孕期促进口腔健康行为:一项随机对照试验。

IF 1.4 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of research in health sciences Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.34172/jrhs.2023.119
Saeid Bashirian, Maryam Barati, Majid Barati, Samane Shirahmadi, Salman Khazaei, Ensiyeh Jenabi, Leila Gholami
{"title":"孕期促进口腔健康行为:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Saeid Bashirian,&nbsp;Maryam Barati,&nbsp;Majid Barati,&nbsp;Samane Shirahmadi,&nbsp;Salman Khazaei,&nbsp;Ensiyeh Jenabi,&nbsp;Leila Gholami","doi":"10.34172/jrhs.2023.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pregnant women are vulnerable to oral disease due to physiological, hormonal, and dietary alterations. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of the educational program according to the Health Promotion Model (HPM) on the oral health prevention behavior of pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was performed on 105 pregnant women visiting health centers located in Arak from February to November 2022. The subjects were randomly assigned to intervention (n=54) and control (n=51) groups. A reliable and valid questionnaire according to HPM constructs was used to collect the data. The pre-test was conducted in the groups. The intervention group received the educational program in 9 educational sessions (from 12 to 24 weeks of pregnancy). Then, the post-test was conducted in the 36th week of pregnancy in the groups. Finally, the data were analyzed by SPSS software (version 18) and using independent t-test, paired t-test, and Chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups regarding perceived benefits (24.68±3.63 vs. 26.57±3.67, <i>P</i>=0.009), perceived barriers (7.31±3.14 vs. 5.81±3.59, <i>P</i>=0.025), positive affect (10.50±1.66 vs. 11.29±1.34, <i>P</i>=0.009), negative affect (1.59±0.223 vs. 1.40±1.51, <i>P</i>=0.006), commitment to the action plan (4.05±1.92 vs. 4.77±1.50, <i>P</i>=0.034), and tooth brushing time (2.29±0.72 vs. 2.74±0.48, <i>P</i><0.001). However, no significant difference was observed regarding the tooth brushing frequency (2.05±0.58 vs. 2.07±0.66, <i>P</i>=0.901) after the intervention. The brushing time for 2-3 minutes in the intervention group increased from 51.85% to 75.92% after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HPM-based education was effective in promoting the duration of tooth brushing in pregnant women. However, it had no effect on the tooth brushing frequency.</p>","PeriodicalId":17164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of research in health sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10422136/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promoting Oral Health Behavior During Pregnancy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Saeid Bashirian,&nbsp;Maryam Barati,&nbsp;Majid Barati,&nbsp;Samane Shirahmadi,&nbsp;Salman Khazaei,&nbsp;Ensiyeh Jenabi,&nbsp;Leila Gholami\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/jrhs.2023.119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pregnant women are vulnerable to oral disease due to physiological, hormonal, and dietary alterations. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of the educational program according to the Health Promotion Model (HPM) on the oral health prevention behavior of pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was performed on 105 pregnant women visiting health centers located in Arak from February to November 2022. The subjects were randomly assigned to intervention (n=54) and control (n=51) groups. A reliable and valid questionnaire according to HPM constructs was used to collect the data. The pre-test was conducted in the groups. The intervention group received the educational program in 9 educational sessions (from 12 to 24 weeks of pregnancy). Then, the post-test was conducted in the 36th week of pregnancy in the groups. Finally, the data were analyzed by SPSS software (version 18) and using independent t-test, paired t-test, and Chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups regarding perceived benefits (24.68±3.63 vs. 26.57±3.67, <i>P</i>=0.009), perceived barriers (7.31±3.14 vs. 5.81±3.59, <i>P</i>=0.025), positive affect (10.50±1.66 vs. 11.29±1.34, <i>P</i>=0.009), negative affect (1.59±0.223 vs. 1.40±1.51, <i>P</i>=0.006), commitment to the action plan (4.05±1.92 vs. 4.77±1.50, <i>P</i>=0.034), and tooth brushing time (2.29±0.72 vs. 2.74±0.48, <i>P</i><0.001). However, no significant difference was observed regarding the tooth brushing frequency (2.05±0.58 vs. 2.07±0.66, <i>P</i>=0.901) after the intervention. The brushing time for 2-3 minutes in the intervention group increased from 51.85% to 75.92% after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HPM-based education was effective in promoting the duration of tooth brushing in pregnant women. However, it had no effect on the tooth brushing frequency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of research in health sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10422136/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of research in health sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/jrhs.2023.119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of research in health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jrhs.2023.119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于生理、激素和饮食的改变,孕妇易患口腔疾病。摘要本研究旨在评估健康促进模式(HPM)教育计划对孕妇口腔健康预防行为的影响。研究设计:随机对照试验。方法:对2022年2月至11月在阿拉克省卫生院就诊的105名孕妇进行研究。受试者被随机分为干预组(n=54)和对照组(n=51)。采用可靠有效的HPM结构问卷进行数据收集。预试在各组中进行。干预组接受9次教育课程(妊娠12 ~ 24周)。然后在妊娠第36周进行后测。最后,采用SPSS软件(version 18)对数据进行分析,采用独立t检验、配对t检验和卡方检验。结果:干预组与对照组在干预后感知到的获益(24.68±3.63比26.57±3.67,P=0.009)、感知到的障碍(7.31±3.14比5.81±3.59,P=0.025)、积极情绪(10.50±1.66比11.29±1.34,P=0.009)、消极情绪(1.59±0.223比1.40±1.51,P=0.006)、对行动计划的投入(4.05±1.92比4.77±1.50,P=0.034)、刷牙时间(2.29±0.72比2.74±0.48,P=0.901)方面差异均有统计学意义。干预组2 ~ 3分钟刷牙时间由干预后的51.85%提高到75.92%。结论:以健康护理为基础的教育对提高孕妇的刷牙时间是有效的。然而,它对刷牙频率没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Promoting Oral Health Behavior During Pregnancy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Pregnant women are vulnerable to oral disease due to physiological, hormonal, and dietary alterations. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of the educational program according to the Health Promotion Model (HPM) on the oral health prevention behavior of pregnant women.

