January 2011 to December 2020. Patients were stratified based on the optimal thresholds for FPR at baseline to predict overall and cardiovascular mortality during follow-up. The association of FPR and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox regression analysis.

Results: All patients were divided into three groups based on the optimal cutoff value of FPR. Higher FPR levels were strongly correlated with worse overall and cardiovascular mortality in PD patients. Compared with patients in the lowest FPR tertile (<14.3), those in the highest terile (≥18.8) had multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (95% CI confidence interval) of 3.37 (1.76-6.49) and 2.86 (1.31-6.23) for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, respectively. Significant differences in overall survival were observed across nearly all subgroups after stratification.

Conclusions: Patients with a high FPR had increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. FPR is a potential prognostic indicator in PD patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纤维蛋白原与前白蛋白比率升高可预测腹膜透析患者的死亡率。
背景:纤维蛋白原与前白蛋白比值(FPR)是预测各种癌症死亡率的有效指标。本研究旨在探讨 FPR 在预测腹膜透析(PD)患者死亡率方面的预后价值:我们对 2011 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间的 324 例腹膜透析患者进行了回顾性分析。根据基线 FPR 的最佳阈值对患者进行分层,以预测随访期间的总死亡率和心血管死亡率。通过卡普兰-梅耶曲线和考克斯回归分析评估了FPR与全因死亡率和心血管死亡率的关系:结果:根据 FPR 的最佳临界值,所有患者被分为三组。FPR水平越高,PD患者的总死亡率和心血管死亡率越低。与 FPR 最低三等分组的患者相比(结论:FPR 较高的患者总体死亡率和心血管死亡率更高:FPR较高的患者全因死亡率和心血管死亡率均有所上升。FPR是一种潜在的帕金森病预后指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Dialysis
Seminars in Dialysis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
91
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Dialysis is a bimonthly publication focusing exclusively on cutting-edge clinical aspects of dialysis therapy. Besides publishing papers by the most respected names in the field of dialysis, the Journal has unique useful features, all designed to keep you current: -Fellows Forum -Dialysis rounds -Editorials -Opinions -Briefly noted -Summary and Comment -Guest Edited Issues -Special Articles Virtually everything you read in Seminars in Dialysis is written or solicited by the editors after choosing the most effective of nine different editorial styles and formats. They know that facts, speculations, ''how-to-do-it'' information, opinions, and news reports all play important roles in your education and the patient care you provide. Alternate issues of the journal are guest edited and focus on a single clinical topic in dialysis.
期刊最新文献
Thyroid Function Trends in Dialysis: Unveiling Peritoneal and Hemodialysis Disparities. Tidal Versus Intermittent Peritoneal Dialysis in Chronic Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: Randomized, Open-Label, Prospective Control Study. Does the Use of Gastric-Acid Suppressants Increase the Risk of Peritonitis in Patients Undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis? A Meta-Analysis. A Rare Cause of Hypotension in Routine Hemodialysis: Secondary Adrenal Insufficiency. Vancomycin Dosing Strategy for the Treatment of Peritonitis in a Child on Automated Peritoneal Dialysis: A First Pediatric Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1