与标准深度全身麻醉相比,深度全身麻醉对急性术后疼痛的有效性和患者安全性:一项系统评价方案。

Haile FitzGerald, Emily Anderson, Lori Rae Anderson, Andy J Tracy, J Scott Thomson
{"title":"与标准深度全身麻醉相比,深度全身麻醉对急性术后疼痛的有效性和患者安全性:一项系统评价方案。","authors":"Haile FitzGerald, Emily Anderson, Lori Rae Anderson, Andy J Tracy, J Scott Thomson","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-2018-004040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this systematic review is to synthesize the best available evidence related to the effectiveness of deep general anesthesia on acute postoperative pain and patient safety in adult patients.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acute postoperative pain is a common physiological side effect of surgery that should be alleviated as soon as possible to reduce suffering and other detrimental effects. Given the adverse effects related to the use of opioids for pain management, and in the current opioid epidemic, evidence-based clinical practice recommendations are needed to reduce the use of opioids in the treatment of acute postoperative pain.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will include studies of adult patients that incorporate the intervention of deep general anesthesia (bispectral index values of 45 or less), compared to the provision of a standard depth of general anesthesia (bispectral index values 45-60). Included studies will report acute postoperative pain (within the first 48 hours after surgery) as a primary outcome variable. Secondary outcomes of interest include opioid consumption and any reported adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-step search strategy will be used to locate studies published in English from 1992 (advent of electroencephalography index monitoring technology) in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases. Two independent reviewers will assess retrieved studies against inclusion criteria, complete critical appraisal for methodological quality and extract data using a standardized tool. Data will be synthesized using statistical meta-analysis, where possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":73539,"journal":{"name":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of deep general anesthesia compared to the standard depth of general anesthesia for acute postoperative pain and patient safety: a systematic review protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Haile FitzGerald, Emily Anderson, Lori Rae Anderson, Andy J Tracy, J Scott Thomson\",\"doi\":\"10.11124/JBISRIR-2018-004040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this systematic review is to synthesize the best available evidence related to the effectiveness of deep general anesthesia on acute postoperative pain and patient safety in adult patients.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acute postoperative pain is a common physiological side effect of surgery that should be alleviated as soon as possible to reduce suffering and other detrimental effects. Given the adverse effects related to the use of opioids for pain management, and in the current opioid epidemic, evidence-based clinical practice recommendations are needed to reduce the use of opioids in the treatment of acute postoperative pain.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will include studies of adult patients that incorporate the intervention of deep general anesthesia (bispectral index values of 45 or less), compared to the provision of a standard depth of general anesthesia (bispectral index values 45-60). Included studies will report acute postoperative pain (within the first 48 hours after surgery) as a primary outcome variable. Secondary outcomes of interest include opioid consumption and any reported adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-step search strategy will be used to locate studies published in English from 1992 (advent of electroencephalography index monitoring technology) in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases. Two independent reviewers will assess retrieved studies against inclusion criteria, complete critical appraisal for methodological quality and extract data using a standardized tool. Data will be synthesized using statistical meta-analysis, where possible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2018-004040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2018-004040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本系统综述的目的是综合与深度全麻对成年患者术后急性疼痛的有效性和患者安全相关的最佳可用证据。引言:术后急性疼痛是手术中常见的生理副作用,应尽快缓解,以减少痛苦和其他有害影响。鉴于阿片类药物用于疼痛管理的不良反应,以及在当前阿片类疾病流行的情况下,需要循证临床实践建议来减少阿片类物质在治疗急性术后疼痛中的使用。纳入标准:本综述将包括对成年患者的研究,与提供标准深度全身麻醉(双频谱指数值45-60)相比,采用深度全身麻醉干预(双频谱指数数值为45或更低)。纳入的研究将报告术后急性疼痛(在前48 手术后数小时)作为主要结果变量。感兴趣的次要结果包括阿片类药物消费和任何报告的不良结果。方法:采用三步搜索策略在Ovid-MEDLINE、Embase和CINAHL数据库中查找1992年(脑电图指标监测技术的出现)以来以英语发表的研究。两名独立评审员将根据纳入标准评估检索到的研究,完成方法学质量的关键评估,并使用标准化工具提取数据。数据将尽可能使用统计荟萃分析进行综合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of deep general anesthesia compared to the standard depth of general anesthesia for acute postoperative pain and patient safety: a systematic review protocol.

Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to synthesize the best available evidence related to the effectiveness of deep general anesthesia on acute postoperative pain and patient safety in adult patients.

Introduction: Acute postoperative pain is a common physiological side effect of surgery that should be alleviated as soon as possible to reduce suffering and other detrimental effects. Given the adverse effects related to the use of opioids for pain management, and in the current opioid epidemic, evidence-based clinical practice recommendations are needed to reduce the use of opioids in the treatment of acute postoperative pain.

Inclusion criteria: This review will include studies of adult patients that incorporate the intervention of deep general anesthesia (bispectral index values of 45 or less), compared to the provision of a standard depth of general anesthesia (bispectral index values 45-60). Included studies will report acute postoperative pain (within the first 48 hours after surgery) as a primary outcome variable. Secondary outcomes of interest include opioid consumption and any reported adverse outcomes.

Methods: A three-step search strategy will be used to locate studies published in English from 1992 (advent of electroencephalography index monitoring technology) in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases. Two independent reviewers will assess retrieved studies against inclusion criteria, complete critical appraisal for methodological quality and extract data using a standardized tool. Data will be synthesized using statistical meta-analysis, where possible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Approaches to implementing individual placement and support in the health and welfare sectors: a scoping review protocol. Obesity and dental caries in early childhood: a systematic review protocol. Experiences of family caregivers caring for critically ill children hospitalized in a pediatric intensive care unit: a qualitative systematic review protocol. Hernioplasty using low-cost mesh compared to surgical mesh in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol. Impact of clinical supervision of health professionals on organizational outcomes: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1