Study design: A randomized controlled trial.

Methods: This study was performed on 105 pregnant women visiting health centers located in Arak from February to November 2022. The subjects were randomly assigned to intervention (n=54) and control (n=51) groups. A reliable and valid questionnaire according to HPM constructs was used to collect the data. The pre-test was conducted in the groups. The intervention group received the educational program in 9 educational sessions (from 12 to 24 weeks of pregnancy). Then, the post-test was conducted in the 36th week of pregnancy in the groups. Finally, the data were analyzed by SPSS software (version 18) and using independent t-test, paired t-test, and Chi-square test.

Results: There were statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups regarding perceived benefits (24.68±3.63 vs. 26.57±3.67, P=0.009), perceived barriers (7.31±3.14 vs. 5.81±3.59, P=0.025), positive affect (10.50±1.66 vs. 11.29±1.34, P=0.009), negative affect (1.59±0.223 vs. 1.40±1.51, P=0.006), commitment to the action plan (4.05±1.92 vs. 4.77±1.50, P=0.034), and tooth brushing time (2.29±0.72 vs. 2.74±0.48, P<0.001). However, no significant difference was observed regarding the tooth brushing frequency (2.05±0.58 vs. 2.07±0.66, P=0.901) after the intervention. The brushing time for 2-3 minutes in the intervention group increased from 51.85% to 75.92% after the intervention.

Conclusion: HPM-based education was effective in promoting the duration of tooth brushing in pregnant women. However, it had no effect on the tooth brushing frequency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of research in health sciences
Journal of research in health sciences PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research in Health Sciences (JRHS) is the official journal of the School of Public Health; Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, which is published quarterly. Since 2017, JRHS is published electronically. JRHS is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication which is produced quarterly and is a multidisciplinary journal in the field of public health, publishing contributions from Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Public Health, Occupational Health, Environmental Health, Health Education, and Preventive and Social Medicine. We do not publish clinical trials, nursing studies, animal studies, qualitative studies, nutritional studies, health insurance, and hospital management. In addition, we do not publish the results of laboratory and chemical studies in the field of ergonomics, occupational health, and environmental health
期刊最新文献
Asymptomatic Children as a Missing Link in Preventing COVID-19 Transmission The Role of Social Support in Preventing Suicidal Ideations and Behaviors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Diagnostic Accuracy of Mid-Upper Arm Circumference for the Detection of Acute Malnutrition Among Children Aged 6–60 Months: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study Effectiveness of Social Media-Based Intervention in Intention Change of Adolescents for Promoting Sexual Health Behavior in Western Terai of Nepal Identification of Risk Factors for Relapse in Childhood Leukemia Using Penalized Semi-parametric Mixture Cure Competing Risks Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1