Effect of storage media on chondrocyte viability during cold storage of osteochondral dowels.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY Cell and Tissue Banking Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-08 DOI:10.1007/s10561-023-10104-1
Noor Abdelwahab, Mohammadhamed Shahsavari, Kezhou Wu, Leila Laouar, Tamara D Skene-Arnold, Janet A W Elliott, Nadr M Jomha
{"title":"Effect of storage media on chondrocyte viability during cold storage of osteochondral dowels.","authors":"Noor Abdelwahab, Mohammadhamed Shahsavari, Kezhou Wu, Leila Laouar, Tamara D Skene-Arnold, Janet A W Elliott, Nadr M Jomha","doi":"10.1007/s10561-023-10104-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Osteochondral allograft transplantation is a successfully proven method to repair articular cartilage defects and prevent the degenerative effects of osteoarthritis. The number of osteochondral transplantations that can be performed each year is limited by availability of donor cartilage tissue and storage time constraints. Osteochondral transplantation success has been linked to high chondrocyte viability of the donor cartilage tissue at the time of implantation. Determining optimal storage conditions for donor cartilage is essential for tissue banks to safely provide quality cartilage tissue. In this study, we compared three tissue/cell media (DMEM/F12, RPMI-1640 and X-VIVO 10) for their ability to maintain chondrocyte viability during hypothermic storage for 28 days. Porcine osteochondral dowels were stored in each media for 28 days and cell viability was assessed every 7 days. Over the 28 day storage period, the chondrocyte viability of dowels stored in DMEM/F12, RPMI-1640, and X-VIVO 10 media all declined in a similar fashion. Our results show that all three media were equivalent in their ability to maintain cell viability of the cartilage tissue and provides rationale for the use of lower cost cell media (DMEM/F12 and RPMI-1640) for hypothermic storage of articular cartilage tissue.</p>","PeriodicalId":9723,"journal":{"name":"Cell and Tissue Banking","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell and Tissue Banking","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-023-10104-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Osteochondral allograft transplantation is a successfully proven method to repair articular cartilage defects and prevent the degenerative effects of osteoarthritis. The number of osteochondral transplantations that can be performed each year is limited by availability of donor cartilage tissue and storage time constraints. Osteochondral transplantation success has been linked to high chondrocyte viability of the donor cartilage tissue at the time of implantation. Determining optimal storage conditions for donor cartilage is essential for tissue banks to safely provide quality cartilage tissue. In this study, we compared three tissue/cell media (DMEM/F12, RPMI-1640 and X-VIVO 10) for their ability to maintain chondrocyte viability during hypothermic storage for 28 days. Porcine osteochondral dowels were stored in each media for 28 days and cell viability was assessed every 7 days. Over the 28 day storage period, the chondrocyte viability of dowels stored in DMEM/F12, RPMI-1640, and X-VIVO 10 media all declined in a similar fashion. Our results show that all three media were equivalent in their ability to maintain cell viability of the cartilage tissue and provides rationale for the use of lower cost cell media (DMEM/F12 and RPMI-1640) for hypothermic storage of articular cartilage tissue.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨软骨榫冷藏过程中储存介质对软骨细胞活力的影响
骨软骨异体移植是修复关节软骨缺损和预防骨关节炎退行性影响的一种行之有效的方法。由于供体软骨组织的可用性和储存时间的限制,每年可进行的骨软骨移植数量有限。骨软骨移植的成功与植入时供体软骨组织中软骨细胞的高存活率有关。确定供体软骨的最佳储存条件对组织库安全提供优质软骨组织至关重要。在这项研究中,我们比较了三种组织/细胞培养基(DMEM/F12、RPMI-1640 和 X-VIVO 10)在低温保存 28 天期间维持软骨细胞活力的能力。猪骨软骨楔在每种培养基中储存 28 天,每隔 7 天评估一次细胞存活率。在 28 天的储存期间,储存在 DMEM/F12、RPMI-1640 和 X-VIVO 10 培养基中的镙丝钉的软骨细胞活力都以类似的方式下降。我们的研究结果表明,这三种培养基维持软骨组织细胞活力的能力相当,这也为使用成本较低的细胞培养基(DMEM/F12 和 RPMI-1640)进行关节软骨组织低温储存提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cell and Tissue Banking
Cell and Tissue Banking CELL BIOLOGY-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cell and Tissue Banking provides a forum for disseminating information to scientists and clinicians involved in the banking and transplantation of cells and tissues. Cell and Tissue Banking is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original papers in the following areas: basic research concerning general aspects of tissue banking such as quality assurance and control of banked cells/tissues, effects of preservation and sterilisation methods on cells/tissues, biotechnology, etc.; clinical applications of banked cells/tissues; standards of practice in procurement, processing, storage and distribution of cells/tissues; ethical issues; medico-legal issues.
期刊最新文献
Dose-dependent effects of gamma radiation sterilization on the collagen matrix of human cortical bone allograft and its influence on fatigue crack propagation resistance. Biomechanical evaluation of a sheep tracheal scaffold. Histological evaluation of decellularization of freeze dried and chemically treated indigenously prepared bovine pericardium membrane. Comparison of the structural integrity and quality of corneal endothelium stored in organ culture storage medium versus Eusol-C. Effects of nanographene oxide on adipose-derived stem cell cryopreservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1